'All these things don't take the pain away but they do help you to accept it': making the case for compassion-focused therapy in the management of persistent pain.
Compassion-focused therapy
acceptance
chronic pain
compassion
connection
feasibility
interpretative phenomenological analysis
persistent pain
Journal
British journal of pain
ISSN: 2049-4637
Titre abrégé: Br J Pain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101583844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez:
29
2
2020
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
29
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
People with persistent pain are frequently offered a pain management programme (PMP) as part of their care plan. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) principles often underpin PMPs and has a good evidence base; nevertheless, more recent systematic reviews have suggested that its effectiveness is limited. Compassion-focused therapy (CFT) is a form of 'third-wave CBT' that offers an alternative and complementary view of pain, encouraging the person to be alongside their experience of pain and respond to it using skills of compassion they have learnt. The current research explored the effectiveness of a 12-week CFT group for people who experience persistent pain. Research interviews explored CFT members' experiences of the CFT group. Feedback was collected on the facilitators' experience of running the group and questionnaire data collected on participants' mood, pain disability, acceptance of chronic pain and levels of self-criticism and self-reassurance. Interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis that revealed five master superordinate themes representative across all interviews. These were then triangulated with data from the questionnaires and facilitator feedback. In people whose persistent pain was compounded by a significant psychological component, a CFT group approach helped reduce feelings of isolation, improve ability to self-reassure, learn new ways of coping and develop a growing acceptance of the limitations associated with their pain. The possible implications for future clinical practice are considered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
People with persistent pain are frequently offered a pain management programme (PMP) as part of their care plan. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) principles often underpin PMPs and has a good evidence base; nevertheless, more recent systematic reviews have suggested that its effectiveness is limited. Compassion-focused therapy (CFT) is a form of 'third-wave CBT' that offers an alternative and complementary view of pain, encouraging the person to be alongside their experience of pain and respond to it using skills of compassion they have learnt.
METHOD
METHODS
The current research explored the effectiveness of a 12-week CFT group for people who experience persistent pain. Research interviews explored CFT members' experiences of the CFT group. Feedback was collected on the facilitators' experience of running the group and questionnaire data collected on participants' mood, pain disability, acceptance of chronic pain and levels of self-criticism and self-reassurance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis that revealed five master superordinate themes representative across all interviews. These were then triangulated with data from the questionnaires and facilitator feedback.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In people whose persistent pain was compounded by a significant psychological component, a CFT group approach helped reduce feelings of isolation, improve ability to self-reassure, learn new ways of coping and develop a growing acceptance of the limitations associated with their pain. The possible implications for future clinical practice are considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32110396
doi: 10.1177/2049463719857099
pii: 10.1177_2049463719857099
pmc: PMC7026828
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
31-41Informations de copyright
© The British Pain Society 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Pers Assess. 2007 Dec;89(3):230-46
pubmed: 18001224
Pain. 2016 Dec;157(12):2625-2627
pubmed: 27257856
Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):533-542
pubmed: 21251756
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):495-507
pubmed: 23893917
J Pain. 2015 Sep;16(9):807-13
pubmed: 26051220
Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Mar;43(Pt 1):31-50
pubmed: 15005905
J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1133-59
pubmed: 15509279
Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;43(3):423-61
pubmed: 26301761
Psychother Res. 2010 Mar;20(2):123-35
pubmed: 20099202
Pain. 1990 Feb;40(2):171-182
pubmed: 2308763
J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Jan;17(1):83-93
pubmed: 21265650
Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;90(3):432-455
pubmed: 27664071
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Sep;67(9):942-68
pubmed: 21647882
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD007407
pubmed: 23152245
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Oct;73(1):114-20
pubmed: 18640807
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Apr;43(4):759-70
pubmed: 22071165
Pain. 2008 Nov 30;140(2):284-291
pubmed: 18824301
J Pain. 2014 May;15(5):550.e1-10
pubmed: 24548852
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Mar;53(1):78-94
pubmed: 24588763
Psychol Psychother. 2013 Dec;86(4):387-400
pubmed: 24217864
Psychol Med. 2015 Apr;45(5):927-45
pubmed: 25215860