Influence of Ranibizumab versus laser photocoagulation on radiation retinopathy (RadiRet) - a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Aged
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Laser Coagulation
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Radiation Injuries
/ complications
Ranibizumab
/ administration & dosage
Retina
/ pathology
Retinal Diseases
/ diagnosis
Single-Blind Method
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
Intravitreal therapy
Laser photocoagulation
Radiation retinopathy
Ranibizumab
Uveal melanoma
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
29
07
2019
accepted:
02
02
2020
revised:
23
01
2020
pubmed:
1
3
2020
medline:
4
2
2021
entrez:
1
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To demonstrate superiority of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg compared to focal and peripheral laser treatment in patients with radiation retinopathy for choroidal melanoma. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with radiation retinopathy and visual acuity impairment due to radiation maculopathy accessible for laser therapy, age ≥ 18 years, and BCVA less than 20/32. The main objective was to study the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 6 months from ranibizumab 0.5 mg (experimental) compared to focal laser of the macula and panretinal laser treatment of the ischemic retina (control) in patients with radiation retinopathy in choroidal melanoma. The secondary objectives of the radiation retinopathy study were to compare functional and anatomical results between ranibizumab and laser group over 12 months and to measure the frequency of vitreous hemorrhage and rubeosis iridis. The intention-to-treat analysis included 31 patients assigned to ranibizumab (n = 15) or laser treatment (n = 16). In terms of BCVA at month 6, ranibizumab was superior to laser treatment, with an advantage of 0.14 logMAR, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.25, p = 0.030. The positive effect of ranibizumab disappeared after treatment was discontinued. Similar results without statistically significant difference were found with respect to macular thickness. In both groups, no change was observed at month 6 in the size of ischemia in the macula or periphery compared to baseline. There was 1 case of vitreous hemorrhage in the laser group and no case of rubeosis iridis over time. This study showed a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity and clear superiority of ranibizumab compared to laser treatment up to 26 weeks, but this effect disappeared at week 52 after completion of intravitreal treatment. Ranibizumab and PRP are considered equivalent in terms of the non-appearance of proliferative radiation retinopathy during the study. EudraCT Number: 2011-004463-69.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32112140
doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04618-7
pii: 10.1007/s00417-020-04618-7
pmc: PMC7575494
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
869-878Références
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):60-6
pubmed: 26391167
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):228-34
pubmed: 23934823
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:31-39
pubmed: 27163234
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;92(8):e694-6
pubmed: 24739457
Retina. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(7):964-8
pubmed: 18698298
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;254(9):1787-92
pubmed: 27376824
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;37(7):654-9
pubmed: 19788660
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):269-275
pubmed: 24139123
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 May;117(5):609-14
pubmed: 10326957
Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1683-9
pubmed: 13129862
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 1;136(10):1138-1148
pubmed: 30043039
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2016 Aug;114:T2
pubmed: 27630373
Ophthalmology. 1987 Jul;94(7):761-74
pubmed: 3658348
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;178:94-100
pubmed: 28365241
Retina. 2017 May;37(5):886-895
pubmed: 27632713
Ophthalmology. 1992 Aug;99(8):1278-85
pubmed: 1325044