Action information contributes to metacognitive decision-making.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 02 2020
27 02 2020
Historique:
received:
02
11
2019
accepted:
10
02
2020
entrez:
29
2
2020
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
21
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Metacognitive abilities allow us to adjust ongoing behavior and modify future decisions in the absence of external feedback. Although metacognition is critical in many daily life settings, it remains unclear what information is actually being monitored and what kind of information is being used for metacognitive decisions. In the present study, we investigated whether response information connected to perceptual events contribute to metacognitive decision-making. Therefore, we recorded EEG signals during a perceptual color discrimination task while participants were asked to provide an estimate about the quality of their decision on each trial. Critically, the moment participants provided their confidence judgments varied across conditions, thereby changing the amount of action information (e.g., response competition or response fluency) available for metacognitive decisions. Results from three experiments demonstrate that metacognitive performance improved when first-order action information was available at the moment metacognitive decisions about the perceptual task had to be provided. This behavioral effect was accompanied by enhanced functional connectivity (beta phase synchrony) between motor areas and prefrontal regions, exclusively observed during metacognitive decision-making. Our findings demonstrate that action information contributes to metacognitive decision-making, thereby painting a picture of metacognition as a process that integrates sensory evidence and information about our interactions with the world.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32107455
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60382-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-60382-y
pmc: PMC7046793
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3632Références
Morales, J., Lau, H. & Fleming, S. M. Domain-General and Domain-Specific Patterns of Activity Supporting Metacognition in Human Prefrontal Cortex. J. Neurosci. 38, 3534–3546 (2018).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2360-17.2018
pubmed: 5895040
pmcid: 5895040
Vaccaro, A. G. & Fleming, S. M. Thinking about thinking: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 2, 1–14 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/2398212818810591
Rouault, M., Mcwilliams, A., Allen, M. G. & Fleming, S. M. Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging. Pers. Neurosci. 1–28 (2018).
Kiani, R. & Shadlen, M. N. Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex. Science (80-.). 324, 759–764 (2009).
doi: 10.1126/science.1169405
pubmed: 2738936
pmcid: 2738936
Yeung, N. & Summerfield, C. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 1310–1321 (2012).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0416
Fetsch, C. R., Kiani, R., Newsome, W. & Shadlen, M. N. Effects of Cortical Microstimulation on Confidence in a Perceptual Decision. Neuron 83, 797–804 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.011
pubmed: 4141901
pmcid: 4141901
Wierzchoń, M., Paulewicz, B., Asanowicz, D., Timmermans, B. & Cleeremans, A. Different subjective awareness measures demonstrate the influence of visual identification on perceptual awareness ratings. Conscious. Cogn. 27C, 109–120 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.009
Fleming, S. M. et al. Action-Specific Disruption of Perceptual Confidence. Psychol. Sci. 26, 89–98 (2015).
doi: 10.1177/0956797614557697
pubmed: 4361353
pmcid: 4361353
Wokke, M. E., Cleeremans, A. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. Sure I’m Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making. J. Neurosci. 37, 781–789 (2017).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1612-16.2016
pubmed: 6597021
pmcid: 6597021
Berg, R. V. D., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M. N. & Wolpert, D. M. Confidence is the bridge between multi-stage decisions. Curr. Biol. 26, 3157–3168 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.021
pubmed: 5154755
pmcid: 5154755
Palser, E. R., Fotopoulou, A. & Kilner, J. M. Altering movement parameters disrupts metacognitive accuracy. Conscious. Cogn. 57, 33–40 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.11.005
Maniscalco, B. & Lau, H. The signal processing architecture underlying subjective reports of sensory awareness. Neurosci. of Consci. 1, 1–17 (2016).
Cisek, P. & Kalaska, J. F. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45, 801–814 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.027
Maniscalco, B. et al. Tuned normalization in perceptual decision-making circuits can explain seemingly suboptimal confidence behavior. bioRxiv: 558858 (2019).
Allen, M. et al. Unexpected arousal modulates the influence of sensory noise on confidence. Elife 5 (2016).
Urai, A. E., Braun, A. & Donner, T. H. Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias. Nat. Commun. 8, 14637 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14637
pubmed: 28256514
pmcid: 5337963
Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B. & Wierzchoń, M. But I Was So Sure! Metacognitive Judgments Are Less Accurate Given Prospectively than Retrospectively. Front. Psychol. 7, 218 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00218
pubmed: 4759291
pmcid: 4759291
Pasquali, A., Timmermans, B. & Cleeremans, A. Know thyself: Metacognitive networks and measures of consciousness. Cognition 117, 182–190 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.010
Fleming, S. M. & Daw, N. D. Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychol. Rev. 124, 91–114 (2017).
doi: 10.1037/rev0000045
pubmed: 5178868
pmcid: 5178868
Pfurtscheller, G. & Lopes da Silva, F. H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 1842–57 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
Donner, T. H., Siegel, M., Fries, P. & Engel, A. K. Buildup of Choice-Predictive Activity in Human Motor Cortex during Perceptual Decision Making. Curr. Biol. 19, 1581–1585 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.066
Tzagarakis, C., Ince, N. F., Leuthold, A. C. & Pellizzer, G. Beta-Band Activity during Motor Planning Reflects Response Uncertainty. J. Neurosci. 30, 11270–11277 (2010).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6026-09.2010
pubmed: 6633326
pmcid: 6633326
Donner, T. H. et al. Population Activity in the Human Dorsal Pathway Predicts the Accuracy of Visual Motion Detection. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 345–359 (2007).
doi: 10.1152/jn.01141.2006
Haegens, S., Nácher, V., Luna, R., Romo, R. & Jensen, O. α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19377–82 (2011).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117190108
Siegel, M., Donner, T. H. & Engel, A. K. Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 20–25 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nrn3137
Engel, A. K. & Fries, P. Beta-band oscillations — signalling the status quo? Curr. op. in neurobiol. 20, 156–165 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015
Kloosterman, N. A. et al. Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion. J. Neurophysiol. 113, 1063–76 (2015).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2014
Spitzer, B. & Haegens, S. Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation. eneuro 4, ENEURO.0170-17.2017 (2017).
Wenke, D., Fleming, S. M. & Haggard, P. Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition 115, 26–38 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.016
Fleming, S. M. & Lau, H. How to measure metacognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8 (2014).
Hebart, M. N., Schriever, Y., Donner, T. H. & Haynes, J.-D. The Relationship between Perceptual Decision Variables and Confidence in the Human Brain. Cereb. Cortex (2014).
Brinkman, L., Stolk, A., Dijkerman, H. C., de Lange, F. P. & Toni, I. Distinct roles for alpha- and beta-band oscillations during mental simulation of goal-directed actions. J. Neurosci. 34, 14783–92 (2014).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2039-14.2014
pubmed: 4212072
pmcid: 4212072
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1105–1107 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nn.2886
Boldt, A., de Gardelle, V. & Yeung, N. The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 43, 1520–1531 (2017).
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000404
pubmed: 5524444
pmcid: 5524444
Macmillan, N. & Creelman, C. Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. (Psychology Press, 2004).
Kepecs, A., Uchida, N., Zariwala, H. A. & Mainen, Z. F. Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 455, 227–31 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nature07200
pubmed: 18690210
pmcid: 18690210
Boldt, A. & Yeung, N. Shared Neural Markers of Decision Confidence and Error Detection. J. Neurosci. 35, 3478–3484 (2015).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0797-14.2015
pubmed: 25716847
pmcid: 25716847
Calderon, C. B., Gevers, W. & Verguts, T. The Unfolding Action Model of Initiation Times, Movement Times, and Movement Paths. Psychol. Rev. 125, 785–805 (2018).
doi: 10.1037/rev0000110
Pleskac, T. J. & Busemeyer, J. R. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychol. Rev. 117, 864–901 (2010).
doi: 10.1037/a0019737
Charles, L., King, J.-R. & Dehaene, S. Decoding the dynamics of action, intention, and error detection for conscious and subliminal stimuli. J. Neurosci. 34, 1158–70 (2014).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2465-13.2014
pubmed: 5635966
pmcid: 5635966
Zylberberg, A., Barttfeld, P., Sigman, M. & Pereira, A. The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision. Front. int. neurosci. 6, 1–10 (2012).
Maniscalco, B., Peters, M. A. K. & Lau, H. Heuristic use of perceptual evidence leads to dissociation between performance and metacognitive sensitivity. Atten Percept Psychophys 923–937 (2016).
Simon, D. A. & Bjork, R. A. Metacognition in Motor Learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27, 907–912 (2001).
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.907
Kilavik, B. E., Zaepffel, M., Brovelli, A., MacKay, W. A. & Riehle, A. The ups and downs of beta oscillations in sensorimotor cortex. Exp. Neurol. 245, 15–26 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.09.014
Gilbertson, T. et al. Existing Motor State Is Favored at the Expense of New Movement during 13-35 Hz Oscillatory Synchrony in the Human Corticospinal System. J. Neurosci. 25, 7771–7779 (2005).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1762-05.2005
pubmed: 6725263
pmcid: 6725263
Koelewijn, T., van Schie, H. T., Bekkering, H., Oostenveld, R. & Jensen, O. Motor-cortical beta oscillations are modulated by correctness of observed action. Neuroimage 40, 767–775 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.018
Swann, N. et al. Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses. J. Neurosci. 29, 12675–85 (2009).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3359-09.2009
pubmed: 2801605
pmcid: 2801605
Piantoni, G., Kline, K. A. & Eagleman, D. M. Beta oscillations correlate with the probability of perceiving rivalrous visual stimuli. J. Vis. 10, 18–18 (2010).
doi: 10.1167/10.13.18
Bastos, A. M. et al. Visual Areas Exert Feedforward and Feedback Influences through Distinct Frequency Channels. Neuron 85, 390–401 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.018
Siegel, M., Warden, M. R. & Miller, E. K. Phase-dependent neuronal coding of objects in short-term memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21341–6 (2009).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908193106
Hanslmayr, S., Staresina, B. P. & Bowman, H. Oscillations and Episodic Memory: Addressing the Synchronization/Desynchronization Conundrum. Trends Neurosci. 39, 16–25 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.11.004
pubmed: 4819444
pmcid: 4819444
Wyart, V., Myers, N. E. & Summerfield, C. Neural Mechanisms of Human Perceptual Choice Under Focused and Divided Attention. J. Neurosci. 35, 3485–3498 (2015).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3276-14.2015
pubmed: 4402727
pmcid: 4402727
Benchenane, K., Tiesinga, P. H. & Battaglia, F. P. Oscillations in the prefrontal cortex: a gateway to memory and attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 475–485 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.01.004
Thompson, E. & Varela, F. J. Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 418–425 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
Tsuchiya, N., Wilke, M., Frässle, S. & Lamme, V. A. F. No-Report Paradigms: Extracting the True Neural Correlates of Consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 757–770 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.002
Fleming, S. M. & Dolan, R. J. The neural basis of metacognitive ability. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 367, 1338–49 (2012).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0417
pubmed: 3318765
pmcid: 3318765
Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., Harty, S. & O’Connell, R. G. Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments. Elife 4 (2015).
Fleming, S. M., Huijgen, J. & Dolan, R. J. Prefrontal Contributions to Metacognition in Perceptual Decision Making. J. Neurosci. 32, 6117–6125 (2012).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6489-11.2012
pubmed: 3359781
pmcid: 3359781
Desender, K., Van Opstal, F. & Van den Bussche, E. Feeling the conflict: the crucial role of conflict experience in adaptation. Psychol. Sci. 25, 675–83 (2014).
doi: 10.1177/0956797613511468
Questienne, L., Opstal, F. V. & Dijck, J. V. Metacognition and cognitive control: behavioural adaptation requires conflict experience. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1–15 (2016).
Susser, J. A. & Mulligan, N. W. The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22, 1014–1019 (2015).
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0768-1
Hagura, N., Haggard, P. & City, S. Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act. Elife, 1–20 (2017).
Desender, K., Calderon, C. B., Van Opstal, F. & Van den Bussche, E. Avoiding the conflict: Metacognitive awareness drives the selection of low-demand contexts. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 43, 1397 (2017).
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000391
Pacherie, E. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 107, 179–217 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003
Lange, F. P. D., Rahnev, D. A., Donner, T. H. & Lau, H. Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity over Motor Cortex Reflects Perceptual Expectations. J. Neurosci. 33, 1400–1410 (2013).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1094-12.2013
pubmed: 6618755
pmcid: 6618755
Song, J. & Nakayama, K. Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 360–366 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009
Fleming, S. M. et al. Action-Specific Disruption of Perceptual Confidence. Psychol. Sci. 26, 89–98 (2014).
doi: 10.1177/0956797614557697
Pannu, J. K. & Kaszniak, A. W. Metamemory Experiments in Neurological Populations: A Review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 15, 105–130 (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s11065-005-7091-6
Rounis, E., Maniscalco, B., Rothwell, J. C., Passingham, R. E. & Lau, H. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal cortex impairs metacognitive visual awareness. Cogn. Neurosci. 1, 165–75 (2010).
doi: 10.1080/17588921003632529
Ryals, A. J., Rogers, L. M., Gross, E. Z., Polnaszek, K. L. & Voss, J. L. Associative Recognition Memory Awareness Improved by Theta-Burst Stimulation of Frontopolar Cortex. Cereb. Cortex 26, 1200–1210 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu311
Shekhar, M. & Rahnev, D. Distinguishing the Roles of Dorsolateral and Anterior PFC in Visual Metacognition. J. Neurosci. 38, 5078–5087 (2018).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3484-17.2018
pubmed: 6705938
pmcid: 6705938
Bor, D., Schwartzman, D. J., Barrett, A. B. & Seth, A. K. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal or parietal cortex does not impair metacognitive visual awareness. PLoS One 12, e0171793 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171793
pubmed: 5305100
pmcid: 5305100
Ruby, E., Maniscalco, B. & Peters, M. A. K. On a ‘failed’ attempt to manipulate visual metacognition with transcranial magnetic stimulation to prefrontal cortex. Conscious. Cogn. 62, 34–41 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.009
pubmed: 5964034
pmcid: 5964034
Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J. & Blanke, L. Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78, 447–455 (1991).
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9
Bates, A. T., Kiehl, K. A., Laurens, K. R. & Liddle, P. F. Low-frequency EEG oscillations associated with information processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 115, 222–230 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.09.036
Cohen, M. X., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Haupt, S., Elger, C. E. & Fell, J. Medial frontal cortex and response conflict: Evidence from human intracranial EEG and medial frontal cortex lesion. Brain Res. 1238, 127–142 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.114
Cohen, M. X. & Cavanagh, J. F. Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict. Front. Psychol. 2, 30 (2011).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00030
pubmed: 3111011
pmcid: 3111011
Cavanagh, J. F., Cohen, M. X. & Allen, J. J. B. Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring. J. Neurosci. 29, 98–105 (2009).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4137-08.2009
pubmed: 2742325
pmcid: 2742325
Luu, P. & Tucker, D. M. Regulating action: alternating activation of midline frontal and motor cortical networks. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 1295–306 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00559-4
Jensen, O. & Lisman, J. E. Position Reconstruction From an Ensemble of Hippocampal Place Cells: Contribution of Theta Phase Coding. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 2602–2609 (2000).
doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2602
Cavanagh, J. F. & Frank, M. J. Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 414–421 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
pubmed: 4112145
pmcid: 4112145
Dragoi, G. & Buzsáki, G. Temporal Encoding of Place Sequences by Hippocampal Cell Assemblies. Neuron 50, 145–157 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.023
Sauseng, P. et al. Relevance of EEG alpha and theta oscillations during task switching. Exp. Brain Res. 170, 295–301 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0211-y
van Driel, J., Sligte, I. G., Linders, J., Elport, D. & Cohen, M. X. Frequency Band-Specific Electrical Brain Stimulation Modulates Cognitive Control Processes. PLoS One 10, e0138984 (2015).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138984
pubmed: 4583279
pmcid: 4583279
van de Vijver, I., Ridderinkhof, K. R. & Cohen, M. X. Frontal Oscillatory Dynamics Predict Feedback Learning and Action Adjustment. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 4106–4121 (2011).
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00110
Fleming, S. M. Changing our minds about changes of mind. Elife 5, 3–5 (2016).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.14790
Holroyd, C. B. & Coles, M. G. H. The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 109, 679–709 (2002).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679
Cleeremans, A. The Radical Plasticity Thesis: How the Brain Learns to be Conscious. Front. Psychol. 2, 86 (2011).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00086
pubmed: 3110382
pmcid: 3110382
Cleeremans, A., Timmermans, B. & Pasquali, A. Consciousness and metarepresentation: a computational sketch. Neural Netw. 20, 1032–9 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.09.011
Buzsaki, G., Peyrache, A. & Kubie, J. Emergence of Cognition from Action. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. (2014).
Buzsaki, G. The Brain from Inside Out. (Oxford University Press, USA., 2019).
Benwell, C. S. Y., Beyer, R., Wallington, F. & Ince, R. A. A. History biases reveal novel dissociations between perceptual and metacognitive decision-making. bioRxiv Prepr (2019).
Rouault, M., Dayan, P. & Fleming, S. M. Forming global estimates of self-performance from local confidence. Nat. Commun. 1–11 (2019).
Wilson, R. C., Takahashi, Y. K., Schoenbaum, G. & Niv, Y. Orbitofrontal cortex as a cognitive map of task space. Neuron 81, 267–279 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.005
pubmed: 4001869
pmcid: 4001869
Schuck, N. W., Wilson, R. & Niv, Y. In Goal-Directed Decision Making 259–278 (Elsevier Inc., 2018).
Schuck, N. W., Cai, M. B., Wilson, R. C., Niv, Y. & Road, W. Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space. Neuron 91, 1402–1412 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.019
pubmed: 5044873
pmcid: 5044873
Wokke, M. E., Knot, S. L., Fouad, A. & Richard Ridderinkhof, K. Conflict in the kitchen: Contextual modulation of responsiveness to affordances. Conscious. Cogn. 40, 141–146 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.007
Wokke, M. E. & Ro, T. Competitive Frontoparietal Interactions Mediate Implicit Inferences. SO – J. Neurosci. 2019 Jun 26;39(26):5183–5194. J. Neurosci (2019).
Maniscalco, B. & Lau, H. A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 422–30 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.021
Vigário, R. N. Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 103, 395–404 (1997).
doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00042-8
Mitra, P. P. & Pesaran, B. Analysis of Dynamic Brain Imaging Data. Biophys. J. 76, 691–708 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77236-X
pubmed: 1300074
pmcid: 1300074
Cohen, M. X. Comparison of different spatial transformations applied to EEG data: A case study of error processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. (2015).
Cohen, M. X. Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice. MIT Press (2014).
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E. & Schoffelen, J.-M. FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 1–9 (2011).
doi: 10.1155/2011/156869