Decision Making in Retroperitoneal Nerve Sheath and Nerve-Associated Tumors: A Modular Approach.


Journal

Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2020
Historique:
received: 10 04 2019
accepted: 15 12 2019
pubmed: 29 2 2020
medline: 26 1 2021
entrez: 29 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surgical treatment of retroperitoneal nerve and nerve-associated tumors is challenging, especially in cases with large extent. A single surgical access may have limitations and jeopardize patients. To present a series of patients to illustrate our individually tailored treatment concept and decision pathway. Retrospectively, clinical findings and imaging were related to surgical features and outcome. An algorithm for choice of approach was established. From 2012 to 2017, we operated on n = 13 patients with retroperitoneal tumors, of these n = 9 were included (n = 6 female, n = 3 male). Histological findings included n = 2 schwannomas, n = 2 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, n = 1 non-origin sarcoma, n = 1 perineurioma, n = 1 intraneural ganglion cyst, n = 1 lymphoma, and n = 1 paraganglioma. In n = 6 patients, we used a monoportal (retroperitoneal/transperitoneal) approach; in n = 2 patients, a biportal retroperitoneal to inguinal/transperitoneal to dorsal approach; and in n = 1 patient, a triportal transperitoneal to dorsal to gluteal approach. In n = 2 patients, we performed an open biopsy only; in n = 2 patients, a tumor enucleation; in n = 3 patients, a subtotal function-sparing resection; in n = 1 patient, a complete resection; and in n = 1 patient, intraneural decompression. In n = 1 patient, a new motor deficit appeared. n = 4 patients required further radio-oncological treatment. n = 8/9 patients are alive without tumor progress or recurrence. Retroperitoneal nerve or nerve-associated tumors encompass multiple entities. Depending on suspected histology and tumor extension, extensile or combined surgical approaches may be necessary. We present our algorithm for assessment and decision-making regarding surgical access ports and pathways.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Surgical treatment of retroperitoneal nerve and nerve-associated tumors is challenging, especially in cases with large extent. A single surgical access may have limitations and jeopardize patients.
OBJECTIVE
To present a series of patients to illustrate our individually tailored treatment concept and decision pathway.
METHODS
Retrospectively, clinical findings and imaging were related to surgical features and outcome. An algorithm for choice of approach was established.
RESULTS
From 2012 to 2017, we operated on n = 13 patients with retroperitoneal tumors, of these n = 9 were included (n = 6 female, n = 3 male). Histological findings included n = 2 schwannomas, n = 2 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, n = 1 non-origin sarcoma, n = 1 perineurioma, n = 1 intraneural ganglion cyst, n = 1 lymphoma, and n = 1 paraganglioma. In n = 6 patients, we used a monoportal (retroperitoneal/transperitoneal) approach; in n = 2 patients, a biportal retroperitoneal to inguinal/transperitoneal to dorsal approach; and in n = 1 patient, a triportal transperitoneal to dorsal to gluteal approach. In n = 2 patients, we performed an open biopsy only; in n = 2 patients, a tumor enucleation; in n = 3 patients, a subtotal function-sparing resection; in n = 1 patient, a complete resection; and in n = 1 patient, intraneural decompression. In n = 1 patient, a new motor deficit appeared. n = 4 patients required further radio-oncological treatment. n = 8/9 patients are alive without tumor progress or recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Retroperitoneal nerve or nerve-associated tumors encompass multiple entities. Depending on suspected histology and tumor extension, extensile or combined surgical approaches may be necessary. We present our algorithm for assessment and decision-making regarding surgical access ports and pathways.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32109286
pii: 5766362
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa020
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

E359-E369

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Auteurs

Christian Heinen (C)

Department of Neurosurgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Thomas Schmidt (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Thomas Kretschmer (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Klagenfurt, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH