Influence of the use of autogenous bone particles to close the access window after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: an experimental study in rabbits.
Autogenous bone
Collagen membrane
Osteoconductivity
Sinus floor elevation
Xenograft
Journal
International journal of implant dentistry
ISSN: 2198-4034
Titre abrégé: Int J Implant Dent
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101676532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Mar 2020
04 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
20
10
2019
accepted:
21
01
2020
entrez:
5
3
2020
pubmed:
5
3
2020
medline:
5
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To study the influence on the healing of the placement of particulate autogenous bone in the antrostomy and in the subjacent region after maxillary sinus elevation. Sixteen New Zealand rabbits were undergone to bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 4 × 4 mm antrostomy dimension. The sinus mucosa was elevated, and the space obtained was filled with xenograft. In the test site (treated sites), autogenous bone was harvested from the tibia and was placed either in the antrostomy and the subjacent region while the control site was left untreated. Antrostomy was covered bilaterally with collagen membranes. Animals were euthanized after 1 and 8 weeks of healing, with 8 rabbits in each group. Histomorphometric evaluations were done. The Wilcoxon test is used for statistical analysis, for a 5% statistical significance. After 1 week of healing, the new bone proportion in the antrostomy was 7.7 ± 11.2% and 6.1 ± 6.4% in the treated and untreated sites, respectively. In the subjacent region (close-to-window region), hardly any new bone was assessed. In the elevated region, 2.7-2.8% of total new bone was found in both sites. In the antrostomy region, after 8 weeks of healing, 35.5 ± 20.9% of new bone in the treated sites, and 28.6 ± 24.1% in the untreated sites was observed (p = 0.499). In the close-to-window region, the respective proportions were 25.8 ± 16.1% and 17.6 ± 16.3% (p = 0.018). In the elevated region, the total new bone reached fractions of 27.9 ± 12.9% and 23.6 ± 15.2% in the treated and untreated sites, respectively (p = 0.128). The placement of autogenous bone in the antrostomy and the subjacent region after maxillary sinus elevation, slightly enhanced bone formation compared with sites only grafted with xenograft. Though, only the subjacent close-to-window region showed a statistical significance at 8 weeks of healing. Despite the limitations of the present study, due to its preclinical nature, findings should be extrapolated to humans with caution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32128632
doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-0206-2
pii: 10.1186/s40729-020-0206-2
pmc: PMC7054469
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9Références
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Feb 15;34(4):819–827
pubmed: 30768660
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):233-40
pubmed: 25712609
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Aug;102(2):291-9
pubmed: 9703062
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Feb;29(2):192-201
pubmed: 29071736
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Dec 5;34(1):223–232
pubmed: 30521653
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Dec;25(6):551-9
pubmed: 16353530
Implant Dent. 2010 Jun;19(3):259-70
pubmed: 20523182
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1454-1461
pubmed: 26754150
Implant Dent. 2019 Dec;28(6):537-542
pubmed: 31425319
J Investig Clin Dent. 2018 Nov;9(4):e12362
pubmed: 30144303
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):607-18
pubmed: 25671628
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983 Dec;72(6):778-85
pubmed: 6196801
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan;49(1):107-120
pubmed: 31230768
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):821-834
pubmed: 29876969
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;41(3):235-41
pubmed: 23084768
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Oct;13(5):514-21
pubmed: 12453129
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):548-55
pubmed: 12969358
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1043-51
pubmed: 24164570
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Apr;20(2):117-25
pubmed: 11203554
J Oral Surg. 1980 Aug;38(8):613-6
pubmed: 6993637
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1200-1212
pubmed: 21906186
Implant Dent. 2014 Feb;23(1):29-36
pubmed: 24445918
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):120-32
pubmed: 23656352
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(3):165-73
pubmed: 15726851
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):698-705
pubmed: 22487091
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40
pubmed: 18724852