Point-of-care HIV viral load testing combined with task shifting to improve treatment outcomes (STREAM): findings from an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.
Journal
The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
17
09
2019
revised:
27
10
2019
accepted:
15
11
2019
pubmed:
28
2
2020
medline:
29
8
2020
entrez:
28
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Monitoring HIV treatment with laboratory testing introduces delays for providing appropriate care in resource-limited settings. The aim of our study was to determine whether point-of-care HIV viral load testing with task shifting changed treatment and care outcomes for adults on antiretroviral therapy (ART) when compared with standard laboratory viral load testing. We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in a public clinic in Durban, South Africa. We enrolled HIV-positive adults (aged ≥18 years) who presented for their first routine HIV viral load test 6 months after ART initiation. Individuals were randomly assigned by a random number allocation sequence to receive either point-of-care viral load testing at enrolment and after 6 months with task shifting to enrolled nurses (intervention group), or laboratory viral load testing (standard-of-care group). The primary outcome was combined viral suppression (<200 copies per mL) and retention at 12 months after enrolment. A non-inferiority margin of 10% was used. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03066128. Between Feb 24, 2017, and Aug 23, 2017, we screened 657 participants, and 390 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=195) or standard-of-care group (n=195). 175 (90%) individuals in the intervention group and 148 (76%) individuals in the standard-of-care group had the primary outcome of retention with viral suppression, a difference of 13·9% (95% CI 6·4-21·2; p<0·00040). 182 participants (93%) in the intervention group had viral suppression compared with 162 (83%) in the standard-of-care group (difference 10·3%, 3·9-16·8; p=0·0025); 180 (92%) and 162 (85%) were retained in care (7·7%, 1·3-14·2; p=0·026). There were no adverse events related to point-of-care HIV viral load testing or task shifting. Point-of-care viral load testing combined with task shifting significantly improved viral suppression and retention in HIV care. Point-of-care testing can simplify treatment and improve outcomes for HIV-positive adults receiving ART in resource-limited settings. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Monitoring HIV treatment with laboratory testing introduces delays for providing appropriate care in resource-limited settings. The aim of our study was to determine whether point-of-care HIV viral load testing with task shifting changed treatment and care outcomes for adults on antiretroviral therapy (ART) when compared with standard laboratory viral load testing.
METHODS
We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in a public clinic in Durban, South Africa. We enrolled HIV-positive adults (aged ≥18 years) who presented for their first routine HIV viral load test 6 months after ART initiation. Individuals were randomly assigned by a random number allocation sequence to receive either point-of-care viral load testing at enrolment and after 6 months with task shifting to enrolled nurses (intervention group), or laboratory viral load testing (standard-of-care group). The primary outcome was combined viral suppression (<200 copies per mL) and retention at 12 months after enrolment. A non-inferiority margin of 10% was used. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03066128.
FINDINGS
Between Feb 24, 2017, and Aug 23, 2017, we screened 657 participants, and 390 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=195) or standard-of-care group (n=195). 175 (90%) individuals in the intervention group and 148 (76%) individuals in the standard-of-care group had the primary outcome of retention with viral suppression, a difference of 13·9% (95% CI 6·4-21·2; p<0·00040). 182 participants (93%) in the intervention group had viral suppression compared with 162 (83%) in the standard-of-care group (difference 10·3%, 3·9-16·8; p=0·0025); 180 (92%) and 162 (85%) were retained in care (7·7%, 1·3-14·2; p=0·026). There were no adverse events related to point-of-care HIV viral load testing or task shifting.
INTERPRETATION
Point-of-care viral load testing combined with task shifting significantly improved viral suppression and retention in HIV care. Point-of-care testing can simplify treatment and improve outcomes for HIV-positive adults receiving ART in resource-limited settings.
FUNDING
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32105625
pii: S2352-3018(19)30402-3
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30402-3
pmc: PMC7183312
mid: NIHMS1567480
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03066128']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e229-e237Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI027757
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R21 AI124719
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2017 Dec;33(12):1181-1184
pubmed: 28793781
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Nov;20 Suppl 7:
pubmed: 29130601
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Jun 1;72(2):e45-8
pubmed: 26959192
J Virol Methods. 2017 Jun;244:39-45
pubmed: 28274744
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Nov 27;64(46):1287-90
pubmed: 26605986
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 16;6(8):e011999
pubmed: 27531735
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e017507
pubmed: 28963304
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0201341
pubmed: 30231022
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Aug;54(8):2104-8
pubmed: 27252459
Implement Sci. 2012 Jul 16;7:66
pubmed: 22800379
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Mar 26;56(4):
pubmed: 29386266
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 15;32(3):
pubmed: 31092508
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 23;15:118
pubmed: 26001915
Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):873-90
pubmed: 9595617
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 21;20(Suppl 4):22024
pubmed: 28770588
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;14(3):239-49
pubmed: 24332389