Three-dimensional surface imaging in breast cancer: a new tool for clinical studies?

Breast cancer Breast imaging Breast-conserving therapy Clinical studies Outcome Radiation therapy Skin Three-dimensional surface imaging Toxicity Volume measurements

Journal

Radiation oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 1748-717X
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265111

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 20 12 2019
accepted: 18 02 2020
entrez: 1 3 2020
pubmed: 1 3 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Three-dimensional Surface Imaging (3DSI) is a well-established method to objectively monitor morphological changes in the female breast in the field of plastic surgery. In contrast, in radiation oncology we are still missing effective tools, which can objectively and reproducibly assess and document adverse events in breast cancer radiotherapy within the framework of clinical studies. The aim of the present study was to apply structured-light technology as a non-invasive and objective approach for the documentation of cosmetic outcome and early effects of breast radiotherapy as a proof of principle. Weekly 3DSI images of patients receiving either conventionally fractionated radiation treatment (CF-RT) or hypofractionated radiation treatment (HF-RT) were acquired during the radiotherapy treatment and clinical follow-up. The portable Artec Eva scanner (Artec 3D Inc., Luxembourg) recorded 3D surface images for the analysis of breast volumes and changes in skin appearance. Statistical analysis compared the impact of the two different fractionation regimens and the differences between the treated and the contralateral healthy breast. Overall, 38 patients and a total of 214 breast imaging sessions were analysed. Patients receiving CF-RT showed a significantly higher frequency of breast erythema compared to HF-RT (93.3% versus 34.8%, p = 0.003) during all observed imaging sessions. Moreover, we found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) volumetric increase of the treated breast of the entire cohort between baseline (379 ± 196 mL) and follow-up imaging at 3 months (437 ± 224 mL), as well as from week 3 of radiotherapy (391 ± 198 mL) to follow-up imaging. In both subgroups of patients undergoing either CF-RT or HF-RT, there was a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) in breast volumes between baseline and 3 months follow-up. There were no statistically significant skin or volumetric changes of the untreated healthy breasts. This is the first study utilizing 3D structured-light technology as a non-invasive and objective approach for the documentation of patients receiving breast radiotherapy. 3DSI offers potential as a non-invasive tool to objectively and precisely monitor the female breast in a radiooncological setting, allowing clinicians to objectively distinguish outcomes of different therapy modalities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Three-dimensional Surface Imaging (3DSI) is a well-established method to objectively monitor morphological changes in the female breast in the field of plastic surgery. In contrast, in radiation oncology we are still missing effective tools, which can objectively and reproducibly assess and document adverse events in breast cancer radiotherapy within the framework of clinical studies. The aim of the present study was to apply structured-light technology as a non-invasive and objective approach for the documentation of cosmetic outcome and early effects of breast radiotherapy as a proof of principle.
METHODS METHODS
Weekly 3DSI images of patients receiving either conventionally fractionated radiation treatment (CF-RT) or hypofractionated radiation treatment (HF-RT) were acquired during the radiotherapy treatment and clinical follow-up. The portable Artec Eva scanner (Artec 3D Inc., Luxembourg) recorded 3D surface images for the analysis of breast volumes and changes in skin appearance. Statistical analysis compared the impact of the two different fractionation regimens and the differences between the treated and the contralateral healthy breast.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 38 patients and a total of 214 breast imaging sessions were analysed. Patients receiving CF-RT showed a significantly higher frequency of breast erythema compared to HF-RT (93.3% versus 34.8%, p = 0.003) during all observed imaging sessions. Moreover, we found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) volumetric increase of the treated breast of the entire cohort between baseline (379 ± 196 mL) and follow-up imaging at 3 months (437 ± 224 mL), as well as from week 3 of radiotherapy (391 ± 198 mL) to follow-up imaging. In both subgroups of patients undergoing either CF-RT or HF-RT, there was a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) in breast volumes between baseline and 3 months follow-up. There were no statistically significant skin or volumetric changes of the untreated healthy breasts.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study utilizing 3D structured-light technology as a non-invasive and objective approach for the documentation of patients receiving breast radiotherapy. 3DSI offers potential as a non-invasive tool to objectively and precisely monitor the female breast in a radiooncological setting, allowing clinicians to objectively distinguish outcomes of different therapy modalities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32111228
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01499-2
pii: 10.1186/s13014-020-01499-2
pmc: PMC7049187
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

52

Références

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jun;143(6):1605-1613
pubmed: 30907804
Breast. 2016 Aug;28:121-9
pubmed: 27288864
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;42(1):49-58
pubmed: 28916881
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 31;:JCO1800317
pubmed: 30379626
Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1098-107
pubmed: 18355913
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):513-20
pubmed: 20147717
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Mar 14;39(4):NP36-NP44
pubmed: 30239592
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818806002
pubmed: 30453842
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):93-100
pubmed: 21752481
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1086-1094
pubmed: 24055415
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Mar;11(3):231-40
pubmed: 20138809
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):114-8
pubmed: 27046390
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr 19;13(1):72
pubmed: 29673384
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):1-6
pubmed: 30276455
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0218018
pubmed: 31181091
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Feb;71(2):162-170
pubmed: 29233508
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):489-97
pubmed: 24529695
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Jan;114(1):3-10
pubmed: 25630428
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Oct 26;11(1):143
pubmed: 27784326
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul 11;14(1):125
pubmed: 31296245
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jan;73(1):141-148
pubmed: 31519501
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 7;13(1):218
pubmed: 30404664
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct 14;14(1):175
pubmed: 31610801
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul 16;13(1):128
pubmed: 30012156
Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;32(1):88-94
pubmed: 26862969
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Dec 28;7(4):e4
pubmed: 28154748
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jul;195(7):615-628
pubmed: 31101954
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184498
pubmed: 28886154
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;236:363-374
pubmed: 28508819
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Jan;114(1):28-34
pubmed: 25236715
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Jun;43(3):616-624
pubmed: 30815735
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 May;62(5):570-5
pubmed: 19387164
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 31;11(2):
pubmed: 30709048
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):612-20
pubmed: 18405826
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Jan;63:63-71
pubmed: 30467027

Auteurs

Konstantin Christoph Koban (KC)

Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany. konstantin.koban@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Lucas Etzel (L)

Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Zhouxiao Li (Z)

Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Montserrat Pazos (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Stephan Schönecker (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Claus Belka (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Riccardo Enzo Giunta (RE)

Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Thilo Ludwig Schenck (TL)

Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Stefanie Corradini (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH