Evaluation of the Surface Characteristics of Dental CAD/CAM Materials after Different Surface Treatments.
CAD/CAM materials
hydrofluoric acid etching
optical profilometry
sandblasting
scanning electron microscopy
surface roughness
surface treatment
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2020
22 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
04
02
2020
revised:
18
02
2020
accepted:
20
02
2020
entrez:
27
2
2020
pubmed:
27
2
2020
medline:
27
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology was developed to ensure the sufficient strength of tooth restorations, to improve esthetic restorations with a natural appearance and to make the techniques easier, faster and more accurate. In the view of the limited research on the surface treatments of the CAD/CAM materials and the need to evaluate the ideal surface characteristics of a material to achieve the best adhesion to tooth tissues, this study aimed to investigate the surface roughness and morphology of four different CAD/CAM materials using four different surface treatments. The CAD/CAM materials used in this study were three composites (Shofu Block HC, Lava Ultimate and Brilliant Crios) and a hybrid ceramic (Enamic). The surface of the specimens of each material received one of the following treatments: no surface treatment, sandblasting with 29 μm Al
Identifiants
pubmed: 32098305
pii: ma13040981
doi: 10.3390/ma13040981
pmc: PMC7078785
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
ID : 95390
Références
Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):529-34
pubmed: 22230107
J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(5):433-443
pubmed: 31517315
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov;22(8):2787-2797
pubmed: 29404810
Dent Mater. 2013 May;29(5):535-41
pubmed: 23522657
J Dent. 2007 Dec;35(12):897-902
pubmed: 17977638
Oper Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):171-8
pubmed: 26266652
Dent Mater. 2013 Apr;29(4):419-26
pubmed: 23410552
Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;63(2):175-197
pubmed: 30825985
Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):1-2
pubmed: 22133500
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Mar-Apr;15(2):159-67
pubmed: 11951806
J Dent Res. 2018 Sep;97(10):1082-1091
pubmed: 29906206
Quintessence Int. 2013 Apr 24;44(6):407
pubmed: 23882461
J Appl Oral Sci. 2005 Jun;13(2):101-9
pubmed: 20924531
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e485-e490
pubmed: 29430807
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Sep;70(3):224-33
pubmed: 8410729
J Adhes Dent. 2007;9 Suppl 2:269-73
pubmed: 18340985
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;10(3):211-217
pubmed: 29930791
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Oct;114(4):587-93
pubmed: 26141648
Dent Mater. 2017 Mar;33(3):e124-e135
pubmed: 28057347
Materials (Basel). 2016 Jul 07;9(7):
pubmed: 28773669
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jul;37(7):560-8
pubmed: 20136699
Quintessence Int. 2006 Feb;37(2):139-44
pubmed: 16475376
J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Oct;60(4):265-273
pubmed: 26973053
J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1232-4
pubmed: 25344335
Restor Dent Endod. 2014 Feb;39(1):12-6
pubmed: 24516824
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(6):796-813
pubmed: 26632228
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;26(6):382-93
pubmed: 24754327
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 23;2018:4893143
pubmed: 30426009
J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):289-302
pubmed: 27222889
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):227-36
pubmed: 26001334
Am J Dent. 2015 Dec;28(6):311-20
pubmed: 26846036
Oper Dent. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2):231-7
pubmed: 20420067
J Dent. 2010 Jan;38(1):29-38
pubmed: 19735692
J Dent Res. 2016 May;95(5):487-95
pubmed: 26933136
Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):73-81
pubmed: 27689770
Oper Dent. 2019 May/Jun;44(3):312-321
pubmed: 30444690
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):725-737
pubmed: 29770877
Dent Mater. 2003 Nov;19(7):575-83
pubmed: 12901980
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Dec;9(6):439-446
pubmed: 29279763
Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(1):9-20
pubmed: 25911826
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jul;30(4):281-286
pubmed: 29399950