Use of the Propeller Lumbar Perforator Flap: A Series of 32 Cases.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
31
03
2019
accepted:
11
09
2019
entrez:
26
2
2020
pubmed:
26
2
2020
medline:
26
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lumbosacral substance defect is a challenge in reconstructive surgery because few coverage solutions are available in this anatomical region. Lumbar artery perforator flaps (LAPs) have been progressively developed and make it possible to solve very complex situations. We report a multicenter study on LAP performed to treat medium and low lumbar defects of various etiologies, to highlight the versatility of this flap as well as its robustness and reproducibility. Between 2012 and 2019, 32 LAPs were performed in the Toulouse and Strasbourg University hospitals. Etiologies of the defects encountered were diverse: chronic wounds following neurosurgery, oncodermatology, burn sequelae, and ballistic injury. All LAPs were used in their pedicled form, turned as propeller, and combined or not with other flaps. We treated 31 patients with 32 LAPs. Average flap size was 14.3 cm (range 8-26) × 6.5 cm (range 5-10), and average arc of rotation was 131.3 degrees (range 70-180 degrees). Only 4 patients (12.9%) presented partial necrosis, but required no other covering procedure because secondary healing was sufficient. No coverage failure was reported. Average follow-up duration was 9.7 months (range 1-18). In the case of lumbosacral defects of various etiologies, propeller LAP is a reliable and efficient surgical procedure, offering the advantage of low donor site morbidity. The reconstructive surgeon should propose this technique to patients as a first-line option where surgery is indicated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32095384
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002522
pmc: PMC7015594
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e2522Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Oct;52(7):541-6
pubmed: 10658107
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Aug;68(8):1112-9
pubmed: 26066849
Indian J Plast Surg. 2016 Jan-Apr;49(1):91-4
pubmed: 27274129
Clin Plast Surg. 2003 Jul;30(3):371-82
pubmed: 12916594
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005 Feb;50(1):80-4; discussion 85
pubmed: 15695015
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 Apr;81(4):561-6
pubmed: 3279442
Br J Plast Surg. 2002 Apr;55(3):251-3
pubmed: 12041981
Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Jul;45(1):7-14
pubmed: 10917091
Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016 Apr 18;3(1):20-4
pubmed: 27583264
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Apr;101(4):987-91
pubmed: 9514331
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1529-44
pubmed: 20009839
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Jun;69(6):770-776
pubmed: 27105547
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug;138(2):383e-5e
pubmed: 27088839
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jun;95(7):1207-12
pubmed: 7761507
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2018 Feb;63(1):25-30
pubmed: 28802886
Br J Surg. 1970 Jul;57(7):502-8
pubmed: 4913490
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jan;123(1):79-86
pubmed: 19116539
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Dec;87(12):1035-1039
pubmed: 26999425
Acta Chir Belg. 2017 Aug;117(4):223-226
pubmed: 28636474
Burns. 2018 May;44(3):683-691
pubmed: 29089205
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;77(4):469-76
pubmed: 26545217
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Apr;123(4):1229-38
pubmed: 19337091
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013 Dec;58(6):644-9
pubmed: 23726251
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4):635e-45e
pubmed: 25357058