Evaluation of the quality of the information received during head and neck cancer announcement: Prospective two-center study.
Journal
Head & neck
ISSN: 1097-0347
Titre abrégé: Head Neck
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8902541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
01
07
2019
revised:
14
11
2019
accepted:
28
01
2020
pubmed:
25
2
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
25
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Providing patient with cancer with appropriate information following the disclosure of a cancer diagnosis has multiple benefits. The objective was to evaluate the quality of the information received during an announcement for head and neck cancer and to determine predictive factors. We conducted a prospective two-center study using self-questionnaires to assess the patient's perception of the quality of the announcement. Satisfaction scores on the information provided about the overall disease were 7.7/10. The main positive predictors of quality were a satisfactory consultation setting (P = .004), assessment of pain by a physician (P = .04), physician availability (P = .003), accurate information about tumor stage, quality of information regarding the type (P < .0001) and purpose (P = .001) of treatment and its side effects (P = .006), and the interview with the oncology nurse coordinator (P < .05). Patients who received the announcement of head and neck cancer perceived the information received during the pretherapeutic period as satisfactory.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Providing patient with cancer with appropriate information following the disclosure of a cancer diagnosis has multiple benefits. The objective was to evaluate the quality of the information received during an announcement for head and neck cancer and to determine predictive factors.
METHODS
We conducted a prospective two-center study using self-questionnaires to assess the patient's perception of the quality of the announcement.
RESULTS
Satisfaction scores on the information provided about the overall disease were 7.7/10. The main positive predictors of quality were a satisfactory consultation setting (P = .004), assessment of pain by a physician (P = .04), physician availability (P = .003), accurate information about tumor stage, quality of information regarding the type (P < .0001) and purpose (P = .001) of treatment and its side effects (P = .006), and the interview with the oncology nurse coordinator (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients who received the announcement of head and neck cancer perceived the information received during the pretherapeutic period as satisfactory.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1800-1810Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Guizard A-V, Uhry Z, de Raucourt D, Mazzoleni G, Sánchez M-J, Ligier K. Trends in net survival from head and neck cancer in six European Latin countries: results from the SUDCAN population-based study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017;26:S16-S23.
Rettig EM, D'Souza G. Epidemiology of head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24(3):379-396.
Ringash J. Survivorship and quality of life in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3322-3327.
Buiret G, Chidiac F, Pujo K, Combe C. How to reconcile therapeutic patient education and care pathology in oncology: application in head and neck neoplams. Bull Cancer (Paris). 2019;106(5):468-78
INCa. Plan Cancer 2014-2019. 2015 p. 210. Report No.: Paris: PLANKPNRT14.
Bozec A, Schultz P, Gal J, et al. Evaluation of the information given to patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery using the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: a prospective multicentric study. Eur J Cancer. 2016;67:73-82.
Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O, et al. An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(15):2726-2738.
Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors' satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):342-349.
Cox A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Langridge C, Fallowfield L. Information needs and experiences: an audit of UKcancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006;10(4):263-272.
Best J, Muzaffar J, Mitchell-Innes A. Quality of information available via the internet for patients with head and neck cancer: are we improving? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(11):3499-3505.
Konstantis A, Exiara T. Breaking bad news in cancer patients. Indian J Palliat Care. 2015;21(1):35-38.
Pagedar NA, Davis AB, Sperry SM, Charlton ME, Lynch CF. Population analysis of socioeconomic status and otolaryngologist distribution on head and neck cancer outcomes. Head Neck. 2019;41(4):1046-1052.
Osazuwa-Peters N, Christopher KM, Cass LM, et al. What's Love Got to do with it? Marital status and survival of head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2019;28:e13022.
Bozec A, Poissonnet G, Chamorey E, et al. Free-flap head and neck reconstruction and quality of life: a 2-year prospective study. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(5):874-880.
Pierre CS, Dassonville O, Chamorey E, et al. Long-term quality of life and its predictive factors after oncologic surgery and microvascular reconstruction in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(4):801-807.
Epstein JB, Kish RV, Hallajian L, Sciubba J. Head and neck, oral, and oropharyngeal cancer: a review of medicolegal cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119(2):177-186.
Adamson M, Choi K, Notaro S, Cotoc C. The doctor-patient relationship and information-seeking behavior: four orientations to cancer communication. J Palliat Care. 2018;33(2):79-87.
Kreitler S. Denial in cancer patients. Cancer Invest. 1999;17(7):514-534.
Lakhtakia R. Denial in Cancer-salutary or deleterious. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(2):406-407.
Bocquier A, Fressard L, Verger P, Legleye S, Peretti-Watel P. Alcohol and cancer: risk perception and risk denial beliefs among the French general population. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(4):705-710.
Haute Autorité de Santé Annoncer une mauvaise nouvelle [Internet]. 2018. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_698028/fr/annoncer-une-mauvaise-nouvelle. Accessed June 25, 2018.
Shilling V, Starkings R, Jenkins V, Cella D, Fallowfield L. Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(6):1655-1668.
Maddaléna F, Ogez D. Le rôle spécifique de l'infirmier coordinateur de soins en oncologie dans le dispositif d'annonce de maladie cancéreuse. Bull Infirm Cancer. 2013;13(3):86-90.
Fillion L, de Serres M, Lapointe-Goupil R, et al. Implantation d'une infirmière pivot en oncologie dans un centre hospitalier universitaire. Can Oncol Nurs J Rev Can Soins Infirm En Oncol. 2006;16(1):5-10.
Rieke K, Schmid KK, Lydiatt W, Houfek J, Boilesen E, Watanabe-Galloway S. Depression and survival in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2017;65:76-82.
Pourcel G, Bousquet P. Etude sur l'annonce du diagnostic de cancer et le ressenti des malades en 2011. Paris: Institut National du Cancer; 2012.
Buchakjian MR, Davis AB, Sciegienka SJ, Pagedar NA, Sperry SM. Longitudinal perioperative pain assessment in head and neck cancer surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017;126(9):646-653.
Mirabile A, Airoldi M, Ripamonti C, et al. Pain management in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy: clinical practical recommendations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;99:100-106.
Farhangfar A, Makarewicz M, Ghosh S, et al. Nutrition impact symptoms in a population cohort of head and neck cancer patients: multivariate regression analysis of symptoms on oral intake, weight loss and survival. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(9):877-883.
Klabunde CN, Han PKJ, Earle CC, et al. Physician roles in the cancer-related follow-up care of cancer survivors. Fam Med. 2013;45(7):463-474.
Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M. Use of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(8):779-785.
Shahvazi S, Onvani S, Heydari M, Mehrzad V, Nadjarzadeh A, Fallahzadeh H. Assessment of nutritional status using abridged scored patient-generated subjective global assessment in cancer patient. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(3):514-518.
Dąbrowska-Bender M, Słoniewski R, Religioni U, Juszczyk G, Słoniewska A, Staniszewska A. Analysis of quality of life subjective perception by patients treated for prostate cancer with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and QLQ-PR25 module. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(3):509-515.