Classification of primary liver cancer with immunosuppression mechanisms and correlation with genomic alterations.
Liver cancer
Regulatory T cell
Tumor microenvironment
Tumor-associated macrophage
Journal
EBioMedicine
ISSN: 2352-3964
Titre abrégé: EBioMedicine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101647039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
30
09
2019
revised:
21
01
2020
accepted:
22
01
2020
pubmed:
1
3
2020
medline:
18
12
2020
entrez:
1
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The tumor microenvironment can be classified into immunologically active "inflamed" tumors and inactive "non-inflamed" tumors based on the infiltration of cytotoxic immune cells. Previous studies on liver cancer have reported a superior prognosis for inflamed tumors compared to non-inflamed tumors. However, liver cancer is highly heterogeneous immunologically and genetically, and a finer classification of the liver cancer microenvironment may improve our understanding of its immunological diversity and response to immune therapy. We characterized the immune gene signatures of 234 primary liver cancers, mainly virus-related, from a Japanese population using RNA-Seq of tumors and matched non-tumorous hepatitis livers. We then compared them with the somatic alterations detected using the whole-genome sequencing. Liver cancers expressed lower levels of immune marker genes than non-tumorous hepatitis livers, indicating immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Several immunosuppression mechanisms functioned actively and mutually exclusively, resulting in four immune subclasses of liver cancer: tumor-associated macrophage (TAM), CTNNB1, cytolytic activity (CYT), and regulatory T cell (Treg). The CYT and Treg subclasses represented inflamed tumors, while the TAM and CTNNB1 subclasses represented non-inflamed tumors. The TAM subclass, which comprised 31% of liver cancers, showed a poor survival, expressed elevated levels of extracellular matrix genes, and was associated with somatic mutations of chromatin regulator ARID2. The results of cell line experiments suggested a functional link between ARID2 and chemokine production by liver cancer cells. Primary liver cancer was classified into four subclasses based on mutually exclusive mechanisms for immunosuppression. This classification indicate the importance of immunosuppression mechanisms, such as TAM and Treg, as therapeutic targets for liver cancer. The Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The tumor microenvironment can be classified into immunologically active "inflamed" tumors and inactive "non-inflamed" tumors based on the infiltration of cytotoxic immune cells. Previous studies on liver cancer have reported a superior prognosis for inflamed tumors compared to non-inflamed tumors. However, liver cancer is highly heterogeneous immunologically and genetically, and a finer classification of the liver cancer microenvironment may improve our understanding of its immunological diversity and response to immune therapy.
METHODS
METHODS
We characterized the immune gene signatures of 234 primary liver cancers, mainly virus-related, from a Japanese population using RNA-Seq of tumors and matched non-tumorous hepatitis livers. We then compared them with the somatic alterations detected using the whole-genome sequencing.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Liver cancers expressed lower levels of immune marker genes than non-tumorous hepatitis livers, indicating immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Several immunosuppression mechanisms functioned actively and mutually exclusively, resulting in four immune subclasses of liver cancer: tumor-associated macrophage (TAM), CTNNB1, cytolytic activity (CYT), and regulatory T cell (Treg). The CYT and Treg subclasses represented inflamed tumors, while the TAM and CTNNB1 subclasses represented non-inflamed tumors. The TAM subclass, which comprised 31% of liver cancers, showed a poor survival, expressed elevated levels of extracellular matrix genes, and was associated with somatic mutations of chromatin regulator ARID2. The results of cell line experiments suggested a functional link between ARID2 and chemokine production by liver cancer cells.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Primary liver cancer was classified into four subclasses based on mutually exclusive mechanisms for immunosuppression. This classification indicate the importance of immunosuppression mechanisms, such as TAM and Treg, as therapeutic targets for liver cancer.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
The Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32113157
pii: S2352-3964(20)30034-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102659
pmc: PMC7048625
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
ARID2 protein, human
0
Chemokines
0
Transcription Factors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102659Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jul;36(7):980-6
pubmed: 22446942
Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;68(16):6779-88
pubmed: 18701503
Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 15;69(18):7385-92
pubmed: 19723656
J Hepatol. 2009 Nov;51(5):890-7
pubmed: 19747749
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jun;132(7):2328-39
pubmed: 17570208
BMC Immunol. 2012 Feb 15;13:9
pubmed: 22336179
Immunity. 2013 Oct 17;39(4):782-95
pubmed: 24138885
J Hepatol. 2017 Feb;66(2):363-373
pubmed: 27742377
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Dec;12(12):681-700
pubmed: 26484443
J Clin Invest. 2017 Sep 1;127(9):3472-3483
pubmed: 28825599
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 26;8(1):1136
pubmed: 29070816
Hum Pathol. 2009 Mar;40(3):381-9
pubmed: 18992916
Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2492-2502
pubmed: 28434648
Cancer Immunol Res. 2013 Jul;1(1):32-42
pubmed: 24777248
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):940-952
pubmed: 29875066
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 06;8:14648
pubmed: 28262751
J Hepatol. 2010 Mar;52(3):370-9
pubmed: 19720422
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 May;4(5):419-30
pubmed: 26968206
Front Oncol. 2018 Mar 12;8:49
pubmed: 29594035
J Hepatol. 2017 Oct;67(4):727-738
pubmed: 28532995
Cell. 2015 Jan 15;160(1-2):48-61
pubmed: 25594174
Gut. 2012 Mar;61(3):427-38
pubmed: 21930732
Cell. 2017 Jun 15;169(7):1327-1341.e23
pubmed: 28622513
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 18;114(29):E5900-E5909
pubmed: 28674001
Nat Methods. 2015 May;12(5):453-7
pubmed: 25822800
Cancer Discov. 2018 Jun;8(6):730-749
pubmed: 29510987
Nat Genet. 2016 May;48(5):500-9
pubmed: 27064257
Science. 2017 Jan 20;355(6322):
pubmed: 28104840
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 20;25(18):2586-93
pubmed: 17577038
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25(7):2116-2126
pubmed: 30373752
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jun;11(6):789-800
pubmed: 26845192
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):610-8
pubmed: 21245428
Genes Dev. 2005 Jul 15;19(14):1662-7
pubmed: 15985610
Cancer Lett. 2012 May 28;318(2):154-61
pubmed: 22182446
Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):812-826
pubmed: 28624577
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):e173290
pubmed: 29049607
Science. 2018 Oct 12;362(6411):
pubmed: 30309915
Nat Med. 2014 May;20(5):518-23
pubmed: 24728410
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;12(4):298-306
pubmed: 22419253
Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68(3):1025-1041
pubmed: 29603348
J Exp Med. 2013 Aug 26;210(9):1695-710
pubmed: 23897981
Hepatology. 2008 Jun;47(6):2059-67
pubmed: 18506891
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;29(6):919-28
pubmed: 26651253
Immunity. 2014 Jul 17;41(1):49-61
pubmed: 25035953
Cell. 2017 Jun 15;169(7):1342-1356.e16
pubmed: 28622514
Cell Death Dis. 2018 Mar 19;9(4):422
pubmed: 29556041
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612
pubmed: 24113773
Nature. 2016 May 23;534(7607):402-6
pubmed: 27281199
Hepatology. 1999 Jul;30(1):143-50
pubmed: 10385650
Nature. 2015 Jul 9;523(7559):231-5
pubmed: 25970248
Cell. 2016 Oct 6;167(2):397-404.e9
pubmed: 27667683
J Hepatol. 2017 May;66(5):942-951
pubmed: 28238438