Adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Criteria for Inguinal and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer Patients-A Survey Assessment in German-speaking Countries on Behalf of the European Prospective Penile Cancer Study Group.

Guideline adherence Inguinal lymphadenectomy Pelvic lymphadenectomy Penile cancer Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis

Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 12 12 2019
revised: 27 01 2020
accepted: 05 02 2020
pubmed: 25 2 2020
medline: 14 4 2022
entrez: 25 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Urologists' adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations to perform inguinal (ILND) and pelvic (PLND) lymph node dissection in penile cancer (PC) patients is not known. To assess a German-speaking European cohort of urologists based on their criteria to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients. A 14-item survey addressing general issues of PC treatment was developed and sent to 45 clinical centers in Germany (n = 34), Austria (n = 8), Switzerland (n = 2), and Italy (n = 1). Two of the 14 questions assessed the criteria to perform ILND and ipsilateral PLND. Correct responses for ILND and PLND criteria were assessed. Based on a multivariate logistic-regression-model, criteria independently predicting guideline adherence were identified. In total, 557 urologists participated in the survey, of whom 43.5%, 19.3%, and 37.2% were residents in training, certified, and in leading positions, respectively. ILND and PLND criteria were correctly identified by 35.2% and 23.9%, respectively. Of the participants, 23.3% used external sources for survey completion. The use of auxiliary tools (odds ratio [OR] 1.57; p[ Our results demonstrate overall suboptimal knowledge of the correct indications to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients among the surveyed urologists. We propose that governments and healthcare providers should be encouraged to centralize PC management. The management of inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes is crucial for the survival of penile cancer patients. Disease rarity mandates referral to clinical practice guidelines for appropriate treatment selection.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Urologists' adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations to perform inguinal (ILND) and pelvic (PLND) lymph node dissection in penile cancer (PC) patients is not known.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To assess a German-speaking European cohort of urologists based on their criteria to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
A 14-item survey addressing general issues of PC treatment was developed and sent to 45 clinical centers in Germany (n = 34), Austria (n = 8), Switzerland (n = 2), and Italy (n = 1).
INTERVENTION METHODS
Two of the 14 questions assessed the criteria to perform ILND and ipsilateral PLND.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
Correct responses for ILND and PLND criteria were assessed. Based on a multivariate logistic-regression-model, criteria independently predicting guideline adherence were identified.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
In total, 557 urologists participated in the survey, of whom 43.5%, 19.3%, and 37.2% were residents in training, certified, and in leading positions, respectively. ILND and PLND criteria were correctly identified by 35.2% and 23.9%, respectively. Of the participants, 23.3% used external sources for survey completion. The use of auxiliary tools (odds ratio [OR] 1.57; p[
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate overall suboptimal knowledge of the correct indications to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients among the surveyed urologists. We propose that governments and healthcare providers should be encouraged to centralize PC management.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
The management of inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes is crucial for the survival of penile cancer patients. Disease rarity mandates referral to clinical practice guidelines for appropriate treatment selection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32089496
pii: S2405-4569(20)30061-4
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.02.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

843-849

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola (R)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: rodrigo.suarez@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Friedemann Zengerling (F)

Department of Urology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Marlene Haccius (M)

Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany.

Steffen Lebentrau (S)

Department of Urology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Ruppiner Kliniken, Neuruppin, Germany.

Hans-Peter Schmid (HP)

Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Maximilian Bier (M)

Department of Urology, Bethel Evangelical Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany.

Sebastian Lenart (S)

Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Department of Urology, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Florian A Distler (FA)

Department of Urology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.

Irene Resch (I)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Markus Oelschlager (M)

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.

Matthias May (M)

Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany.

Christian Bolenz (C)

Department of Urology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Christian Gratzke (C)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.

Arkadiusz Miernik (A)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.

Gamal Anton Wakileh (GA)

Department of Urology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH