A Multidisciplinary Technique for Concurrent Panniculectomy-Living Donor Renal Transplantation.
Journal
Annals of plastic surgery
ISSN: 1536-3708
Titre abrégé: Ann Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7805336
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
3
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
3
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, it has been shown that panniculectomy concurrent to living donor renal transplantation is a safe option for management of renal transplant recipients with a large focal pannus. This combined management requires precise coordination of teams. We describe the technique, timing, and sequence for combined renal transplantation and panniculectomy. We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent simultaneous living donor renal transplantation-panniculectomy from 2015 to 2019. A multi-team approach that included urology, transplant, and plastic surgery was used to perform the combined operations. Typically, the plastic surgery team initiates the operation by performing the panniculectomy. This is followed by kidney transplantation and graft anastomosis. The plastic surgery team then completes the operation with closure of the wound. Twenty patients were identified. Most were male (12:8) with a mean age of 55 years and an average body mass index of 35 kg/m. The mean total operative duration was 394 minutes. On average, 17% of operating time was devoted to panniculectomy. At 90 days follow-up, there was 100% graft survival and all patients had primary graft function. There was a 25% wound complications rate and a 15% reoperation rate. By performing panniculectomy first in the sequence, concurrent panniculectomy provides wide exposure and a large operative field for transplantation. Wound closure by plastic surgeons may mitigate the high complication rate commonly seen in obese patients with end-stage renal disease. Future studies are needed to evaluate the cost-benefit of the combined living donor renal transplantation-panniculectomy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recently, it has been shown that panniculectomy concurrent to living donor renal transplantation is a safe option for management of renal transplant recipients with a large focal pannus. This combined management requires precise coordination of teams. We describe the technique, timing, and sequence for combined renal transplantation and panniculectomy.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent simultaneous living donor renal transplantation-panniculectomy from 2015 to 2019. A multi-team approach that included urology, transplant, and plastic surgery was used to perform the combined operations. Typically, the plastic surgery team initiates the operation by performing the panniculectomy. This is followed by kidney transplantation and graft anastomosis. The plastic surgery team then completes the operation with closure of the wound.
RESULTS
Twenty patients were identified. Most were male (12:8) with a mean age of 55 years and an average body mass index of 35 kg/m. The mean total operative duration was 394 minutes. On average, 17% of operating time was devoted to panniculectomy. At 90 days follow-up, there was 100% graft survival and all patients had primary graft function. There was a 25% wound complications rate and a 15% reoperation rate.
CONCLUSION
By performing panniculectomy first in the sequence, concurrent panniculectomy provides wide exposure and a large operative field for transplantation. Wound closure by plastic surgeons may mitigate the high complication rate commonly seen in obese patients with end-stage renal disease. Future studies are needed to evaluate the cost-benefit of the combined living donor renal transplantation-panniculectomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32118633
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002297
pii: 00000637-202004000-00025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
455-462Références
Lesage J, Gill JS. Management of the obese kidney transplant candidate. Transplant Rev. 2017;31:35–41.
Lynch RJ, Ranney DN, Shijie C, et al. Obesity, surgical site infection, and outcome following renal transplantation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:1014–1020.
Kuo JH, Troppmann C, Perez RV, et al. Panniculectomy in preparation for renal transplantation: A new indication for an old procedure to reduce renal transplantation–associated wound complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1236–1240.
Troppmann C, Santhanakrishnan C, Kuo JH, et al. Impact of panniculectomy on transplant candidacy of obese patients with chronic kidney disease declined for kidney transplantation because of a high-risk abdominal panniculus: a pilot study. Surgery. 2016;159:1612–1622.
Bailey CM, Troppmann C, Kuo J, et al. Panniculectomy in end-stage renal disease: six-year experience of performing panniculectomy in preparation for renal transplant. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(suppl 1):S9–S11.
Mundra LS, Rubio GA, AlQattan HT, et al. Panniculectomy Outcomes in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease in Preparation for Renal Transplant. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42:633–638.
Ngaage LM, Elegbede A, Tadisina KK, et al. Panniculectomy at the time of living donor renal transplantation: an eight year experience. Am J Transplant. 2019;19:2284–2293.
Simson N, Parker S, Stonier T, et al. Incisional hernia in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review. Am Surg. 2018;84:930–937.
Maroz N, Simman R. Wound healing in patients with impaired kidney function. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2014;5:2–7.
Ooms LS, Verhelst J, Jeekel J, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation: an analysis of 1,564 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2016;159:1407–1411.
Lafranca JA, IJermans JN, Betjes MG, et al. Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2015;13:111.
Mioton L, Buck D II, Gart M, et al. A multivariate regression analysis of panniculectomy outcomes: does plastic surgery training matter? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:604e–612e.
Reid CM, Brandel MG, Gosman AA. Comparison of surgeon specialty in open ventral hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78(5 suppl 4):S212–S216.
Diaconu SC, McNichols CHL, Ngaage LM, et al. Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy decreases complications in ventral hernia repair with concurrent panniculectomy [published online ahead of print December 17, 2018]. Hernia.
Baglien B, Ngaage LM, Rosen C, et al. Outcomes of complex abdominal wall reconstruction at the time of CRS and HIPEC. Surg Oncol. 2019;30:27–32.
Dohmen PM, Misfeld M, Borger MA, et al. Closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11:395–402.
Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M. Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:e176233.
Henry Kaiser Foundation. Hospital adjusted expenses per inpatient day by ownership. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/state-indicator/expenses-per-inpatient-day-by-ownership/#notes. Accessed May 24, May 2019.
Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, et al. US Renal Data System 2018 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(suppl 1):Svii–Sxxii, S1–S772.
Cassera MA, Zheng B, Martinec DV, et al. Surgical time independently affected by surgical team size. Am J Surg. 2009;198:216–222.
Zheng B, Panton ON, Al-Tayeb TA. Operative length independently affected by surgical team size: data from 2 Canadian hospitals. Can J Surg. 2012;55:371–376.
Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2015 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(suppl 1):21–116.
Bos EM, Leuvenink HGD, van Goor H, et al. Kidney grafts from brain dead donors: inferior quality or opportunity for improvement? Kidney Int. 2007;72:797–805.
de Groot IB, Veen JI, van der Boog PJ, et al; PARTNER-study group. Difference in quality of life, fatigue and societal participation between living and deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2013;27:E415–E423.