Evaluation of adverse drug reaction profile of antiepileptic drugs in persons with epilepsy: A cross-sectional study.


Journal

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
ISSN: 1525-5069
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892858

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 18 12 2019
revised: 12 01 2020
accepted: 24 01 2020
pubmed: 29 2 2020
medline: 30 12 2020
entrez: 29 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are preferred over conventional AEDs with the perception of better safety profile and efficacy though there is a lack of confirmatory evidence. The present study assessed the adverse drug reactions' (ADRs) profile of AEDs prescribed in persons with epilepsy (PWE) as per the System Organ Class (SOC) and compared them on the basis of demographics and treatment pattern. This prospective, cross-sectional, and observational study was conducted in PWE attending Neurology Outpatient-Department from February 2016 to April 2019 who were presented with any ADR. World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale was used for the causality assessment of suspected ADRs. Among the 1011 PWE on AEDs, male:female ratio was 622:389, adult:pediatric ratio 736:275, and conventional:newer AEDs ratio 624:387. Among monotherapy PWE (47.1%), commonly used AEDs were levetiracetam (34.4%), valproic acid (22.9%), carbamazepine (18.3%), phenytoin (11.9%), and other AEDs (12.5%). A total of 1990 ADRs (1.96 ADRs per PWE) were reported as per SOC; among them, newer vs. conventional AEDs did not reveal any significant difference; however, monotherapy vs. polytherapy showed differences in nervous system disorders (p = 0.01) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (p = 0.005). Causality assessment revealed 0.3% certain, 27.3% probable, 61.3% possible, and 11.1% unlikely association of ADRs with AEDs. Depending on the ADRs, there was either withdrawal of AED (0.9%), reduction in dose (48.4%), or continuation in the same dose as before (50.7%). The ADR analysis showed that newer AEDs were associated with a similar trend of ADRs as that of conventional AEDs. Thus, the choice among newer and conventional AEDs should preferably focus on the experience of better efficacy in addition to safety data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32109858
pii: S1525-5050(19)31381-2
doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.106947
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anticonvulsants 0
Benzodiazepines 12794-10-4
Levetiracetam 44YRR34555
Valproic Acid 614OI1Z5WI

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106947

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Sachin Kumar (S)

Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Sudhir Chandra Sarangi (SC)

Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: scsarangi@gmail.com.

Manjari Tripathi (M)

Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Yogendra Kumar Gupta (YK)

Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH