Supporting the Development of Evidence-Informed Policy Options: An Economic Evaluation of Hypertension Management in Ghana.


Journal

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
ISSN: 1524-4733
Titre abrégé: Value Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
received: 14 12 2018
revised: 12 07 2019
accepted: 05 09 2019
entrez: 2 3 2020
pubmed: 3 3 2020
medline: 23 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Universal healthcare coverage in low- and middle-income countries requires challenging resource allocation decisions. Health technology assessment is one important tool to support such decision making. The International Decision Support Initiative worked with the Ghanaian Ministry of Health to strengthen health technology assessment capacity building, identifying hypertension as a priority topic area for a relevant case study. Based on guidance from a national technical working group of researchers and policy makers, an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis were undertaken for the main antihypertensive medicines used for uncomplicated, essential hypertension. The analysis aimed to address specific policy questions relevant to the National Health Insurance Scheme. The evaluation found that first-line management of essential hypertension with diuretics has an incremental cost per disability-adjusted life-year avoided of GH¢ 276 ($179 in 2017, 4% of gross national income per capita) compared with no treatment. Calcium channel blockers were more effective than diuretics but at a higher incremental cost: GH¢ 11 061 per disability-adjusted life-year avoided ($7189 in 2017; 160% of gross national income per capita). Diuretics provide better health outcomes at a lower cost than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or beta-blockers. Budget impact analysis highlighted the potential for cost saving through enhanced price negotiation and increased use of better-value drugs. We also illustrate how savings could be reinvested to improve population health. Economic evaluation enabled decision makers to assess hypertension medicines in a Ghanaian context and estimate the impact of using such evidence to change policy. This study contributes to addressing challenges associated with the drive for universal healthcare coverage in the context of constrained budgets.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32113622
pii: S1098-3015(19)35131-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2749
pmc: PMC7065042
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antihypertensive Agents 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

171-179

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Int J Pharm Pract. 2016 Oct;24(5):341-8
pubmed: 26990673
BMJ. 2009 Mar 17;338:b880
pubmed: 19297312
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):250-8
pubmed: 26858377
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 30;8(7):e65174
pubmed: 23935815
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):929-935
pubmed: 27987642
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Aug;17(8):1031-43
pubmed: 22809238
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0165151
pubmed: 27832082
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 19;141(8):614-27
pubmed: 15492341
Ghana Med J. 2012 Jun;46(2):76-84
pubmed: 22942455
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1475-82
pubmed: 18573856
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2129-43
pubmed: 23245605
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967
pubmed: 26724178
Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1383-93
pubmed: 18809808
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23
pubmed: 26475018
Lancet. 2007 Jan 20;369(9557):201-7
pubmed: 17240286
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):921-928
pubmed: 27987641
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001 Spring;17(2):236-43
pubmed: 11446135
F1000Res. 2017 Dec 11;6:2119
pubmed: 29333249
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Jan 19;10:4
pubmed: 21247436

Auteurs

Mohamed Gad (M)

Global Health Development group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, International Decision Support Initiative, London, England, UK. Electronic address: m.gad@imperial.ac.uk.

Johanne Lord (J)

Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, UK.

Kalipso Chalkidou (K)

Global Health Development group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, International Decision Support Initiative, London, England, UK.

Brian Asare (B)

Ghana National Drugs Programme, Ministry of Health, Accra, Ghana.

Martha Gyansa Lutterodt (MG)

Pharmaceutical Services, Ministry of Health, Accra, Ghana.

Francis Ruiz (F)

Global Health Development group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, International Decision Support Initiative, London, England, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH