Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, "We Can Quit 2": A systematic review protocol.
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Community-based Intervention
Feasibility study
Pilot trial
Smoking Cessation
Social and Health Inequalities
Systematic Review.
Women and Smoking
Journal
HRB open research
ISSN: 2515-4826
Titre abrégé: HRB Open Res
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 101754913
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
accepted:
23
05
2019
entrez:
28
2
2020
pubmed:
28
2
2020
medline:
28
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in Ireland with almost 6,000 smokers dying each year from smoking-related diseases. Amongst younger Irish women, smoking rates are considerably higher in those from socially disadvantaged areas compared to women from affluent areas. Women from poorer areas also experience higher rates of lung cancer. To our knowledge, there are no peer reviewed published systematic reviews on the effectiveness of interventions tailored to reduce smoking rates in women from disadvantaged areas. This systematic review protocol will aim to examine the effectiveness of such interventions and to describe trial processes such as recruitment, follow-up and dropout prevention strategies, as well as barriers and enablers of successful implementation. A systematic review will be conducted of peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials and associated process evaluations of smoking cessation interventions designed for women living in socially disadvantaged areas. If the search returns, less than five studies are review criteria will expand to include quasi-experimental studies. A number of databases of scholarly literature will be searched from inception using a detailed search strategy. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles to identify relevant studies using a pre-defined checklist based on PICOS. In the case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be consulted. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) criteria. Quantitative data will be extracted and, if comparable, will be assessed using meta-analysis. A narrative meta-synthesis of qualitative data will be conducted. This review aims to synthesise information from relevant studies on smoking cessation interventions tailored for women from socially disadvantaged areas. The evidence obtained from studies and presented in this review will help guide future research in this area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32104776
doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12901.1
pmc: PMC7017191
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
10Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Burke E et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No competing interests were disclosed.
Références
Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2971-80
pubmed: 12325113
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 24;3:82
pubmed: 25056145
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2
pubmed: 21185693
Tob Control. 2013 Sep;22(5):356-60
pubmed: 22649182
Women Health. 2012;52(1):32-54
pubmed: 22324357
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Jul;70(1):159-63
pubmed: 10884544
Psychol Health. 2010 Oct;25(8):889-92
pubmed: 20954100
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):124-31
pubmed: 22406196
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:135-140
pubmed: 27471021
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92
pubmed: 10982317