Patient Reported Experience in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
emergency medicine
patient experience
pediatric
quality improvement
Journal
Journal of patient experience
ISSN: 2374-3735
Titre abrégé: J Patient Exp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101688338
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez:
5
3
2020
pubmed:
5
3
2020
medline:
5
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe patient-reported experience in a pediatric emergency department (ED) and determine: (1) whether there are differences between the experience children report in comparison to their parents; and (2) whether factors such as time of visit (day, evening, night) and ED census are associated with patient experience. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey of children ≥8 years of age and the parents/guardians of children 0 to 17 years who visited a pediatric ED using a validated patient experience measure. The proportion of respondents for each question indicating that an aspect of their care could have been improved was calculated as problem scores for each survey item. The primary outcome was the overall problem scores for all respondents combined and for children and parents separately. A total of 237 parents and 109 children completed surveys. The areas with the highest problem scores identified by both parents and children were: having enough to do while waiting to be seen (53.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48.1, 58.8) and when to restart usual activities (34.7; 95% CI: 29.7, 40.0). There were meaningful differences in problem scores between children and parents including: doctors and nurses explaining what they were doing (parents: 19; 95% CI: 14.3, 24.7, child 40.4; 95% CI: 31.2, 50.2) and privacy when examined and treated (parents: 17.3; 95% CI: 12.8, 22.9, child: 36.7; 95% CI: 27.8, 46.5). There are differences in reported experience between children and their parents. This highlights the importance of including children when assessing patient experience in a pediatric setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32128380
doi: 10.1177/2374373519826560
pii: 10.1177_2374373519826560
pmc: PMC7036683
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
116-123Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):695-709
pubmed: 10905652
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1016-21
pubmed: 22068060
Healthc Policy. 2007 May;2(4):e164-77
pubmed: 19305726
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;15(9):825-31
pubmed: 19244633
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):643-56
pubmed: 25996053
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Apr;26(2):177-82
pubmed: 24708008
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:535-9
pubmed: 27332258
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;62(4):340-50
pubmed: 23787210
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 03;3(1):
pubmed: 23293244
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):417-9
pubmed: 18573954
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;9(12):1379-88
pubmed: 12460841
Emerg Med J. 2014 Apr;31(4):262
pubmed: 23851035
Clin J Pain. 1998 Dec;14(4):336-42
pubmed: 9874013
J Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):13-26
pubmed: 14751474
Emerg Med J. 2010 Mar;27(3):221-3
pubmed: 20304894
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Sep;176(9):1263-1267
pubmed: 28669089
J Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;25(3):329-33
pubmed: 14585467
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Apr;26(4):257-73
pubmed: 20401971
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jul;28(7):633-9
pubmed: 22743752
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Feb 20;14:8
pubmed: 23421603