The Use of Imaging for Synthetic Midurethral Slings.
magnetic resonance imaging
mesh
midurethral slings
tension-free vaginal tape
transobturator tape
ultrasound
Journal
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
ISSN: 1550-9613
Titre abrégé: J Ultrasound Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8211547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
05
08
2019
revised:
29
01
2020
accepted:
03
02
2020
pubmed:
4
3
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
4
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging can be used to image midurethral slings, which have may have complications such as pain. There is considerable misunderstanding regarding the utility of the different modalities. This article aims to review the current literature to identify the benefits and limitations of each imaging modality and identify the place that each should have for patients with midurethral sling complications. A literature search was performed, and all relevant articles were identified and reviewed. Different imaging modalities are complementary, but more research is required in this area.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1497-1506Informations de copyright
© 2020 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Références
Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, et al. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997-2016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017; 11:629-640.
Harding C, Thorpe A. Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Urol 2008; 15:27-34.
Jha S, Hillard T, Monga A, Duckett J. National BSUG audit of stress urinary incontinence surgery in England. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:1337-1341.
Gurol-Urganci I, Geary RS, Mamza JB, et al. Long-term rate of mesh sling removal following midurethral mesh sling insertion among women with stress urinary incontinence. JAMA 2018; 320:1-11.
Keltie K, Elneil S, Monga A, et al. Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8-year study of 92,246 women. Sci Rep 2017; 7:12015.
Shek KL, Dietz HP. Imaging of slings and meshes. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2014; 17:61-71.
Dietz H, Barry C, Lim Y, Rane A. 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound in the evaluation of suburethral sling implants [abstract]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24(suppl):253.
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM/IUGA practice parameter for the performance of urogynecologic ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38:851-864.
Schaer G, Koelbl H, Voigh R, et al. Recommendation of the German Association of Urogynecology on functional sonography of the lower female urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J 1996; 7:105-108.
Long CY, Hsu CS, Lo TS, Liu CM, Chen YH, Tsai EM. Ultrasonographic assessment of tape location following tension-free vaginal tape and transbturator tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87:116-121.
Dietz HP, Wilson PD. Anatomical assessment of the bladder outlet and proximal urethra using ultrasound and vidocystourethrography. Int Urogynecol J 1998; 9:365-369.
Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implication for function and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22:493-498.
Schuettoff SA, Beyersdorff D, Gauruder-Burmester A, Tunn R. Visibility of the polypropylene tape after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence: comparison of introital ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and in vivo. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27:687-692.
Shen JK, Faaborg D, Rouse G, et al. Applying translabial ultrasound to detect synthetic slings: you can do it too! A comparison of urology trainees to an attending radiologist. Neurourol Urodyn 2017; 36:1763-1769.
Lin KL, Juan YS, Lo TS, Liu CM, Tasai EM, Long CY. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of compression effect on urethra following tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:452-457.
Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz HP, et al. State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37:381-396.
Taithongchai A, Sultan AH, Wieczorek PA, Thakar R. Clinical applications of 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound of mid-urethral slings and vaginal wall mesh. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:1401-1411.
Denson L, Shobeiri SA. Three-dimensional endovaginal sonography of synthetic implanted materials in the female pelvic floor. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33:521-529.
Kociszewski J, Rautenber O, Peruchhini D, et al. Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 2008; 27:485-490.
Ward KL, Hilton P. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:324-331.
Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Dynamic assessment of sling function on transperineal ultrasound: does it correlate with outcomes 1 year following surgery? Int Urogynecol J 2017; 28:857-864.
Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. How important is TVT location? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83:904-908.
Rechberger T, Bogusiewicz M, Monist M, Futyma K, Stankiewicz A, Wieczork A. Tape position in patients with recurrent urinary incontinence after failed suburethral slings. Paper presented at: 2010 Meeting of International Continence Society and International Urogynecological Association; August 23-27, 2010; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. Does the TVT stay where you put it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188:950-953.
Ng CC, Lee LC, Han WH. Use of three-dimensional ultrasound scan to assess the clinical importance of midurethral placement of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for treatment of incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005; 16:220-225.
Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kuszka A, Eberhard J, Hilgers R, Viereck V. Can we place tension-free vaginal tape where it should be? The one-third rule. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:210-214.
Chan L, Tse V. Pelvic floor ultrasound in the diagnosis of sling complications. World J Urol 2018; 36:753-759.
Duckett J, Basu M, Papanikolaou N. Transperienal ultrasound to assess the effect of tension-free vaginal tape position on flow rates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:379-383.
Bogusiewicz M, Monist M, Stankiewicz A, Wozniak M, Wieczorek A, Rechberger T. Most of the patients with suburethral sling failure have tapes located outside the high-pressure zone of the urethra. Ginekol Pol 2013; 84:334-338.
Wang F, Song Y, Huang H. Which placement of the tension-free vaginal tape is more important for urinary continence: midurethral position or bladder neck? Consideration from a case report. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20:1277-1279.
Yang J, Yang S, Huang W, Tzeng CR. Correlation of tape location and tension with surgical outcome after transobturator suburethral tape procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:458-465.
Rautenberg O, Kociszewski J, Welter J, Kuszka A, Eberhard J, Viereck V. Ultrasound and early tape mobilization: a practical solution for treating postoperative voiding dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2014; 33:1147-1151.
Manonai J, Rostaminia G, Denson L, Shobeiri SA. Clinical and ultrasonographic study of patients presenting with transvaginal mesh complications. Neurourol Urodyn 2016; 25:407-411.
Staack A, Vitale J, Ragavendra N, Rodriguez LV. Translabial ultrasonography for evaluation of synthetic mesh in the vagina. Urology 2014; 83:68-74.
Viragh KA, Cohen SA, Shen L, Kurzbard-Roach N, Raz S, Raman SS. Translabial ultrasound: preoperative detection of midurethral sling erosion in stress urinary incontinence. Radiology 2018; 289:721-727.
Rogowski A, Bienkowski P, Tosiak A, Jerzak M, Mierzejewski P, Baranowski W. Mesh retraction correlates with vaginal pain and overactive bladder symptoms after anterior vaginal mesh repair. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24:2087-2092.
Svabik K, Martan A, Masata J, El-Haddad R, Hubka P, Pavlikova M. Ultrasound appearances after mesh implantation: evidence of mesh contraction or folding? Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22:529-533.
Mukati M, Abbas S. Transvaginal sling release with intraoperative ultrasound guidance. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013; 19:184-185.
Khatri G, Carmel ME, Bailey AA, et al. Postoperative imaging after surgical repair for pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics 2016; 36:1233-1256.
Ram R, Oliphant SS, Barr SA, Pandey T. Imaging of pelvic floor reconstruction. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2017; 38:200-212.
Juliato CRT, Santos-Junior LC, de Castro EB, Dertkigil SS, Brito LGO. Vaginal axis after abdominal sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation: a randomized trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38:1142-1151.
Ginath S, Garely AD, Luchs JS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal versus vaginal prolapse surgery with mesh. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23:1569-1576.
Rinne K, Kainulainen S, Aukee S, Heinonen S, Nilsson CG. Dynamic MRI confirms support of the mid-urethra by TVT and TVT-O surgery for stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90:629-635.
Alt CD, Brocker KA, Lenz F, Sohn C, Kauczor HU, Hallscheidt P. MRI findings before and after prolapse surgery. Acta Radiol 2014; 55:495-504.
Alt CD, Benner L, Mokry T, et al. Five-year outcome after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: evaluation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging compared to clinical examination and quality-of-life questionnaire. Acta Radiol 2018; 59:1264-1273.
Lichy MP, Wietek BM, Mugler JP III, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab,3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences. Invest Radiol 2005; 40:754-760.
Iva U, Nikhil S, Geertje C, et al. In vivo documentation of shape and position changes of MRI-visible mesh placed in rectovaginal septum. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017; 75:379-389.
Němec M, Horčička L, Dibonová M, et al. MRI analysis of the musculo-fascial component of pelvic floor in woman before planned vaginal reconstruction procedure for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse [in Czech]. Ceska Gynekol 2018; 83:84-93.
Brocker KA, Lippus F, Alt CD, et al. Magnetic resonance-visible polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015; 79:101-106.
Chen L, Lenz F, Alt CD, Sohn C, De Lancey JO, Brocker KA. MRI visible Fe3O4 polypropylene mesh: 3D reconstruction of spatial relation to bony pelvis and neurovascular structures. Int Urogynecol J 2017; 28:1131-1138.
Sindhwani N, Feola A, De Keyzer F, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of implanted magnetic-resonance-visible meshes. Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26:1459-1465.
Sahnan K, Adegbola SO, Tozer PJ, et al. Innovation in the imaging perianal fistula: a step towards personalised medicine. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018; 11:1756284818775060.