Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: How much do we gain?

camera trap data integration large carnivore multiple observation process noninvasive monitoring simulation spatial capture-recapture

Journal

Ecology
ISSN: 1939-9170
Titre abrégé: Ecology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0043541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 12 07 2019
revised: 27 12 2019
accepted: 29 01 2020
pubmed: 1 3 2020
medline: 22 1 2021
entrez: 1 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Population monitoring data may originate from multiple methods and are often sparse and fraught with incomplete information due to practical and economic constraints. Models that can integrate multiple survey methods and are able to cope with incomplete data may help investigators exploit available information more thoroughly. Here, we developed an integrated spatial capture-recapture (SCR) model to incorporate multiple data sources with imperfect individual identification. We contrast inferences drawn from this model with alternate models incorporating only subsets of the data available. Using extensive simulations and an empirical example of multi-method brown bear (Ursus arctos) monitoring data from northern Pakistan, we quantified the benefits of including multiple sources of information in SCR models in terms of parameter precision and bias. Our multiple observation processes SCR model (MOP) yielded a more complete picture of the underlying processes, reduced bias, and led to more precise parameter estimates. Our results suggest that the greatest gains from integrated SCR models can be expected in situations where detection probability is low, a large proportion of detections is not attributable to individuals, and the degree of overlap between individual home ranges is low.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32112415
doi: 10.1002/ecy.3030
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e03030

Subventions

Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 204202/F20
Pays : International
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 286886
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Ecological Society of America.

Références

Augustine, B. C., J. A. Royle, S. M. Murphy, R. B. Chandler, J. J. Cox, and M. J. Kelly. 2019. Spatial capture-recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture-recapture. Ecosphere 10:e02627.
Besbeas, P., S. N. Freeman, B. J. T. Morgan, and E. A. Catchpole. 2002. Integrating mark-recapture-recovery and census data to estimate animal abundance and demographic parameters. Biometrics 58:540-547.
Bischof, R., H. Brøseth, and O. Gimenez. 2016. Wildlife in a politically divided world: Insularism inflates estimates of brown bear abundance. Conservation Letters 9:122-130.
Blanc, L., E. Marboutin, S. Gatti, F. Zimmermann, O. Gimenez, and H. McCallum. 2014. Improving abundance estimation by combining capture-recapture and occupancy data: example with a large carnivore. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:1733-1739.
Borchers, D. L., and M. G. Efford. 2008. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377-385.
Borchers, D. L., and R. M. Fewster. 2016. Spatial capture-recapture models. Statistical Science 31:219-232.
Brooks, S. P., and A. Gelman. 1998. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7:434-455.
Burgar, J. M., F. E. C. Stewart, J. P. Volpe, J. T. Fisher, and A. C. Burton. 2018. Estimating density for species conservation: Comparing camera trap spatial count models to genetic spatial capture-recapture models. Global Ecology and Conservation 15:e00411.
Chandler, R. B., and J. A. Royle. 2013. Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations. Annals of Applied Statistics 7:936-954.
Clare, J., S. T. Mckinney, J. E. Depue, and C. S. Loftin. 2017. Pairing field methods to improve inference in wildlife surveys. Ecological Applications 27:2031-2047.
de Valpine, P., D. Turek, C. J. Paciorek, C. Anderson-Bergman, D. T. Lang, and R. Bodik. 2017. Programming with models: writing statistical algorithms for general model structures with NIMBLE. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 26:403-413.
Efford, M. G. 2004. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106:598-610.
Efford, M. G., D. K. Dawson, and D. L. Borchers. 2009. Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. Ecology 90:2676-2682.
Efford, M. G., and C. M. Hunter. 2018. Spatial capture-mark-resight estimation of animal population density. Biometrics 74:411-420.
Gerber, B. D., J. S. Ivan, and K. P. Burnham. 2014. Estimating the abundance of rare and elusive carnivores from photographic-sampling data when the population size is very small. Population Ecology 56:463-470.
Gopalaswamy, A. M., J. A. Royle, M. Delampady, J. D. Nichols, K. U. Karanth, and D. W. W. Macdonald. 2012. Density estimation in tiger populations: combining information for strong inference. Ecology 93:1741-1751.
Lele, S., R. K. Nadeem, and B. Schmuland. 2010. Estimability and likelihood inference for generalized linear mixed models using data cloning. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105:1617-1625.
Lukacs, P. M., and K. P. Burnham. 2005. Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling: review of DNA-based capture-recapture. Molecular Ecology 14:3909-3919.
Marques, T. A., L. Thomas, and J. A. Royle. 2011. A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data: comment. Ecology 92:526-528.
Murphy, S., B. Augustine, J. R. Adams, L. P. Waits, and J. J. Cox. 2018. Integrating multiple genetic detection methods to estimate population density of social and territorial carnivores. Ecosphere 9:e02479.
Ponciano, J. M., J. G. Burleigh, E. L. Braun, and M. L. Taper. 2012. Assessing parameter identifiability in phylogenetic models using data cloning. Systematic Biology 61:955-972.
R Development Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Ramsey, D. S. L., P. A. Caley, and A. Robley. 2015. Estimating population density from presence-absence data using a spatially explicit model. Journal of Wildlife Management 79:491-499.
Rich, L., M. J. Kelly, R. Sollmann, A. J. Noss, L. Maffei, R. L. Arispe, A. Paviolo, C. D. De Angelo, Y. E. Di Blanco, and M. S. Di Bitetti. 2014. Comparing capture-recapture, mark-resight, and spatial mark-resight models for estimating puma densities via camera traps. Journal of Mammalogy 95:382-391.
Royle, J. A., R. B. Chandler, R. Sollmann, and B. Gardner.2013. Spatial capture-recapture. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Royle, J. A., R. M. Dorazio, and W. A. Link. 2007. Analysis of multinomial models with unknown index using data augmentation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 16:67-85.
Royle, J. A., A. K. Fuller, and C. Sutherland. 2018. Unifying population and landscape ecology with spatial capture-recapture. Ecography 41:444-456.
Sollmann, R., B. Gardner, and J. L. Belant. 2012. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models? PLoS ONE 7:e34575.
Sollmann, R., B. Gardner, A. W. Parsons, J. J. Stocking, B. T. McClintock, T. R. Simons, K. H. Pollock, and A. F. O'Connell. 2013a. A spatial mark-resight model augmented with telemetry data. Ecology 94:553-559.
Sollmann, R., N. M. Tôrres, M. M. Furtado, A. T. de Almeida Jácomo, F. Palomares, S. Roques, and L. Silveira. 2013b. Combining camera-trapping and noninvasive genetic data in a spatial capture-recapture framework improves density estimates for the jaguar. Biological Conservation 167:242-247.
Walter, B. A., and J. L. Moore. 2005. The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28:815-829.
Whittington, J., M. Hebblewhite, and R. B. Chandler. 2018. Generalized spatial mark-resight models with an application to grizzly bears. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:157-168.

Auteurs

Mahdieh Tourani (M)

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.

Pierre Dupont (P)

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.

Muhammad Ali Nawaz (MA)

Department of Animal Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Snow Leopard Trust, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.

Richard Bischof (R)

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH