Ultra-deep Coverage Single-molecule R-loop Footprinting Reveals Principles of R-loop Formation.


Journal

Journal of molecular biology
ISSN: 1089-8638
Titre abrégé: J Mol Biol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 2985088R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 03 2020
Historique:
received: 22 08 2019
revised: 27 01 2020
accepted: 06 02 2020
pubmed: 28 2 2020
medline: 28 8 2020
entrez: 28 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

R-loops are a prevalent class of non-B DNA structures that have been associated with both positive and negative cellular outcomes. DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) approaches based on the anti-DNA:RNA hybrid S9.6 antibody revealed that R-loops form dynamically over conserved genic hotspots. We have developed an orthogonal approach that queries R-loops via the presence of long stretches of single-stranded DNA on their looped-out strand. Nondenaturing sodium bisulfite treatment catalyzes the conversion of unpaired cytosines to uracils, creating permanent genetic tags for the position of an R-loop. Long-read, single-molecule PacBio sequencing allows the identification of R-loop 'footprints' at near nucleotide resolution in a strand-specific manner on long single DNA molecules and at ultra-deep coverage. Single-molecule R-loop footprinting coupled with PacBio sequencing (SMRF-seq) revealed a strong agreement between S9.6-based and bisulfite-based R-loop mapping and confirmed that R-loops form over genic hotspots, including gene bodies and terminal gene regions. Based on the largest single-molecule R-loop dataset to date, we show that individual R-loops form nonrandomly, defining discrete sets of overlapping molecular clusters that pileup through larger R-loop zones. R-loops most often map to intronic regions and their individual start and stop positions do not match with intron-exon boundaries, reinforcing the model that they form cotranscriptionally from unspliced transcripts. SMRF-seq further established that R-loop distribution patterns are not simply driven by intrinsic DNA sequence features but most likely also reflect DNA topological constraints. Overall, DRIP-based and SMRF-based approaches independently provide a complementary and congruent view of R-loop distribution, consolidating our understanding of the principles underlying R-loop formation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32105733
pii: S0022-2836(20)30164-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.02.014
pmc: PMC7669280
mid: NIHMS1568681
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA 63231-63-0
DNA 9007-49-2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2271-2288

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM120607
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM008799
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Références

J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 21;269(3):2068-74
pubmed: 8294458
Mol Cell. 2011 Jun 24;42(6):794-805
pubmed: 21700224
Mol Cell. 2016 Jul 7;63(1):167-78
pubmed: 27373332
Genome Res. 2013 Oct;23(10):1590-600
pubmed: 23868195
Genome Biol. 2018 Jul 30;19(1):100
pubmed: 30060749
J Mol Biol. 2017 Oct 27;429(21):3168-3180
pubmed: 27600412
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015 Jun;34:39-45
pubmed: 25938907
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024-7
pubmed: 2823250
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Aug 11;22(15):2990-7
pubmed: 8065911
Mol Cell. 2012 Mar 30;45(6):814-25
pubmed: 22387027
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6260-6269
pubmed: 30850542
Oncogene. 2005 Sep 1;24(38):5791-8
pubmed: 15940261
J Bacteriol. 2008 Nov;190(22):7346-56
pubmed: 18790862
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015 Dec;22(12):999-1007
pubmed: 26551076
Nat Plants. 2017 Sep;3(9):704-714
pubmed: 28848233
Mol Immunol. 2013 Jun;54(2):208-16
pubmed: 23287599
J Mol Recognit. 2013 Aug;26(8):376-81
pubmed: 23784994
Trends Cell Biol. 2015 Sep;25(9):514-22
pubmed: 26045257
Cell Rep. 2018 May 8;23(6):1891-1905
pubmed: 29742442
Mol Cell. 2017 Aug 17;67(4):608-621.e6
pubmed: 28757210
Genome Res. 2013 Jan;23(1):121-8
pubmed: 23064752
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9464-8
pubmed: 2849106
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Nov 16;43(20):9729-41
pubmed: 26253743
Genes Dev. 2014 Jul 1;28(13):1384-96
pubmed: 24990962
Cell Syst. 2017 Mar 22;4(3):344-356.e7
pubmed: 28237796
Mol Cell. 2009 Jul 31;35(2):228-39
pubmed: 19647519
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Oct;16(10):583-97
pubmed: 26370899
Elife. 2016 Aug 23;5:
pubmed: 27552054
Elife. 2017 Oct 26;6:
pubmed: 29072160
Mol Cell. 2003 Sep;12(3):711-21
pubmed: 14527416
Mol Biosyst. 2008 Jun;4(6):686-91
pubmed: 18493667
Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Jan;30(1):146-59
pubmed: 19841062
J Biol Chem. 1997 May 9;272(19):12816-23
pubmed: 9139742
Nat Protoc. 2019 Jun;14(6):1734-1755
pubmed: 31053798
Mol Cell. 2017 Nov 16;68(4):745-757.e5
pubmed: 29104020
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013 Mar;20(3):396-403
pubmed: 23416947
Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Jan;28(1):50-60
pubmed: 17954560
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 26;47(13):6783-6795
pubmed: 31066439
FEBS J. 2009 Mar;276(6):1494-505
pubmed: 19228196
Genes Dev. 2010 Jul 15;24(14):1546-58
pubmed: 20634320
Nat Immunol. 2003 May;4(5):442-51
pubmed: 12679812
DNA Repair (Amst). 2018 Nov;71:69-81
pubmed: 30190235
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013 Mar;20(3):387-95
pubmed: 23416946
Elife. 2015 Jul 16;4:
pubmed: 26182405
Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):342-4
pubmed: 1701219
Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Jun;29(11):3124-33
pubmed: 19307304
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D119-D127
pubmed: 27899586
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun 1;27(11):1571-2
pubmed: 21493656
Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Dec 25;23(24):5006-11
pubmed: 8559658
Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Aug;27(16):5921-32
pubmed: 17562862
J Immunol Methods. 1986 May 1;89(1):123-30
pubmed: 2422282
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Aug;76(8):3870-4
pubmed: 226985
J Mol Biol. 2018 Feb 2;430(3):272-284
pubmed: 29289567
Genes Dev. 2004 Jul 1;18(13):1618-29
pubmed: 15231739
Genome Res. 2018 Sep;28(9):1405-1414
pubmed: 30108179
Cell. 2017 Aug 10;170(4):774-786.e19
pubmed: 28802045
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 5;112(18):5785-90
pubmed: 25902512
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 28;103(13):5030-5
pubmed: 16547142

Auteurs

Maika Malig (M)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Integrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Stella R Hartono (SR)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Jenna M Giafaglione (JM)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Lionel A Sanz (LA)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Frederic Chedin (F)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: flchedin@ucdavis.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH