Identification of factors important to study quality in exercise performance studies.

Criteria list Delphi method Exercise science Quality assessment Research methodology Sport science

Journal

Journal of science and medicine in sport
ISSN: 1878-1861
Titre abrégé: J Sci Med Sport
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9812598

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 13 09 2019
revised: 10 12 2019
accepted: 29 01 2020
pubmed: 3 3 2020
medline: 26 11 2020
entrez: 3 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to identify factors important to quality in exercise performance studies, specifically in the domains of aerobic, anaerobic and strength exercise. Factors related to diet and body composition were also targeted as these often influence or change with exercise. Cross-sectional study employing focus groups and a modified Delphi method. Academic staff and research students within the discipline of exercise science in a research-intensive university participated in focus groups to generate discipline-specific factors important to study quality. These factors were subsequently presented in a modified Delphi survey to a panel of international researchers with expertise in at least one of the domains. Item consensus was defined as >70% agreement on importance. The initial round contained all items generated from the focus groups. Subsequent rounds only presented items where consensus was not achieved, and additional items suggested by participants. The academic staff (n = 10) and research students (n = 9) generated 22 items generic to all exercise performance studies and 71 domain-specific items. Over two Delphi survey rounds involving 18 international researchers, consensus on importance was achieved for 19 generic items. Identified factors addressed exercise testing and prescription protocols, equipment and compliance to interventions. Consensus on 66 specific items was achieved but was limited by small domain-specific participant numbers (4-8). Numerous discipline-specific factors were identified as important to study quality. These factors can subsequently be used to inform the development of a tool to evaluate study quality in exercise performance research or inform best clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32115356
pii: S1440-2440(19)31275-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.01.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

782-787

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Mark Guosheng Liu (MG)

Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: mliu7879@uni.sydney.edu.au.

Jacqueline Raymond (J)

Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia; Work Integrated Learning, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia.

Ollie Jay (O)

Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.

Helen O'Connor (H)

Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH