Police accuracy in truth/lie detection when judging baseline interviews.
baseline interviewing
comparable truth baseline
credibility assessment
deception detection
interrogation
interviewing techniques
police officers’ accuracy
Journal
Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
ISSN: 1321-8719
Titre abrégé: Psychiatr Psychol Law
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9433511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
5
3
2020
pubmed:
5
3
2020
medline:
5
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research has shown that a comparable truth baseline (CTB) approach elicits more cues to deception and results in higher accuracy rates than a small talk baseline. Past research focused on laypeople's accuracy rates. We examined whether the CTB also has a positive effect on law enforcement personnel accuracy. In this study, 95 police officers judged 10 interviews, whereby half of the senders told the truth, and the other half lied about a mock undercover mission. Half of the interviews included only questioning about the event under investigation, whereas the other half also included questioning aimed at creating a CTB. Total and truth accuracy did not differ, but observers who watched interviews with a CTB obtained higher lie detection accuracy rates than those who watched interviews without the baseline questioning. Signal detection analyses showed that this effect could be attributed to a decreased response bias in the CTB condition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32128012
doi: 10.1080/13218719.2019.1642258
pii: 1642258
pmc: PMC7033705
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
841-850Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
Références
Span J Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;21:E49
pubmed: 30419998
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):214-34
pubmed: 16859438
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:295-317
pubmed: 30609913
Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):74-118
pubmed: 12555795
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Feb;31(1):137-49
pubmed: 10495845
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2019 Feb 6;26(4):571-579
pubmed: 31984097
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 17;8:1154
pubmed: 28769829