Imaging checklist for preoperative evaluation of laryngeal tumors to be treated by transoral microsurgery: guidelines from the European Laryngological Society.
Checklist
Imaging
Larynx
Surgery
Transoral
Tumors
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
23
12
2019
accepted:
16
02
2020
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
29
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The modern availability in daily practice of different DICOM viewers allows physicians to routinely evaluate computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scans of patients in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative settings. Their systematic use, together with a close surgeon-radiologist cooperation, may greatly improve outcomes of patients to be treated by transoral microsurgery for laryngeal cancer. We herein propose guidelines for systematic evaluation of CT/MR images taken from patients affected by supraglottic and glottic cancer to be treated by transoral microsurgery. A methodical, step-by-step approach focused on laryngeal anatomy, systematically looking at each true and false vocal folds, anterior commissure, laryngeal ventricle, subglottic area, epiglottis, thyroid, cricoid, and arytenoid cartilages, posterior commissure, crico-arytenoid unit, paraglottic and pre-epiglottic spaces, and possible extra-laryngeal extension is proposed. This checklist may be useful before imaging performance (to focus on specific issues to be detailed by the radiologist), as well before and during surgery for the specific evaluation of details to be cleared during transoral microsurgery. Detailed preoperative evaluation of supraglottic and glottic anatomy is essential prior to any transoral approach for neoplastic disease. The proposed imaging checklist described herein represents a step-by-step guide to surgeons performing this kind of interventions and an aid in achieving a meticulous approach from a surgical perspective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32107616
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05869-0
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-05869-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1707-1714Références
Agnello F, Cupido F, Sparacia G, Midiri F, Miroddi M, Grassedonio E et al (2017) Computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a practical approach. Neuroradiol J 30:197–204
doi: 10.1177/1971400916689373
Becker SS (2010) Preoperative computed tomography evaluation in sinus surgery: a template-driven approach. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 43:731–751
doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2010.04.020
Peretti G, Piazza C, Mora F, Garofolo S, Guastini L (2016) Reasonable limits for transoral laser microsurgery in laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 24:135–139
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000240
Succo G, Peretti G, Piazza C, Remacle M, Eckel HE, Chevalier D et al (2014) Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: a proposal for classification by the working committee on nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2489–2496
doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3024-4
Succo G, Crosetti E, Bertolin A, Piazza C, Molteni G, Cirillo S et al (2018) Treatment for T3 to T4a laryngeal cancer by open partial horizontal laryngectomies: Prognostic impact of different pathologic tumor subcategories. Head Neck 40:1897–1908
doi: 10.1002/hed.25176
Bon F, Piazza C, Lancini D, Paderno A, Bosio P, Taboni S et al (2019) Open partial horizontal laryngectomies for T3–T4 laryngeal cancer: prognostic impact of anterior vs posterior laryngeal compartmentalization. Cancers (Basel). 11.pii:E289
doi: 10.3390/cancers11030289
Remacle M, Arens C, Eldin MB, Campos G, Estomba CC, Dulguerov P et al (2017) Laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract: a clarification of nomenclature. A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:3723–3727
doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4708-3
Basterra J, Frias S, Alba JR, Zapater E (2006) A new device for treating laryngeal carcinoma using microdissection electrodes. Laryngoscope 116:2232–2234
doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000246184.55876.11
Remacle M, Prasad VMN (2018) Preliminary experience in transoral laryngeal surgery with a flexible robotic system for benign lesions of the vocal folds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275:761–765
doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4900-0
Remacle M, Eckel HE, Antonelli A, Brasnu D, Chevalier D, Friedrich G et al (2000) Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:227–231
doi: 10.1007/s004050050228
Remacle M, Van Haverbeke C, Eckel H, Bradley P, Chevalier D, Djukic V et al (2007) Proposal for revision of the European Laryngological Society classification of endoscopic cordectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:499–504
doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0279-z
Remacle M, Hantzakos A, Eckel H, Evrard AS, Bradley PJ, Chevalier D et al (2009) Endoscopic supraglottic laryngectomy: a proposal for a classification by the working committee on nomenclature, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:993–998
doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0901-8
Piazza C, Del Bon F, Peretti G, Nicolai P (2011) “Biologic endoscopy”: optimization of upper aerodigestive tract cancer evaluation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19:67–76
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328344b3ed