A randomized controlled study incorporating an electromechanical gait machine, the Hybrid Assistive Limb, in gait training of patients with severe limitations in walking in the subacute phase after stroke.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
05
06
2019
accepted:
11
02
2020
entrez:
29
2
2020
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
12
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early onset, intensive and repetitive, gait training may improve outcome after stroke but for patients with severe limitations in walking, rehabilitation is a challenge. The Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) is a gait machine that captures voluntary actions and support gait motions. Previous studies of HAL indicate beneficial effects on walking, but these results need to be confirmed in blinded, randomized controlled studies. This study aimed to explore effects of incorporating gait training with HAL as part of an inpatient rehabilitation program after stroke. Thirty-two subacute stroke patients with severe limitations in walking were randomized to incorporated HAL training (4 days/week for 4 weeks) or conventional gait training only. Blinded assessments were carried out at baseline, after the intervention, and at 6 months post stroke. The primary outcome was walking independence according to the Functional Ambulation Categories. Secondary outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, 2-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, and the Barthel Index. No significant between-group differences were found regarding any primary or secondary outcomes. At 6 months, two thirds of all patients were independent in walking. Prediction of independent walking at 6 months was not influenced by treatment group, but by age (OR 0.848, CI 0.719-0.998, p = 0.048). This study found no difference between groups for any outcomes despite the extra resources required for the HAL training, but highlights the substantial improvements in walking seen when evidence-based rehabilitation is provided to patients, with severe limitations in walking in the subacute stage after stroke. In future studies potential subgroups of patients who will benefit the most from electromechanically-assisted gait training should be explored.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32109255
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229707
pii: PONE-D-19-15743
pmc: PMC7048283
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0229707Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
HAL suits were provided by Cyberdyne Inc. Japan and therefore Yoshiyuki Sankai and Hiroaki Kawamoto are listed as Investigators in the Study protocol (Supporting Information, S2). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Dec;54(6):819-826
pubmed: 29600688
Stroke. 2017 Apr;48(4):1011-1019
pubmed: 28280137
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(1):87-97
pubmed: 27814305
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015 Nov;23(6):1128
pubmed: 26560084
Stroke. 2009 Oct;40(10):3396-9
pubmed: 19661471
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 May;26(4):318-24
pubmed: 22086903
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jun 02;11:92
pubmed: 24890413
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
pubmed: 1135616
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2053-8
pubmed: 24867924
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):313-9
pubmed: 19118128
Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1693-702
pubmed: 21571152
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Jan;76(1):27-32
pubmed: 7811170
Stroke. 2015 Jun;46(6):1508-12
pubmed: 25899242
Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40
pubmed: 6691052
J Rehabil Med. 2014 May;46(5):387-99
pubmed: 24733289
Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2):349-54
pubmed: 17204680
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5078
pubmed: 27741123
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Mar;39(1):29-35
pubmed: 26512928
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Mar;10(2):141-8
pubmed: 24611590
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Oct-Nov;31(10-11):955-964
pubmed: 29090654
Stroke. 1994 Nov;25(11):2220-6
pubmed: 7974549
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(2):293-299
pubmed: 29526861
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:462-6
pubmed: 21095652
Stroke. 2011 Nov;42(11):3311-5
pubmed: 21998062
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):613-22
pubmed: 22773263
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Oct;26(8):923-31
pubmed: 22466792
J Physiother. 2013 Sep;59(3):189-97
pubmed: 23896334
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Nov;95(11):2006-12
pubmed: 25010538
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 10;5:CD006185
pubmed: 28488268
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;42(1):103-7
pubmed: 15742254
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2011 Summer;17(1):42-49
pubmed: 21857778
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281-99
pubmed: 15502272
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(3):363-367
pubmed: 28222558
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Sep 07;9:65
pubmed: 22953989
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Mar 25;9:48
pubmed: 25859191
Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Dec;29(6):677-683
pubmed: 27748688
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Aug;8(8):741-54
pubmed: 19608100
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(7):551-9
pubmed: 20136473
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct;88(10):1314-9
pubmed: 17908575
Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):982-9
pubmed: 7762050
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(3):268-74
pubmed: 21186329
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(6):487-92
pubmed: 26041627
Stroke. 2005 Dec;36(12):2676-80
pubmed: 16282540
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Nov;73(11):1073-80
pubmed: 1444775
J Neurol Sci. 2015;353(1-2):130-6
pubmed: 25956233
Curr Opin Neurol. 2009 Dec;22(6):563-9
pubmed: 19724226
PM R. 2009 Jun;1(6):516-23
pubmed: 19627940
J Physiother. 2016 Oct;62(4):182-7
pubmed: 27637769
Curr Opin Neurol. 2013 Feb;26(1):37-42
pubmed: 23254556
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jun;30(5):440-50
pubmed: 26338433