The Efficiency of Live-Capture Traps for the Study of Red Fox (

trap rate trapping methodology trapping success weather wild canids

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 21 01 2020
revised: 20 02 2020
accepted: 24 02 2020
entrez: 1 3 2020
pubmed: 1 3 2020
medline: 1 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Safe and efficient techniques for the live capture of carnivores are limited. In this study, we identified some of the factors that could affect the success of capturing red fox cubs with live capture traps (also known as cage traps). During a three-year period, we analysed 32 captures of 25 fox cubs (1.3 captures/fox). We assessed the impact of the following factors: sex of animals, month of trapping, weather conditions recorded for each trap-night, the willingness of cubs to explore and enter cage traps, the researchers' activity around den complexes before trapping and distances to the nearest village or farm. The overall trap rate (32 captures, including recaptured cubs) and the trap rate for individual cubs (25 captures) was 11.2 cubs/100 trap-nights and 8.7/100 trap-nights, respectively. Animals other than foxes were captured only three times, thus the selectivity of the cage-trapping method was high (32/35 = 91.4%). The probability of capturing one cub per night was 70.2% (32 cubs/ 47 nights). Cubs inhabiting dens in the vicinity of human settlements were less likely to explore and enter traps. Vixens were more likely to relocate their litters if the activity of the staff setting the traps was intense at the trapping site. The success of trapping was higher during poor weather as, for example, during rain or thunderstorms. None of the trapped animals suffered any injuries. Whereas cage trapping can be an effective and safe capture method for juvenile foxes, capture efficiency is affected by the experience of the trappers and a range of other factors including weather and distance to human settlements.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32110960
pii: ani10030374
doi: 10.3390/ani10030374
pmc: PMC7143229
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Narodowe Centrum Nauki
ID : 2014/14/E/NZ7/00153

Références

Parasitology. 2008 Jul;135(8):985-97
pubmed: 18598578
Parasitology. 2015 Dec;142(14):1722-43
pubmed: 26442655
J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688
pubmed: 29692469

Auteurs

Ewa J Mierzejewska (EJ)

Department of Eco-Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Institute of Developmental Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.

Dorota Dwużnik (D)

Department of Eco-Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Institute of Developmental Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.

Katarzyna Tołkacz (K)

Department of Eco-Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Institute of Developmental Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.

Anna Bajer (A)

Department of Eco-Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Institute of Developmental Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.

Marek Panek (M)

Polish Hunting Association, Research Station, Sokolnicza 12, Czempiń, Poland.

Maciej Grzybek (M)

Department of Tropical Parasitology, Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.

Classifications MeSH