Gait and fate: Baseline gait speed and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Gait speed
Meta-analysis
Mortality
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Journal
Journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1876-4738
Titre abrégé: J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8804703
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
13
10
2019
revised:
04
12
2019
accepted:
21
01
2020
pubmed:
27
2
2020
medline:
22
5
2021
entrez:
27
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine whether baseline gait speed predicts mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a meta-analysis of currently available studies was performed. To identify all studies researching the impact of preprocedural gait speed on mortality after TAVI, PubMed and Web of Science were searched through May 2019. Adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) hazard/odds ratios (ORs/HRs) with their confidence interval of mortality for slow (if available, the slowest) versus fast (if available, the fastest) gait speed (with cut-off values defined in each study) and those for unable to walk versus walker (if available, with the fastest gait speed) were extracted from each study, and then separately pooled by means of inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic ORs/HRs in the random-effects model. Twelve eligible studies (7 and 5 based on the distance-limited and time-limited walk test, respectively) were identified and integrated in the present meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of all ORs/HRs demonstrated that slow walkers (primary meta-analysis; OR/HR, 2.38; p < 0.00001) and unable to walk (OR/HR, 1.75; p = 0.01) were significantly associated with increased mortality. The subgroup analysis for the primary meta-analysis indicated no significant subgroup difference between studies utilizing the 4-m/5-m/15-foot walk test and those applying the 6-min walk test (p = 0.45). Combining studies with 1-year follow-up did not alter the primary result (p < 0.0001). Pooling studies with adjusted ORs/HRs did not change the principal result (p = 0.0002). No funnel plot asymmetry for the primary meta-analysis was identified. Slow baseline gait speed (and unable to walk) is associated with increased mortality after TAVI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To determine whether baseline gait speed predicts mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a meta-analysis of currently available studies was performed.
METHODS
To identify all studies researching the impact of preprocedural gait speed on mortality after TAVI, PubMed and Web of Science were searched through May 2019. Adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) hazard/odds ratios (ORs/HRs) with their confidence interval of mortality for slow (if available, the slowest) versus fast (if available, the fastest) gait speed (with cut-off values defined in each study) and those for unable to walk versus walker (if available, with the fastest gait speed) were extracted from each study, and then separately pooled by means of inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic ORs/HRs in the random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twelve eligible studies (7 and 5 based on the distance-limited and time-limited walk test, respectively) were identified and integrated in the present meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of all ORs/HRs demonstrated that slow walkers (primary meta-analysis; OR/HR, 2.38; p < 0.00001) and unable to walk (OR/HR, 1.75; p = 0.01) were significantly associated with increased mortality. The subgroup analysis for the primary meta-analysis indicated no significant subgroup difference between studies utilizing the 4-m/5-m/15-foot walk test and those applying the 6-min walk test (p = 0.45). Combining studies with 1-year follow-up did not alter the primary result (p < 0.0001). Pooling studies with adjusted ORs/HRs did not change the principal result (p = 0.0002). No funnel plot asymmetry for the primary meta-analysis was identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Slow baseline gait speed (and unable to walk) is associated with increased mortality after TAVI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32098749
pii: S0914-5087(20)30033-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.01.014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
600-605Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.