[Traditional vs. modern: possibilities and limitations of the new lecture concept in ENT teaching curricula].
Tradition vs. Moderne: Möglichkeiten und Limitationen eines neuen Vorlesungskonzepts in der curricularen HNO-Lehre.
Educational measurement
Professional education
Research
Teaching methods
Undergraduate medical education
Journal
HNO
ISSN: 1433-0458
Titre abrégé: HNO
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 2985099R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
3
2020
medline:
15
7
2020
entrez:
5
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Due to steadily dwindling student attendance, a new blended learning lecture format was piloted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the University Medical Center Freiburg in the winter semester (WS) 2017/18: the ENT 3D series. In order to present complex ENT topics (e.g., middle ear) in a more understandable, appealing, and clinically relevant manner, the clinical disciplines of otorhinolaryngology and radiology cooperated with the preclinical specialty of anatomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate this teaching format and investigate preferences that could encourage students to attend lectures. In all lectures, participants of the ENT block internship in the 2017/18 WS were asked about the quality of the lecture using an evaluation card. In addition, the increase in knowledge was examined in each of the newly designed lectures. A final questionnaire asked the students about their preferences regarding teaching methods. Overall, the new courses were not rated better than the regular ones, although the new concept was generally rated positively. It was not possible to attract more lecture attendees. However, the traditional teaching format "lecture" is still regarded as up to date by a defined group of students. Despite a principally positive student assessment of a new lecture format, the 3D lectures did not achieve top marks in any category. This can be explained by the accumulation of unexpected student criticisms (quantity of the course content). Thus, the parameters intended as indicators (e-learning, quality of the course, use of modern teaching methods) could not fulfil their task. The result of the evaluation requires critical reflection and, if necessary, partial reorganization of the course (streamlining of content).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Due to steadily dwindling student attendance, a new blended learning lecture format was piloted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the University Medical Center Freiburg in the winter semester (WS) 2017/18: the ENT 3D series. In order to present complex ENT topics (e.g., middle ear) in a more understandable, appealing, and clinically relevant manner, the clinical disciplines of otorhinolaryngology and radiology cooperated with the preclinical specialty of anatomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate this teaching format and investigate preferences that could encourage students to attend lectures.
METHODS
METHODS
In all lectures, participants of the ENT block internship in the 2017/18 WS were asked about the quality of the lecture using an evaluation card. In addition, the increase in knowledge was examined in each of the newly designed lectures. A final questionnaire asked the students about their preferences regarding teaching methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, the new courses were not rated better than the regular ones, although the new concept was generally rated positively. It was not possible to attract more lecture attendees. However, the traditional teaching format "lecture" is still regarded as up to date by a defined group of students.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Despite a principally positive student assessment of a new lecture format, the 3D lectures did not achieve top marks in any category. This can be explained by the accumulation of unexpected student criticisms (quantity of the course content). Thus, the parameters intended as indicators (e-learning, quality of the course, use of modern teaching methods) could not fulfil their task. The result of the evaluation requires critical reflection and, if necessary, partial reorganization of the course (streamlining of content).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32130457
doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00834-z
pii: 10.1007/s00106-020-00834-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
263-271Références
Clin Teach. 2018 Feb;15(1):29-33
pubmed: 28300343
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 May 17;33(3):Doc46
pubmed: 27275511
Med Educ. 2017 Jun;51(6):585-597
pubmed: 28488303
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018 Dec 1;118(12):813-823
pubmed: 30476993
Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):207-12
pubmed: 16501260
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S73-6
pubmed: 17895696
HNO. 2020 Apr;68(4):257-262
pubmed: 31538215
Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Oct;2(5):199-204
pubmed: 19743508
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 14;14:81
pubmed: 24731511