International Microsurgery Club: An Effective Online Collaboration System.
Journal
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
ISSN: 1098-8947
Titre abrégé: J Reconstr Microsurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8502670
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
29
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to determine if International Microsurgery Club (IMC) is an effective online resource for microsurgeons worldwide, in providing an avenue for timely group discussions and advice regarding complicated cases, and an avenue for collaboration and information sharing. All posts on the IMC Facebook group from member 1 to 8,000 were analyzed according to inclusion criteria and categorized into three categories-case discussion, question, and information sharing. Posts were retrospectively analyzed for number of responses, time of responses, number of "likes," number of treatment options, time of day, and demographics of authors and responders. A retrospective analysis of 531 cases showed an average response rate of 75.7% within 1 hour and as membership grew. The response rate stabilized averaging between 72.5 and 78% across all times of the day. An average of 11.8 microsurgeons was involved per case discussion, and 5.7 treatment options were provided per case. IMC is shown to be an effective resource to allow microsurgeons to access timely advice from other microsurgeons without time and distance limitation, and to have interactive group discussions on complicated cases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to determine if International Microsurgery Club (IMC) is an effective online resource for microsurgeons worldwide, in providing an avenue for timely group discussions and advice regarding complicated cases, and an avenue for collaboration and information sharing.
METHODS
METHODS
All posts on the IMC Facebook group from member 1 to 8,000 were analyzed according to inclusion criteria and categorized into three categories-case discussion, question, and information sharing. Posts were retrospectively analyzed for number of responses, time of responses, number of "likes," number of treatment options, time of day, and demographics of authors and responders.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A retrospective analysis of 531 cases showed an average response rate of 75.7% within 1 hour and as membership grew. The response rate stabilized averaging between 72.5 and 78% across all times of the day. An average of 11.8 microsurgeons was involved per case discussion, and 5.7 treatment options were provided per case.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
IMC is shown to be an effective resource to allow microsurgeons to access timely advice from other microsurgeons without time and distance limitation, and to have interactive group discussions on complicated cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32110823
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702158
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
412-419Informations de copyright
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.