Hyaluronan Dermal Fillers: Efforts Towards a Wider Biophysical Characterization and the Correlation of the Biophysical Parameters to the Clinical Outcome.

cohesivity degradation dermal filler palpability

Journal

Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology
ISSN: 1178-7015
Titre abrégé: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101543449

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 20 06 2019
accepted: 20 11 2019
entrez: 26 2 2020
pubmed: 26 2 2020
medline: 26 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hyaluronic Acid (HA) fillers are among the most used products in cosmetic medicine. Companies offer different formulations to allow full facial treatment and/or remodeling. Gels are being studied to establish the biophysical properties behind the specific clinical use and a correlation between the gel biophysical properties and their clinical performance. Clinicians' awareness is growing about the potential benefit deriving from such biophysical characterization. The Aliaxin The four gels of the line were investigated, for the first time, for their cohesivity and stability to Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). Additional secondary rheological parameters; evidence of relative water-uptake ability; and some clinical findings on product safety, palpability and duration of the aesthetic effect are provided. The gels proved highly cohesive and sensitive to ROS action with stability declining with the decrease in the overall gel elasticity. The G* and complex viscosity values at clinically relevant frequencies and gel water-uptake ability are consistent with the relative clinical indication related to gel projection and hydration capacity. Clinical outcomes showed the safety of the products and a perception of palpability well correlating with the cohesive/viscosity properties of the gels. A similar duration of the aesthetic effect (up to 1 year) was observed despite the diverse in vitro gel stability. The results broaden our knowledge of these gels and may contribute to optimize their clinical use towards the improvement of patient safety and satisfaction. Initial clinical observation indicated that gel biophysical properties allow for a reliable prediction of gel palpability, while in vitro data on gel stability cannot be related to the duration of the observed skin improvement. The latter finding further corroborates the idea of a skin restoration process activated by the gels besides the physical volumetric action.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32095081
doi: 10.2147/CCID.S220227
pii: 220227
pmc: PMC6995295
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

87-97

Informations de copyright

© 2020 La Gatta et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The material for in vitro experiments has been provided by IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Dermatol Surg. 2007 Dec;33 Suppl 2:S136-43; discussion S143
pubmed: 18086051
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5 Suppl):188S-195S
pubmed: 26441098
Facial Plast Surg. 2009 May;25(2):86-94
pubmed: 19415575
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):1224-33
pubmed: 25415091
Dermatol Ther. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):141-50
pubmed: 16784513
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016 Jan;104(1):9-18
pubmed: 25611588
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9
pubmed: 23687448
Dermatol Surg. 2009 Feb;35 Suppl 1:302-12
pubmed: 19207319
Arch Dermatol. 2007 Feb;143(2):155-63
pubmed: 17309996
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):208-17
pubmed: 22743885
Carbohydr Polym. 2016 Nov 20;153:275-283
pubmed: 27561497
Mol Biosyst. 2010 Mar;6(3):437-43
pubmed: 20174672
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Nov 1;68:565-572
pubmed: 27524055
Int J Biol Macromol. 2017 Oct;103:978-989
pubmed: 28549864
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul;142(1):112-121
pubmed: 29952893
Dermatol Surg. 2015 Apr;41 Suppl 1:S120-6
pubmed: 25828036
Acta Biomater. 2013 Jul;9(7):7081-92
pubmed: 23507088
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4 Suppl 2):5S-21S
pubmed: 24077013
Facial Plast Surg. 2009 Dec;25(5):324-8
pubmed: 20024874
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 11;14(6):e0218287
pubmed: 31185059
J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Sep;10(9):974-80
pubmed: 22052265
Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Dec;120(Pt B):1682-1695
pubmed: 30287361
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct;136(4):678-86
pubmed: 26397245
Ann Dermatol. 2014 Jun;26(3):357-62
pubmed: 24966636
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5 Suppl):149S-163S
pubmed: 26441095
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug;138(2):215e-27e
pubmed: 27465182
Dermatol Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1602-12
pubmed: 24093664
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Mar;133(3):658-667
pubmed: 23096713

Auteurs

Annalisa La Gatta (A)

Department Experimental Medicine, Section of Biotechnology, Medical Histology and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Italy.

Chiara Schiraldi (C)

Department Experimental Medicine, Section of Biotechnology, Medical Histology and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Italy.

Giovanna Zaccaria (G)

Private Practice, Milan, Italy.

Daniel Cassuto (D)

Private Practice, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH