Environmental and economical assessment for a sustainable Zn/air battery.
Energy storage
Environmental impact
Life cycle assessment
Zn/air battery
Journal
Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
03
10
2019
revised:
10
02
2020
accepted:
17
02
2020
pubmed:
3
3
2020
medline:
27
6
2020
entrez:
3
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Metal/Air batteries are being developed and soon could become competitive with other battery technologies already in the market, such as Li-ion battery. The main problem to be addressed is the cyclability, although some progress has been recently achieved. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the manufacturing process of a Zn/Air battery is presented in this article, including raw extraction and process of materials and battery assembly at laboratory scale (cradle to gate approach). The results indicate that Zn/Air battery can be fabricated with low environmental impacts in most categories and only four deserve attention (still being low impacts), such as Human Toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Resource Depletion (the later one depending mainly on Zn use, which is not a critical material, but has a strong impact on this category). Cathode fabrication arises as the subassembly with higher impacts, followed by membrane, then anode and finally electrolyte. An economic cost calculation indicates that if cyclability of Zn/Air batteries is achieved, they can become competitive with other technologies already in the market.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32120147
pii: S0045-6535(20)30466-5
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126273
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Metals
0
Lithium
9FN79X2M3F
Zinc
J41CSQ7QDS
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
126273Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.