Circadian analysis of the mouse retinal pigment epithelium transcriptome.
Circadian
Mouse
Retinal pigment epithelium
Transcriptome
Journal
Experimental eye research
ISSN: 1096-0007
Titre abrégé: Exp Eye Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370707
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
12
12
2019
revised:
21
02
2020
accepted:
21
02
2020
pubmed:
28
2
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
28
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The presence of a phagocytic peak of photoreceptor outer segments by the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) one or 2 h after the onset of light has been reported for several diurnal and nocturnal species. This peak in phagocytic activity also persists under constant lighting conditions (i.e., constant light or dark) thus demonstrating that the timing of this peak is driven by a circadian clock. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in RPE whole transcriptome at two different circadian times (CT; 1 h before (CT23) and 1 h after (CT1) subjective light onset). C57BL/6J male mice were maintained in constant dark conditions for three days and euthanized under red light (<1 lux) at CT23 and CT1. RPE was isolated from whole eyes for RNA library preparation and sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq4000 platform. 14,083 mouse RPE transcripts were detected in common between CT23 and CT1. 12,005 were protein coding transcripts and 2078 were non-protein coding transcripts. 2421 protein coding transcripts were significantly upregulated whereas only 3 transcripts were significantly downregulated and 12 non-protein coding transcripts were significantly upregulated and 31 non-protein coding transcripts were significantly downregulated at CT1 when compared to CT23 (p < 0.05, fold change ≥ ±2.0). Of the protein coding transcripts, most of them were characterized as: enzymes, kinases, and transcriptional regulators with a large majority of activity in the cytoplasm, nucleus, and plasma membrane. Non-protein coding transcripts included biotypes such as long-non coding RNAs and pseudogenes. Gene ontology analysis and ingenuity pathway analysis revealed that differentially expressed transcripts were associated with integrin signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, protein phosphorylation, and actin cytoskeleton remodeling suggesting that these previously identified phagocytic pathways are under circadian control. Our analysis identified new pathways (e.g., increased mitochondrial respiration via increased oxidative phosphorylation) that may be involved in the circadian control of phagocytic activity. In addition, our dataset suggests a possible regulatory role for the identified non-protein coding transcripts in mediating the complex function of RPE phagocytosis. Finally, our results also indicate, as seen in other tissues, about 20% of the whole RPE transcriptome may be under circadian clock regulation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32105725
pii: S0014-4835(19)30906-6
doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.107988
pmc: PMC7372111
mid: NIHMS1600123
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Eye Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107988Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY026291
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54 NS083932
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : U54 MD007602
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : G12 MD007602
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54 NS034194
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY006360
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):344-52
pubmed: 24429633
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):4856-4870
pubmed: 30347082
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;50(7):3495-502
pubmed: 19234351
Elife. 2015 Dec 19;4:e08890
pubmed: 26687005
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):16219-24
pubmed: 25349387
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Jul;34(8):2392-401
pubmed: 7686891
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5103
pubmed: 28698578
Vis Neurosci. 2002 Sep-Oct;19(5):593-601
pubmed: 12507326
Yale J Biol Med. 2019 Jun 27;92(2):233-240
pubmed: 31249484
J Exp Med. 2004 Dec 20;200(12):1539-45
pubmed: 15596525
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979 Oct;18(10):1019-24
pubmed: 478775
Science. 1976 Dec 3;194(4269):1071-4
pubmed: 982063
Exp Eye Res. 2017 Dec;165:90-95
pubmed: 28941766
Front Immunol. 2017 May 08;8:527
pubmed: 28533780
Front Genet. 2015 Feb 04;5:476
pubmed: 25699073
Vis Neurosci. 1999 Sep-Oct;16(5):909-18
pubmed: 10580726
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Sep 18;43(16):7664-74
pubmed: 26202970
Mol Vis. 2004 Jul 06;10:439-44
pubmed: 15257269
Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):78-83
pubmed: 11967526
FASEB J. 2013 Nov;27(11):4585-95
pubmed: 23913857
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Oct;44(10):1054-1066
pubmed: 31136724
BMC Cell Biol. 2018 Nov 20;19(1):25
pubmed: 30458707
Mol Vis. 2010 Dec 07;16:2605-11
pubmed: 21151601
Exp Eye Res. 1981 Jan;32(1):1-10
pubmed: 7215466
Brain Res. 1993 Mar 12;605(2):256-64
pubmed: 8481775
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 17;104(29):12005-10
pubmed: 17620600
Science. 1983 Mar 18;219(4590):1341-3
pubmed: 6828862
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0141597
pubmed: 26517551
Front Immunol. 2017 Jan 31;8:61
pubmed: 28197151
J Transl Med. 2018 Mar 13;16(1):63
pubmed: 29534722
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Mar;18(3):164-179
pubmed: 27990019
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980 Nov;19(11):1268-73
pubmed: 7429763
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Mar;36(3):730-6
pubmed: 7890503
Curr Mol Med. 2010 Dec;10(9):802-23
pubmed: 21091424
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8145-8
pubmed: 22566632
Neurochem Int. 1995 Sep;27(3):253-62
pubmed: 8520464
J Gen Physiol. 1982 May;79(5):775-90
pubmed: 6284860
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1699:45-66
pubmed: 29086367
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 May 11;61(5):10
pubmed: 32396631
Stem Cells. 2016 Feb;34(2):367-79
pubmed: 26523756
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3793
pubmed: 30846767