Implementation Effectiveness of a Parent-Directed YouTube Video ("It Doesn't Have To Hurt") on Evidence-Based Strategies to Manage Needle Pain: Descriptive Survey Study.
child
knowledge translation
pain management
social media
Journal
JMIR pediatrics and parenting
ISSN: 2561-6722
Titre abrégé: JMIR Pediatr Parent
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101727244
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Mar 2020
04 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
30
01
2019
accepted:
20
09
2019
revised:
07
05
2019
entrez:
5
3
2020
pubmed:
5
3
2020
medline:
5
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the availability of high-quality evidence and clinical practice guidelines for the effective management of pediatric pain, this evidence is rarely used in practice for managing children's pain from needle procedures such as vaccinations. Parents are generally unaware of pain management strategies they can use with their children. This study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate the implementation effectiveness of a parent-directed YouTube video on evidence-based strategies to manage needle pain in children. This was a descriptive study. Analytics were extracted from YouTube to describe video reach. A Web-based survey was used to seek parent and health care professional (HCP) feedback about the video. The 2-minute 18-second video was launched on YouTube on November 4, 2013. In the video, a 4-year-old girl tells parents what they should and should not do to help needles hurt less. The key evidence-based messages shared in the video were distraction, deep breathing, and topical anesthetic creams. A group of parents (n=163) and HCPs (n=278) completed the Web-based survey. Measures of reach included number of unique views, country where the video was viewed, sex of the viewer, and length of watch time. The Web-based survey assessed implementation outcomes of the video, such as acceptability, appropriateness, penetration, and adoption. As of November 4, 2018 (5 years after launch), the video had 237,132 unique views from 182 countries, with most viewers watching an average of 55.1% (76/138 seconds) of the video. Overall, both parents and HCPs reported strong acceptance of the video (ie, they liked the video, found it helpful, and felt more confident) and reported significant improvements in plans to use distraction, deep breathing, and topical anesthetic creams. This parent-directed YouTube video was an acceptable and appropriate way to disseminate evidence about the procedure of pain management to a large number of parents.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the availability of high-quality evidence and clinical practice guidelines for the effective management of pediatric pain, this evidence is rarely used in practice for managing children's pain from needle procedures such as vaccinations. Parents are generally unaware of pain management strategies they can use with their children.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate the implementation effectiveness of a parent-directed YouTube video on evidence-based strategies to manage needle pain in children.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a descriptive study. Analytics were extracted from YouTube to describe video reach. A Web-based survey was used to seek parent and health care professional (HCP) feedback about the video. The 2-minute 18-second video was launched on YouTube on November 4, 2013. In the video, a 4-year-old girl tells parents what they should and should not do to help needles hurt less. The key evidence-based messages shared in the video were distraction, deep breathing, and topical anesthetic creams. A group of parents (n=163) and HCPs (n=278) completed the Web-based survey. Measures of reach included number of unique views, country where the video was viewed, sex of the viewer, and length of watch time. The Web-based survey assessed implementation outcomes of the video, such as acceptability, appropriateness, penetration, and adoption.
RESULTS
RESULTS
As of November 4, 2018 (5 years after launch), the video had 237,132 unique views from 182 countries, with most viewers watching an average of 55.1% (76/138 seconds) of the video. Overall, both parents and HCPs reported strong acceptance of the video (ie, they liked the video, found it helpful, and felt more confident) and reported significant improvements in plans to use distraction, deep breathing, and topical anesthetic creams.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This parent-directed YouTube video was an acceptable and appropriate way to disseminate evidence about the procedure of pain management to a large number of parents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32130190
pii: v3i1e13552
doi: 10.2196/13552
pmc: PMC7081136
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13552Informations de copyright
©Christine T Chambers, Justine Dol, Jennifer A Parker, Line Caes, Kathryn A Birnie, Anna Taddio, Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Scott A Halperin, Jennifer Langille. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (http://pediatrics.jmir.org), 04.03.2020.
Références
BMJ Open. 2013 May 09;3(5):
pubmed: 23667163
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Feb;42(2):305-12
pubmed: 17270540
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Jan;50(1):50-6
pubmed: 20837618
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2014 Jun 1;3(2):59-65
pubmed: 24940529
Can J Nurs Res. 2009 Dec;41(4):109-14
pubmed: 20191718
Health Informatics J. 2015 Sep;21(3):173-94
pubmed: 24670899
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 3;11(10):e0164123
pubmed: 27695054
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S104-51
pubmed: 19781433
Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Jul;29(7):729-33
pubmed: 23615872
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S77-S103
pubmed: 19781437
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2018 Dec 11;1(2):e11193
pubmed: 31518292
Adv Neonatal Care. 2017 Oct;17(5):372-380
pubmed: 28885227
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S152-67
pubmed: 19781434
Pain Res Manag. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):e129-41
pubmed: 24308029
J Pain. 2012 Sep;13(9):857-65
pubmed: 22958873
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Oct/Dec;31(4):341-349
pubmed: 28520656
Clin J Pain. 2015 Jun;31(6):591-8
pubmed: 25551476
Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 04;10:155
pubmed: 26537706
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E843-55
pubmed: 21098062
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018 Jun;57(6):672-688
pubmed: 28959897
Lancet. 1997 Mar 1;349(9052):599-603
pubmed: 9057731
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 04;10:CD005179
pubmed: 30284240
Health Informatics J. 2019 Dec;25(4):1265-1277
pubmed: 29361867
Pain Res Manag. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):198-204
pubmed: 24809068
Lancet. 1987 Jan 31;1(8527):243-8
pubmed: 20928962
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85
pubmed: 23615206
Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Feb;39(3):344-52
pubmed: 24494675
Health Informatics J. 2008 Dec;14(4):323-34
pubmed: 19008281
Pain. 2018 Sep;159 Suppl 1:S56-S64
pubmed: 30113948
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 25;9:120
pubmed: 25928349
Clin J Pain. 2016 Nov;32(11):972-990
pubmed: 26710219
CMAJ. 2011 Apr 19;183(7):E403-10
pubmed: 21464171
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 29;11:26
pubmed: 26923462
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Sep 1;90(1):231-7
pubmed: 24986747
Brain. 2012 Feb;135(Pt 2):404-17
pubmed: 22102650
J Pain Res. 2016 Sep 22;9:701-709
pubmed: 27703395
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Apr 1;43(3):224-233
pubmed: 29145589
BMC Pediatr. 2014 May 29;14:134
pubmed: 24885559