The uneven weight distribution between predators and prey: Comparing gut fill between terrestrial herbivores and carnivores.


Journal

Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology
ISSN: 1531-4332
Titre abrégé: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9806096

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 07 01 2020
revised: 03 02 2020
accepted: 20 02 2020
pubmed: 26 2 2020
medline: 4 3 2021
entrez: 26 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The general observation that secondary consumers ingest highly digestible food and have simple short guts and small abdominal cavities intuitively results in the assumption that mammalian carnivores carry less digesta in their gut compared to herbivores. Due to logistic constraints, this assumption has not been tested quantitatively so far. In this contribution, we estimated the dry matter gut contents (DMC) for 25 species of the order Carnivora (including two strictly herbivorous ones, the giant and the red panda) using the physical 'Occupancy Principle', based on a literature data collection on dry matter intake (DMI), apparent dry matter digestibility (aD DM) and retention time (RT), and compared the results to an existing collection for herbivores. Scaling exponents with body mass (BM) for both carnivores and herbivores were in the same range with DMI ~ BM

Identifiants

pubmed: 32097716
pii: S1095-6433(20)30035-0
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110683
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110683

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Annelies De Cuyper (A)

Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Carlo Meloro (C)

Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, England, UK.

Andrew J Abraham (AJ)

School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA.

Dennis W H Müller (DWH)

Zoologischer Garten Halle GmbH, D-06114 Halle (Saale), Germany.

Daryl Codron (D)

Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Geert P J Janssens (GPJ)

Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Marcus Clauss (M)

Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: mclauss@vetclinics.uzh.ch.

Articles similaires

Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH