Sex and APOE ε4 genotype modify the Alzheimer's disease serum metabolome.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 03 2020
Historique:
received: 22 05 2019
accepted: 04 02 2020
entrez: 4 3 2020
pubmed: 4 3 2020
medline: 23 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) can, in part, be considered a metabolic disease. Besides age, female sex and APOE ε4 genotype represent strong risk factors for AD that also give rise to large metabolic differences. We systematically investigated group-specific metabolic alterations by conducting stratified association analyses of 139 serum metabolites in 1,517 individuals from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative with AD biomarkers. We observed substantial sex differences in effects of 15 metabolites with partially overlapping differences for APOE ε4 status groups. Several group-specific metabolic alterations were not observed in unstratified analyses using sex and APOE ε4 as covariates. Combined stratification revealed further subgroup-specific metabolic effects limited to APOE ε4+ females. The observed metabolic alterations suggest that females experience greater impairment of mitochondrial energy production than males. Dissecting metabolic heterogeneity in AD pathogenesis can therefore enable grading the biomedical relevance for specific pathways within specific subgroups, guiding the way to personalized medicine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32123170
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14959-w
pii: 10.1038/s41467-020-14959-w
pmc: PMC7052223
doi:

Substances chimiques

Apolipoproteins E 0
Biomarkers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1148

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R03 AG054936
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG061356
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG024904
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG017917
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG059093
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG057452
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG057457
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG026572
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG015819
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG046171
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG046152
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG010161
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG055549
Pays : United States
Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : R01 LM012535
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG061359
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG061872
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG058942
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG051550
Pays : United States

Références

Association, As 2017 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 13, 325–373 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.02.001
Hebert, L. E., Weuve, J., Scherr, P. A. & Evans, D. A. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology 80, 1778–1783 (2013).
pubmed: 23390181 pmcid: 3719424 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5
Mielke, M. M., Vemuri, P. & Rocca, W. A. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clin. Epidemiol. 6, 37–48 (2014).
pubmed: 24470773 pmcid: 3891487 doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S37929
Prince, M. et al. Recent global trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia, and survival with dementia. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 8, 23 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0188-8
Fiest, K. M. et al. The prevalence and incidence of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 43, S51–S82 (2016).
pubmed: 27307128 doi: 10.1017/cjn.2016.36
Matthews, F. E. et al. A two decade dementia incidence comparison from the cognitive function and ageing studies I and II. Nat. Commun. 7, 11398 (2016).
pubmed: 27092707 pmcid: 4838896 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11398
Nebel, R. A. et al. Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer’s disease: a call to action. Alzheimer’s Dement. 14, 1171–1183 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.04.008
Mortensen, E. L. & Hogh, P. A gender difference in the association between APOE genotype and age-related cognitive decline. Neurology 57, 89–95 (2001).
pubmed: 11445633 doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.1.89
Altmann, A., Tian, L., Henderson, V. W. & Greicius, M. D. Alzheimer’sDisease Neuroimaging Initiative Investigators. Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 75, 563–573 (2014).
pubmed: 24623176 pmcid: 4117990 doi: 10.1002/ana.24135
Beydoun, M. A. et al. Sex differences in the association of the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele with incidence of dementia, cognitive impairment, and decline. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 720–731 e724 (2012).
pubmed: 20619505 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.05.017
Corder, E. H. et al. The biphasic relationship between regional brain senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangle distributions: modification by age, sex, and APOE polymorphism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1019, 24–28 (2004).
pubmed: 15246987 doi: 10.1196/annals.1297.005
Mahley, R. W. & Huang, Y. Apolipoprotein e sets the stage: response to injury triggers neuropathology. Neuron 76, 871–885 (2012).
pubmed: 23217737 pmcid: 4891195 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.020
Neu, S. C. et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype and sex risk factors for alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 74, 1178–1189 (2017).
pubmed: 28846757 pmcid: 5759346 doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2188
Damoiseaux, J. S. et al. Gender modulates the APOE epsilon4 effect in healthy older adults: convergent evidence from functional brain connectivity and spinal fluid tau levels. J. Neurosci. 32, 8254–8262 (2012).
pubmed: 22699906 pmcid: 3394933 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0305-12.2012
Heise, V. et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype, gender and age modulate connectivity of the hippocampus in healthy adults. Neuroimage 98, 23–30 (2014).
pubmed: 24814213 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.081
Sampedro, F. et al. APOE-by-sex interactions on brain structure and metabolism in healthy elderly controls. Oncotarget 6, 26663–26674 (2015).
pubmed: 26397226 pmcid: 4694943 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5185
Ferretti, M. T. et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer disease—the gateway to precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 457–469 (2018).
pubmed: 29985474 doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0032-9
Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. Age, sex, and APOE epsilon4 effects on memory, brain structure, and beta-amyloid across the adult life span. JAMA Neurol. 72, 511–519 (2015).
pubmed: 25775353 pmcid: 4428984 doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4821
Sundermann, E. E., Tran, M., Maki, P. M. & Bondi, M. W. Sex differences in the association between apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele and Alzheimer’s disease markers. Alzheimer’s Dement. (Amst.) 10, 438–447 (2018).
Caracciolo, B. et al. Occurrence of cognitive impairment and dementia in the community: a 9-year-long prospective study. Neurology 70, 1778–1785 (2008).
pubmed: 18184916 doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000288180.21984.cb
Roberts, R. O. et al. The incidence of MCI differs by subtype and is higher in men: the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Neurology 78, 342–351 (2012).
pubmed: 22282647 pmcid: 3280046 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182452862
Hyman, B. T. et al. Apolipoprotein E and cognitive change in an elderly population. Ann. Neurol. 40, 55–66 (1996).
pubmed: 8687193 doi: 10.1002/ana.410400111
Buckley, R. F. et al. Sex, amyloid, and APOE epsilon4 and risk of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Findings from three well-characterized cohorts. Alzheimer’s Dement. 14, 1193-1203 (2018).
Krumsiek, J. et al. Gender-specific pathway differences in the human serum metabolome. Metabolomics 11, 1815–1833 (2015).
pubmed: 26491425 pmcid: 4605991 doi: 10.1007/s11306-015-0829-0
Mittelstrass, K. et al. Discovery of sexual dimorphisms in metabolic and genetic biomarkers. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002215 (2011).
pubmed: 21852955 pmcid: 3154959 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002215
Johnson, L. A., Torres, E. R., Impey, S., Stevens, J. F. & Raber, J. Apolipoprotein E4 and insulin resistance interact to impair cognition and alter the epigenome and metabolome. Sci. Rep. 7, 43701 (2017).
pubmed: 28272510 pmcid: 5341123 doi: 10.1038/srep43701
Kochhar, S. et al. Probing gender-specific metabolism differences in humans by nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabonomics. Anal. Biochem. 352, 274–281 (2006).
pubmed: 16600169 doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.02.033
Dunn, W. B. et al. Molecular phenotyping of a UK population: defining the human serum metabolome. Metabolomics 11, 9–26 (2015).
pubmed: 25598764 doi: 10.1007/s11306-014-0707-1
Gonzalez-Covarrubias, V. et al. Lipidomics of familial longevity. Aging Cell 12, 426–434 (2013).
pubmed: 23451766 pmcid: 3709127 doi: 10.1111/acel.12064
Menni, C. et al. Metabolomic markers reveal novel pathways of ageing and early development in human populations. Int. J. Epidemiol. 42, 1111–1119 (2013).
pubmed: 23838602 pmcid: 3781000 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt094
Cai, H. et al. Metabolic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease and related neurodegenerative disorders. Curr. Alzheimer’s Res. 9, 5–17 (2012).
doi: 10.2174/156720512799015064
Sonntag, K. C. et al. Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease is associated with inherent changes in bioenergetics profiles. Sci. Rep. 7, 14038 (2017).
pubmed: 29070876 pmcid: 5656579 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14420-x
Procaccini, C. et al. Role of metabolism in neurodegenerative disorders. Metabolomics 65, 1376–1390 (2016).
Yu, Z. et al. Human serum metabolic profiles are age dependent. Aging Cell 11, 960–967 (2012).
pubmed: 22834969 pmcid: 3533791 doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00865.x
Sekula, P. et al. A metabolome-wide association study of kidney function and disease in the general population. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 1175–1188 (2016).
pubmed: 26449609 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014111099
Tudorache, I. F., Trusca, V. G. & Gafencu, A. V. Apolipoprotein E—a multifunctional protein with implications in various pathologies as a result of its structural features. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 15, 359–365 (2017).
pubmed: 28660014 pmcid: 5476973 doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2017.05.003
Teslovich, T. M. et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature 466, 707–713 (2010).
pubmed: 20686565 pmcid: 3039276 doi: 10.1038/nature09270
Shin, S. Y. et al. An atlas of genetic influences on human blood metabolites. Nat. Genet. 46, 543–5502 (2014).
pubmed: 24816252 pmcid: 4064254 doi: 10.1038/ng.2982
Mielke, M. M. et al. The association between plasma ceramides and sphingomyelins and risk of alzheimer’s disease differs by sex and APOE in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 60, 819–828 (2017).
doi: 10.3233/JAD-160925
Long, T. et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies common-to-rare variants associated with human blood metabolites. Nat. Genet. 49, 568–578 (2017).
pubmed: 28263315 doi: 10.1038/ng.3809
Mielke, M. M. et al. Serum ceramides increase the risk of Alzheimer disease: the Women’s Health and Aging Study II. Neurology 79, 633–641 (2012).
pubmed: 22815558 pmcid: 3414665 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318264e380
Tynkkynen, J. et al. Association of branched-chain amino acids and other circulating metabolites with risk of incident dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective study in eight cohorts. Alzheimer’s Dement. 14, 723–733 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.003
Trushina, E., Dutta, T., Persson, X. M., Mielke, M. M. & Petersen, R. C. Identification of altered metabolic pathways in plasma and CSF in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease using metabolomics. PLoS ONE 8, e63644 (2013).
pubmed: 23700429 pmcid: 3658985 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063644
Oresic, M. et al. Metabolome in progression to Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry 1, e57 (2011).
pubmed: 22832349 pmcid: 3309497 doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.55
Toledo, J. B. et al. Metabolic network failures in Alzheimer’s disease: a biochemical road map. Alzheimer’s Dement. 13, 965–984 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.020
Gonzalez-Dominguez, R., Garcia-Barrera, T. & Gomez-Ariza, J. L. Combination of metabolomic and phospholipid-profiling approaches for the study of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Proteom. 104, 37–47 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.01.014
Whiley, L. et al. Evidence of altered phosphatidylcholine metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 271–278 (2014).
pubmed: 24041970 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.001
Proitsi, P. et al. Plasma lipidomics analysis finds long chain cholesteryl esters to be associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry 5, e494 (2015).
pubmed: 25585166 pmcid: 4312824 doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.127
Graham, S. F. et al. Untargeted metabolomic analysis of human plasma indicates differentially affected polyamine and L-arginine metabolism in mild cognitive impairment subjects converting to Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 10, e0119452 (2015).
pubmed: 25803028 pmcid: 4372431 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119452
Varma, V. R. et al. Brain and blood metabolite signatures of pathology and progression in Alzheimer disease: a targeted metabolomics study. PLoS Med. 15, e1002482 (2018).
pubmed: 29370177 pmcid: 5784884 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002482
Pan, X. et al. Metabolomic profiling of bile acids in clinical and experimental samples of Alzheimer’s disease. Metabolites 7, https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo7020028 (2017).
pmcid: 5487999 doi: 10.3390/metabo7020028 pubmed: 5487999
MahmoudianDehkordi, S. et al. Altered bile acid profile associates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease–an emerging role for gut microbiome. Alzheimer’s Dement. 15, 76–92 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.217
Nho, K. et al. Altered bile acid profile in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to neuroimaging and CSF biomarkers. Alzheimer’s Dement. 15, 232–244 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.012
Jack, C. R., Jr. et al. in Alzheimer’s Association International Conference. 1–57 (Alzheimer’s Association).
Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. A/T/N: an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Neurology 87, 539–547 (2016).
pubmed: 27371494 pmcid: 4970664 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002923
Bennett, D. A. et al. Religious orders study and rush memory and aging project. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 64, S161–S189 (2018).
doi: 10.3233/JAD-179939
Sharma, S. & Black, S. M. Carnitine homeostasis, mitochondrial function, and cardiovascular disease. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Mech. 6, e31–e39 (2009).
pubmed: 20648231 pmcid: 2905823 doi: 10.1016/j.ddmec.2009.02.001
Lynch, C. J. & Adams, S. H. Branched-chain amino acids in metabolic signalling and insulin resistance. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 10, 723–736 (2014).
pubmed: 25287287 pmcid: 4424797 doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.171
Adeva-Andany, M. et al. Insulin resistance and glycine metabolism in humans. Amino Acids 50, 11–27 (2018).
pubmed: 29094215 doi: 10.1007/s00726-017-2508-0
Phang, J. M., Liu, W. & Zabirnyk, O. Proline metabolism and microenvironmental stress. Annu Rev. Nutr. 30, 441–463 (2010).
pubmed: 20415579 doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.012809.104638
Feng, R. N. et al. Histidine supplementation improves insulin resistance through suppressed inflammation in obese women with the metabolic syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 56, 985–994 (2013).
pubmed: 23361591 doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2839-7
Watanabe, M. et al. Consequences of low plasma histidine in chronic kidney disease patients: associations with inflammation, oxidative stress, and mortality. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 87, 1860–1866 (2008).
pubmed: 18541578 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1860
Huang, H. et al. Role of glutamine and interlinked asparagine metabolism in vessel formation. EMBO J. 36, 2334–2352 (2017).
pubmed: 28659375 pmcid: 5556263 doi: 10.15252/embj.201695518
Ruth, M. R. & Field, C. J. The immune modifying effects of amino acids on gut-associated lymphoid tissue. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 4, 27 (2013).
pubmed: 23899038 pmcid: 3750756 doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-27
Newgard, C. B. et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 9, 311–326 (2009).
pubmed: 19356713 pmcid: 3640280 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.002
Lacruz, M. E. et al. Instability of personal human metabotype is linked to all-cause mortality. Sci. Rep. 8, 9810 (2018).
pubmed: 29955084 pmcid: 6023858 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27958-1
Mapstone, M. et al. Plasma phospholipids identify antecedent memory impairment in older adults. Nat. Med. 20, 415–418 (2014).
pubmed: 24608097 pmcid: 5360460 doi: 10.1038/nm.3466
Casanova, R. et al. Blood metabolite markers of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease in two longitudinally followed cohorts of older individuals. Alzheimer’s Dement. 12, 815–822 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.12.008
Tapiola, T. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid {beta}-amyloid 42 and tau proteins as biomarkers of Alzheimer-type pathologic changes in the brain. Arch. Neurol. 66, 382–389 (2009).
pubmed: 19273758 doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2008.596
Weiner, M. W. et al. Impact of the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative, 2004 to 2014. Alzheimer’s Dement. 11, 865–884 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.005
St John-Williams, L. et al. Targeted metabolomics and medication classification data from participants in the ADNI1 cohort. Sci. Data 4, 170140 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.140
Hansson, O. et al. CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease concord with amyloid-beta PET and predict clinical progression: a study of fully automated immunoassays in BioFINDER and ADNI cohorts. Alzheimer’s Dement. 14, 1470–1481 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.010
Bittner, T. et al. Technical performance of a novel, fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitation of beta-amyloid (1–42) in human cerebrospinal fluid. Alzheimer’s Dement. 12, 517–526 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.09.009
Landau, S. M. et al. Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI. Neurobiol. Aging 32, 1207–1218 (2011).
pubmed: 19660834 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.07.002
Jagust, W. J. et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease neuroimaging initiative positron emission tomography core. Alzheimer’s Dement. 6, 221–229 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.003
Li, J. & Ji, L. Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity (Edinb.) 95, 221–227 (2005).
doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800717
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P. & Piquero, A. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36, 859–866 (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
Higgins, J. P. & Thompson, S. G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 21, 1539–1558 (2002).
pubmed: 12111919 doi: 10.1002/sim.1186

Auteurs

Matthias Arnold (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.

Kwangsik Nho (K)

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Alexandra Kueider-Paisley (A)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Tyler Massaro (T)

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Kevin Huynh (K)

Metabolomics Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Barbara Brauner (B)

Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.

Siamak MahmoudianDehkordi (S)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Gregory Louie (G)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

M Arthur Moseley (MA)

Duke Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

J Will Thompson (JW)

Duke Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Lisa St John-Williams (LS)

Duke Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Jessica D Tenenbaum (JD)

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Colette Blach (C)

Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Rui Chang (R)

Center for Innovation in Brain Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Roberta D Brinton (RD)

Center for Innovation in Brain Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Rebecca Baillie (R)

Rosa & Co LLC, San Carlos, CA, USA.

Xianlin Han (X)

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

John Q Trojanowski (JQ)

Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Leslie M Shaw (LM)

Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Ralph Martins (R)

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.

Michael W Weiner (MW)

Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Eugenia Trushina (E)

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Jon B Toledo (JB)

Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

Peter J Meikle (PJ)

Metabolomics Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

David A Bennett (DA)

Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Jan Krumsiek (J)

Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

P Murali Doraiswamy (PM)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Institute of Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Andrew J Saykin (AJ)

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Rima Kaddurah-Daouk (R)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. kaddu001@mc.duke.edu.
Duke Institute of Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. kaddu001@mc.duke.edu.
Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. kaddu001@mc.duke.edu.

Gabi Kastenmüller (G)

Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany. g.kastenmueller@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany. g.kastenmueller@helmholtz-muenchen.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH