Decision Making in Retroperitoneal Nerve Sheath and Nerve-Associated Tumors: A Modular Approach.
Decision making
Retroperitoneal nerve tumor
Surgical access routes
Journal
Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
received:
10
04
2019
accepted:
15
12
2019
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
26
1
2021
entrez:
29
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical treatment of retroperitoneal nerve and nerve-associated tumors is challenging, especially in cases with large extent. A single surgical access may have limitations and jeopardize patients. To present a series of patients to illustrate our individually tailored treatment concept and decision pathway. Retrospectively, clinical findings and imaging were related to surgical features and outcome. An algorithm for choice of approach was established. From 2012 to 2017, we operated on n = 13 patients with retroperitoneal tumors, of these n = 9 were included (n = 6 female, n = 3 male). Histological findings included n = 2 schwannomas, n = 2 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, n = 1 non-origin sarcoma, n = 1 perineurioma, n = 1 intraneural ganglion cyst, n = 1 lymphoma, and n = 1 paraganglioma. In n = 6 patients, we used a monoportal (retroperitoneal/transperitoneal) approach; in n = 2 patients, a biportal retroperitoneal to inguinal/transperitoneal to dorsal approach; and in n = 1 patient, a triportal transperitoneal to dorsal to gluteal approach. In n = 2 patients, we performed an open biopsy only; in n = 2 patients, a tumor enucleation; in n = 3 patients, a subtotal function-sparing resection; in n = 1 patient, a complete resection; and in n = 1 patient, intraneural decompression. In n = 1 patient, a new motor deficit appeared. n = 4 patients required further radio-oncological treatment. n = 8/9 patients are alive without tumor progress or recurrence. Retroperitoneal nerve or nerve-associated tumors encompass multiple entities. Depending on suspected histology and tumor extension, extensile or combined surgical approaches may be necessary. We present our algorithm for assessment and decision-making regarding surgical access ports and pathways.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Surgical treatment of retroperitoneal nerve and nerve-associated tumors is challenging, especially in cases with large extent. A single surgical access may have limitations and jeopardize patients.
OBJECTIVE
To present a series of patients to illustrate our individually tailored treatment concept and decision pathway.
METHODS
Retrospectively, clinical findings and imaging were related to surgical features and outcome. An algorithm for choice of approach was established.
RESULTS
From 2012 to 2017, we operated on n = 13 patients with retroperitoneal tumors, of these n = 9 were included (n = 6 female, n = 3 male). Histological findings included n = 2 schwannomas, n = 2 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, n = 1 non-origin sarcoma, n = 1 perineurioma, n = 1 intraneural ganglion cyst, n = 1 lymphoma, and n = 1 paraganglioma. In n = 6 patients, we used a monoportal (retroperitoneal/transperitoneal) approach; in n = 2 patients, a biportal retroperitoneal to inguinal/transperitoneal to dorsal approach; and in n = 1 patient, a triportal transperitoneal to dorsal to gluteal approach. In n = 2 patients, we performed an open biopsy only; in n = 2 patients, a tumor enucleation; in n = 3 patients, a subtotal function-sparing resection; in n = 1 patient, a complete resection; and in n = 1 patient, intraneural decompression. In n = 1 patient, a new motor deficit appeared. n = 4 patients required further radio-oncological treatment. n = 8/9 patients are alive without tumor progress or recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Retroperitoneal nerve or nerve-associated tumors encompass multiple entities. Depending on suspected histology and tumor extension, extensile or combined surgical approaches may be necessary. We present our algorithm for assessment and decision-making regarding surgical access ports and pathways.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32109286
pii: 5766362
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa020
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E359-E369Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.