Implementing a Competency-Based Approach to Anatomy Teaching: Beginning With the End in Mind.

anatomy competency-based medical education entrustable professional activities flipped classroom team-based learning

Journal

Journal of medical education and curricular development
ISSN: 2382-1205
Titre abrégé: J Med Educ Curric Dev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101690298

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 10 01 2020
accepted: 29 01 2020
entrez: 5 3 2020
pubmed: 5 3 2020
medline: 5 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The shift in the medical education system from a time-based to a competency-based model has encouraged its adoption and application in competency-based education in anatomy classrooms, such as team-based learning models and flipped classroom models. This pilot study aimed to build on previous work of the linkages between anatomy-based learning (a flipped classroom model inspired by a modified team-based learning) and student learning and engagement, and further to assess the linkage between anatomy-based learning and academic performance. A sequential mixed-methods design was employed to first gather and analyse quantitative data, including confidential student first semester scores in anatomy: gender, stream, anatomy-based learning, and final anatomy overall mark. The quantitative phase was followed by a qualitative phase in which a series of 8 anatomy laboratories were observed (4 anatomy-based learning and 4 traditional). Thematic analysis was performed on the observation data. Aggregate anatomy-based learning and traditional stream tests, and final unit scores were compared. The anatomy-based learning and final unit scores showed little difference between students in the anatomy-based learning and students in the traditional stream. Students using anatomy-based learning had an aggregate score of 1.15 and final aggregate mark of 72, whereas students in the traditional section had an aggregate score of 1.19 and final mark of 79. Qualitative phase was undertaken to try to assess the linkages between anatomy-based learning and student learning. Observations showed that students in the anatomy-based learning section spent more time on task as compared with their peers in the traditional stream. The anatomy-based learning students also seemed to practice more self-directed learning and employed more multimodal learning strategies than the traditional section stream. Although the quantitative results of this study showed no significant difference in mean scores between anatomy-based learning and traditional designs, it was possible to observe the potential of flipped classroom model in engaging students in individual preparation, in team-based learning, and in consensus-based learning approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The shift in the medical education system from a time-based to a competency-based model has encouraged its adoption and application in competency-based education in anatomy classrooms, such as team-based learning models and flipped classroom models. This pilot study aimed to build on previous work of the linkages between anatomy-based learning (a flipped classroom model inspired by a modified team-based learning) and student learning and engagement, and further to assess the linkage between anatomy-based learning and academic performance.
METHODS METHODS
A sequential mixed-methods design was employed to first gather and analyse quantitative data, including confidential student first semester scores in anatomy: gender, stream, anatomy-based learning, and final anatomy overall mark. The quantitative phase was followed by a qualitative phase in which a series of 8 anatomy laboratories were observed (4 anatomy-based learning and 4 traditional). Thematic analysis was performed on the observation data.
RESULTS RESULTS
Aggregate anatomy-based learning and traditional stream tests, and final unit scores were compared. The anatomy-based learning and final unit scores showed little difference between students in the anatomy-based learning and students in the traditional stream. Students using anatomy-based learning had an aggregate score of 1.15 and final aggregate mark of 72, whereas students in the traditional section had an aggregate score of 1.19 and final mark of 79. Qualitative phase was undertaken to try to assess the linkages between anatomy-based learning and student learning. Observations showed that students in the anatomy-based learning section spent more time on task as compared with their peers in the traditional stream. The anatomy-based learning students also seemed to practice more self-directed learning and employed more multimodal learning strategies than the traditional section stream.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although the quantitative results of this study showed no significant difference in mean scores between anatomy-based learning and traditional designs, it was possible to observe the potential of flipped classroom model in engaging students in individual preparation, in team-based learning, and in consensus-based learning approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32128447
doi: 10.1177/2382120520907899
pii: 10.1177_2382120520907899
pmc: PMC7031789
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2382120520907899

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):413-20
pubmed: 25227111
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug;12(3):336-43
pubmed: 22912927
Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1739-45
pubmed: 20881827
Med Teach. 2009 Nov;31(11):1013-7
pubmed: 19909042
Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008 Dec;37(12):1019-23
pubmed: 19159035
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):6-7
pubmed: 24404218
Clin Anat. 2005 Jan;18(1):56-63
pubmed: 15597377
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(3):231-6
pubmed: 23848330
Med Teach. 2010;32(2):118-22
pubmed: 20163226
Med Teach. 2009 Sep;31(9):855-61
pubmed: 19811192
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):549-559
pubmed: 28419750

Auteurs

Alireza Jalali (A)

Division of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Dahn Jeong (D)

Department of Innovation in Medical Education, Office of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Stephanie Sutherland (S)

Department of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH