Association of combination statin and antihypertensive therapy with reduced Alzheimer's disease and related dementia risk.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 12 09 2019
accepted: 08 02 2020
entrez: 5 3 2020
pubmed: 5 3 2020
medline: 19 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hyperlipidemia and hypertension are modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Approximately 25% of adults over age 65 use both antihypertensives (AHTs) and statins for these conditions. While a growing body of evidence found statins and AHTs are independently associated with lower ADRD risk, no evidence exists on simultaneous use for different drug class combinations and ADRD risk. Our primary objective was to compare ADRD risk associated with concurrent use of different combinations of statins and antihypertensives. In a retrospective cohort study (2007-2014), we analyzed 694,672 Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (2,017,786 person-years) who concurrently used both statins and AHTs. Using logistic regression adjusting for age, socioeconomic status and comorbidities, we quantified incident ADRD diagnosis associated with concurrent use of different statin molecules (atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin) and AHT drug classes (two renin-angiotensin system (RAS)-acting AHTs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs), vs non-RAS-acting AHTs). Pravastatin or rosuvastatin combined with RAS-acting AHTs reduce risk of ADRD relative to any statin combined with non-RAS-acting AHTs: ACEI+pravastatin odds ratio (OR) = 0.942 (CI: 0.899-0.986, p = 0.011), ACEI+rosuvastatin OR = 0.841 (CI: 0.794-0.892, p<0.001), ARB+pravastatin OR = 0.794 (CI: 0.748-0.843, p<0.001), ARB+rosuvastatin OR = 0.818 (CI: 0.765-0.874, p<0.001). ARBs combined with atorvastatin and simvastatin are associated with smaller reductions in risk, and ACEI with no risk reduction, compared to when combined with pravastatin or rosuvastatin. Among Hispanics, no combination of statins and RAS-acting AHTs reduces risk relative to combinations of statins and non-RAS-acting AHTs. Among blacks using ACEI+rosuvastatin, ADRD odds were 33% lower compared to blacks using other statins combined with non-RAS-acting AHTs (OR = 0.672 (CI: 0.548-0.825, p<0.001)). Among older Americans, use of pravastatin and rosuvastatin to treat hyperlipidemia is less common than use of simvastatin and atorvastatin, however, in combination with RAS-acting AHTs, particularly ARBs, they may be more effective at reducing risk of ADRD. The number of Americans with ADRD may be reduced with drug treatments for vascular health that also confer effects on ADRD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hyperlipidemia and hypertension are modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Approximately 25% of adults over age 65 use both antihypertensives (AHTs) and statins for these conditions. While a growing body of evidence found statins and AHTs are independently associated with lower ADRD risk, no evidence exists on simultaneous use for different drug class combinations and ADRD risk. Our primary objective was to compare ADRD risk associated with concurrent use of different combinations of statins and antihypertensives.
METHODS
In a retrospective cohort study (2007-2014), we analyzed 694,672 Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (2,017,786 person-years) who concurrently used both statins and AHTs. Using logistic regression adjusting for age, socioeconomic status and comorbidities, we quantified incident ADRD diagnosis associated with concurrent use of different statin molecules (atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin) and AHT drug classes (two renin-angiotensin system (RAS)-acting AHTs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs), vs non-RAS-acting AHTs).
FINDINGS
Pravastatin or rosuvastatin combined with RAS-acting AHTs reduce risk of ADRD relative to any statin combined with non-RAS-acting AHTs: ACEI+pravastatin odds ratio (OR) = 0.942 (CI: 0.899-0.986, p = 0.011), ACEI+rosuvastatin OR = 0.841 (CI: 0.794-0.892, p<0.001), ARB+pravastatin OR = 0.794 (CI: 0.748-0.843, p<0.001), ARB+rosuvastatin OR = 0.818 (CI: 0.765-0.874, p<0.001). ARBs combined with atorvastatin and simvastatin are associated with smaller reductions in risk, and ACEI with no risk reduction, compared to when combined with pravastatin or rosuvastatin. Among Hispanics, no combination of statins and RAS-acting AHTs reduces risk relative to combinations of statins and non-RAS-acting AHTs. Among blacks using ACEI+rosuvastatin, ADRD odds were 33% lower compared to blacks using other statins combined with non-RAS-acting AHTs (OR = 0.672 (CI: 0.548-0.825, p<0.001)).
CONCLUSION
Among older Americans, use of pravastatin and rosuvastatin to treat hyperlipidemia is less common than use of simvastatin and atorvastatin, however, in combination with RAS-acting AHTs, particularly ARBs, they may be more effective at reducing risk of ADRD. The number of Americans with ADRD may be reduced with drug treatments for vascular health that also confer effects on ADRD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32130251
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229541
pii: PONE-D-19-25705
pmc: PMC7055882
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists 0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors 0
Antihypertensive Agents 0
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors 0
Hypolipidemic Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0229541

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG066203
Pays : United States
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R34 AG049652
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG055401
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AG042498
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG026572
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL130462
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_13088
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG043073
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL126804
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Partial financial support for this research was provided by Amgen. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The company had no role in any stage of the research process. The concept, design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, manuscript drafting, and revisions, were completed without any involvement from the company.

Références

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Apr 16;73(suppl_1):S38-S47
pubmed: 29669100
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Apr;6(4):373-8
pubmed: 17362841
Drug Metab Dispos. 1999 Feb;27(2):173-9
pubmed: 9929499
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011 Nov;70(11):944-59
pubmed: 22002425
Am J Med. 2001 Oct 1;111(5):390-400
pubmed: 11583643
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):688-97
pubmed: 24247674
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2014 Nov;18(1):25-39
pubmed: 27134606
Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):797-805
pubmed: 27474376
CNS Drugs. 2015 Feb;29(2):113-30
pubmed: 25700645
BMJ. 2010 Jan 12;340:b5465
pubmed: 20068258
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Aug 15;283(1-2):230-4
pubmed: 19321181
Neurology. 2007 Aug 28;69(9):878-85
pubmed: 17724290
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2012 Mar;8(3):371-82
pubmed: 22288606
JAMA. 2019 Aug 13;322(6):524-534
pubmed: 31408137
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Jan 15;10(1):4
pubmed: 29370871
J Mol Neurosci. 2002 Aug-Oct;19(1-2):155-61
pubmed: 12212773
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2163-2172
pubmed: 30428276
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Feb;61(2):194-201
pubmed: 23350899
JAMA Neurol. 2019 May 20;:
pubmed: 31107515
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206705
pubmed: 30383807
BMC Med. 2007 Jul 19;5:20
pubmed: 17640385
Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1627-31
pubmed: 11089820
JAMA. 2019 Jul 14;:
pubmed: 31302669
Neurol Genet. 2018 Jan 30;4(1):e216
pubmed: 29473050
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Sep;63(9):1749-56
pubmed: 26389987
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 20;10:245
pubmed: 20727154
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;80(1):13-7
pubmed: 18931004
Neurology. 2017 Sep 19;89(12):1251-1255
pubmed: 28821686
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jul;58(7):1311-7
pubmed: 20533968
Arch Neurol. 2012 Dec;69(12):1632-8
pubmed: 22964777
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Nov 25;8(1):50
pubmed: 27884212
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(47):e2143
pubmed: 26632742
Neurobiol Dis. 2001 Oct;8(5):890-9
pubmed: 11592856
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Jun;1862(6):1084-92
pubmed: 26957286
J Hypertens. 2013 Jun;31(6):1073-82
pubmed: 23552124
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;34(2):181-93
pubmed: 17973905
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2673-2734
pubmed: 28735855
Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):886-92
pubmed: 15313959
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Aug;7(8):683-9
pubmed: 18614402
J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Sep;42(9):963-70
pubmed: 12211221
Pharmacogenomics J. 2011 Aug;11(4):274-86
pubmed: 20386561
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(3):1443-1466
pubmed: 29562545
Trends Neurosci. 2009 Dec;32(12):619-28
pubmed: 19796831
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(1):153-161
pubmed: 31177216
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jan 15;97(2):229-35
pubmed: 16442368
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb;71(2):195-200
pubmed: 24378418
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Feb 17;9(1):10
pubmed: 28212683
Arch Neurol. 2011 Nov;68(11):1385-92
pubmed: 22084122
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2012;6:17-33
pubmed: 22442638
Am J Transl Res. 2009 Jan 18;1(2):163-77
pubmed: 19956428
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011 May;8(3):303-12
pubmed: 21244352
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2009 Mar;8(1):16-30
pubmed: 19275634
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Oct 05;4:510-520
pubmed: 30364652
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):225-232
pubmed: 27942728
Transl Neurodegener. 2018 Feb 27;7:5
pubmed: 29507718

Auteurs

Douglas Barthold (D)

Department of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Geoffrey Joyce (G)

School of Pharmacy, Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Roberta Diaz Brinton (R)

Center for Innovation in Brain Science, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tuscon, AZ, United States of America.

Whitney Wharton (W)

School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Patrick Gavin Kehoe (PG)

Bristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Julie Zissimopoulos (J)

Price School of Public Policy, Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH