Evaluation of adverse drug reaction profile of antiepileptic drugs in persons with epilepsy: A cross-sectional study.
Adolescent
Adult
Anticonvulsants
/ adverse effects
Benzodiazepines
/ therapeutic use
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
/ diagnosis
Epilepsy
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Levetiracetam
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Valproic Acid
/ adverse effects
Young Adult
Adverse drug reaction
Antiepileptic drugs
Causality assessment
Persons with epilepsy
System Organ Class
Journal
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
ISSN: 1525-5069
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
18
12
2019
revised:
12
01
2020
accepted:
24
01
2020
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
30
12
2020
entrez:
29
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are preferred over conventional AEDs with the perception of better safety profile and efficacy though there is a lack of confirmatory evidence. The present study assessed the adverse drug reactions' (ADRs) profile of AEDs prescribed in persons with epilepsy (PWE) as per the System Organ Class (SOC) and compared them on the basis of demographics and treatment pattern. This prospective, cross-sectional, and observational study was conducted in PWE attending Neurology Outpatient-Department from February 2016 to April 2019 who were presented with any ADR. World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale was used for the causality assessment of suspected ADRs. Among the 1011 PWE on AEDs, male:female ratio was 622:389, adult:pediatric ratio 736:275, and conventional:newer AEDs ratio 624:387. Among monotherapy PWE (47.1%), commonly used AEDs were levetiracetam (34.4%), valproic acid (22.9%), carbamazepine (18.3%), phenytoin (11.9%), and other AEDs (12.5%). A total of 1990 ADRs (1.96 ADRs per PWE) were reported as per SOC; among them, newer vs. conventional AEDs did not reveal any significant difference; however, monotherapy vs. polytherapy showed differences in nervous system disorders (p = 0.01) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (p = 0.005). Causality assessment revealed 0.3% certain, 27.3% probable, 61.3% possible, and 11.1% unlikely association of ADRs with AEDs. Depending on the ADRs, there was either withdrawal of AED (0.9%), reduction in dose (48.4%), or continuation in the same dose as before (50.7%). The ADR analysis showed that newer AEDs were associated with a similar trend of ADRs as that of conventional AEDs. Thus, the choice among newer and conventional AEDs should preferably focus on the experience of better efficacy in addition to safety data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32109858
pii: S1525-5050(19)31381-2
doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.106947
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticonvulsants
0
Benzodiazepines
12794-10-4
Levetiracetam
44YRR34555
Valproic Acid
614OI1Z5WI
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106947Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose.