Active efficient coding explains the development of binocular vision and its failure in amblyopia.
Accommodation, Ocular
/ physiology
Amblyopia
/ physiopathology
Computer Simulation
Eye
/ growth & development
Eye Movements
/ physiology
Humans
Learning
/ physiology
Models, Biological
Refraction, Ocular
/ physiology
Vision Disparity
/ physiology
Vision, Binocular
/ physiology
Visual Cortex
/ growth & development
accommodation
active perception
amblyopia
efficient coding
vergence
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 03 2020
17 03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
4
3
2020
medline:
14
7
2020
entrez:
4
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The development of vision during the first months of life is an active process that comprises the learning of appropriate neural representations and the learning of accurate eye movements. While it has long been suspected that the two learning processes are coupled, there is still no widely accepted theoretical framework describing this joint development. Here, we propose a computational model of the development of active binocular vision to fill this gap. The model is based on a formulation of the active efficient coding theory, which proposes that eye movements as well as stimulus encoding are jointly adapted to maximize the overall coding efficiency. Under healthy conditions, the model self-calibrates to perform accurate vergence and accommodation eye movements. It exploits disparity cues to deduce the direction of defocus, which leads to coordinated vergence and accommodation responses. In a simulated anisometropic case, where the refraction power of the two eyes differs, an amblyopia-like state develops in which the foveal region of one eye is suppressed due to inputs from the other eye. After correcting for refractive errors, the model can only reach healthy performance levels if receptive fields are still plastic, in line with findings on a critical period for binocular vision development. Overall, our model offers a unifying conceptual framework for understanding the development of binocular vision.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32123102
pii: 1908100117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908100117
pmc: PMC7084066
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6156-6162Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Annu Rev Psychol. 1981;32:477-522
pubmed: 7015996
J Neurosci. 1987 May;7(5):1340-51
pubmed: 3572484
Vision Res. 2015 Sep;114:4-16
pubmed: 25906685
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38
pubmed: 20068583
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1193-216
pubmed: 11520932
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Apr;5(4):356-63
pubmed: 11896400
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Nov 23;13(1):51-62
pubmed: 22108672
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002991
pubmed: 23555225
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 27;56(2):1193-207
pubmed: 25626970
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 23;37(34):8216-8226
pubmed: 28743725
Vis Neurosci. 2018 Jan;35:E018
pubmed: 29905118
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Jun;69(6 Pt 2):066138
pubmed: 15244698
Vision Res. 2015 Sep;114:17-30
pubmed: 25637854
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 01;52(6):3595-603
pubmed: 21296822
Network. 2000 Aug;11(3):191-210
pubmed: 11014668
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 17;117(11):6156-6162
pubmed: 32123102
J Vis. 2009 Mar 20;9(3):13.1-22
pubmed: 19757952
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 Sep;27(5):417-39
pubmed: 17718882
Perception. 2004;33(12):1463-73
pubmed: 15729913
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Apr 1;58(4):2329-2340
pubmed: 28431435
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Sep;21(3):467-76
pubmed: 7275532
J Vis. 2016;16(6):17
pubmed: 27115522
J AAPOS. 2006 Feb;10(1):37-43
pubmed: 16527678
Vision Res. 1986;26(4):621-30
pubmed: 3739237
Strabismus. 2016 Jun;24(2):51-62
pubmed: 27220458
Science. 1970 May 15;168(3933):869-71
pubmed: 5444065
Nature. 2017 Jul 27;547(7664):449-452
pubmed: 28700575
J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106-54
pubmed: 14449617
Front Psychol. 2012 May 08;3:130
pubmed: 22586414
J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:1003-17
pubmed: 14084161
Brain Res. 1973 Sep 28;60(1):224-30
pubmed: 4744763
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 20;7:44800
pubmed: 28317909
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(5):e1003005
pubmed: 23675290
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jan;2(1):79-87
pubmed: 10195184
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):564-76
pubmed: 18199466
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 2;112(22):6908-13
pubmed: 26038544
Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Mar;58(3):176-82
pubmed: 4600340
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):895-903
pubmed: 16751032
Neuron. 2012 Jul 26;75(2):230-49
pubmed: 22841309
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992 Jul;12(3):307-18
pubmed: 1454368
J Vis. 2009 Oct 05;9(11):4.1-18
pubmed: 20053067
Vision Res. 1997 Dec;37(23):3311-25
pubmed: 9425546
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Jan;23(1):1-8
pubmed: 16478055
Cereb Cortex. 1996 Mar-Apr;6(2):297-310
pubmed: 8670658
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980 Jan;19(1):60-74
pubmed: 7350136
Front Neurorobot. 2017 Nov 03;11:58
pubmed: 29163121