Beyond circles and squares: A commentary on updating pedigree nomenclature to better represent patient diversity.
access
attitudes
communication
community
cultural competence
disparities
diversity
education
family history
gender minorities
genetic counseling
genetics services
intersex
non-binary
pedigree nomenclature
psychosocial
transgender
underrepresented populations
Journal
Journal of genetic counseling
ISSN: 1573-3599
Titre abrégé: J Genet Couns
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9206865
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
27
11
2019
revised:
06
02
2020
accepted:
07
02
2020
pubmed:
28
2
2020
medline:
9
2
2021
entrez:
28
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With changes in our understanding of gender identity and disorders of sex differentiation (DSDs), as well as a need to promote medical care that appropriately reflects the intersectional personal identities of patients with respect to sex and gender, we explored possible modifications of pedigree nomenclature to better represent such patient diversity. There are currently no widely accepted standard symbols to simultaneously represent both gender identity and assigned sex at birth within a pedigree. Previous studies assessing perspectives from members of the transgender and gender non-binary (TGNB) community have highlighted the need for a unique symbol to represent non-binary individuals and better ways to represent core gender identities for gender minorities such as transgender individuals. In our experience we have encountered similar dilemmas with documentation for individuals with DSDs in terms of a lack of unequivocal symbolic representation within the pedigree. Here we propose three distinct symbols for gender identity combined with superscript symbols to represent sex assigned at birth, which we think may unequivocally represent TGNB individuals and patients with DSDs. It is clear that further research is needed to ensure that any proposed changes are acceptable by and respectful of all patients regardless of their gender identity and assigned sex at birth. We hope that further research will include focus groups and surveys to get broader input from gender minority stakeholders so that new standards can be developed and modified as we strive to meet the needs of our increasingly diverse patient population.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
435-439Informations de copyright
© 2020 National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Références
Barnes, H., Morris, E., & Austin, J. (2019). Trans-inclusive genetic counseling services: Recommendations from members of the transgender and non-binary community. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 00, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1187
Bennett, R. L., French, K. S., Resta, R. G., & Doyle, D. L. (2008). Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: Update and assessment of the recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(5), 424-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-008-9169-9
Berro, T., Zayhowski, K., Field, T., Channaoui, N., & Sotelo, J. (2019). Genetic counselors’ comfort and knowledge of cancer risk assessment for transgender patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 00, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1172
GLAAD (2011). GLAAD media reference guide-transgender. Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender
Provenzale, D., Gupta, S., Regenbogen, S. E., Hampel, H., Slavin, T. P., Hall, M. J. … Ogba, N. (2017). National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Colorectal, 3.2017.
UCSF Center of Excellence for Transgender Health (2016). Terminology and definitions. Retrieved from http://transhealth.ucsf.edu/trans?page=guidelines-terminology
Zayhowski, K., Park, J., Boehmer, U., Gabriel, C., Berro, T., & Campion, M. (2019). Cancer genetic counselors’ experiences with transgender patients: A qualitative study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 28(3), 641-653. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1092