Inequalities in early childhood care and development in low/middle-income countries: 2010-2018.
Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI)
children at risk of poor development
early care and education
early childhood development
early learning
home stimulation
inequality
Journal
BMJ global health
ISSN: 2059-7908
Titre abrégé: BMJ Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
13
01
2020
accepted:
15
01
2020
entrez:
6
3
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
7
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Inequalities in early childhood development (ECD) tend to persist into adulthood and amplify across the life course. To date, little research on inequalities in early childhood care and development in low/middle-income countries has been available to guide governments, donors and civil society in identifying which young children and families should be targeted by policies and programmes to improve nurturing care that could prevent them from being left behind. Using data from 135 Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys between 2010 and 2018, we assessed levels and trends of inequalities in exposure to risks of stunting or extreme poverty (under age 5; levels in 85 and trends in 40 countries), early attendance of early care and education programmes (36-59 months; 65 and 17 countries), home stimulation (36-59 months; 62 and 14 countries) and child development according to the Early Childhood Development Index (36-59 months; 60 and 13 countries). Inequalities within countries were measured as the absolute gap in three domains-child gender, household wealth and residential area-and compared across regions and country income groups. 63% of children were not exposed to stunting or extreme poverty; 39% of 3-4-year olds attended early care and education; and 69% received a level of reported home stimulation defined as adequate. Sub-Saharan Africa had the lowest proportion of children not exposed to stunting or extreme poverty (45%), attending early care and education (24%) and receiving adequate home stimulation (47%). Substantial gaps in all indicators were found across country income groups, residential areas and household wealth categories. There were no significant reductions in gaps over time for a subset of countries with available data in two survey rounds. Available data indicate large inequalities in early experiences and outcomes. Efforts of reducing these inequalities must focus on the poorest families and those living in rural areas in the poorest countries. Improving and applying population-level measurements on ECD in more countries over time are important for ensuring equal opportunities for young children globally.
Sections du résumé
Background
Inequalities in early childhood development (ECD) tend to persist into adulthood and amplify across the life course. To date, little research on inequalities in early childhood care and development in low/middle-income countries has been available to guide governments, donors and civil society in identifying which young children and families should be targeted by policies and programmes to improve nurturing care that could prevent them from being left behind.
Methods
Using data from 135 Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys between 2010 and 2018, we assessed levels and trends of inequalities in exposure to risks of stunting or extreme poverty (under age 5; levels in 85 and trends in 40 countries), early attendance of early care and education programmes (36-59 months; 65 and 17 countries), home stimulation (36-59 months; 62 and 14 countries) and child development according to the Early Childhood Development Index (36-59 months; 60 and 13 countries). Inequalities within countries were measured as the absolute gap in three domains-child gender, household wealth and residential area-and compared across regions and country income groups.
Results
63% of children were not exposed to stunting or extreme poverty; 39% of 3-4-year olds attended early care and education; and 69% received a level of reported home stimulation defined as adequate. Sub-Saharan Africa had the lowest proportion of children not exposed to stunting or extreme poverty (45%), attending early care and education (24%) and receiving adequate home stimulation (47%). Substantial gaps in all indicators were found across country income groups, residential areas and household wealth categories. There were no significant reductions in gaps over time for a subset of countries with available data in two survey rounds.
Conclusions
Available data indicate large inequalities in early experiences and outcomes. Efforts of reducing these inequalities must focus on the poorest families and those living in rural areas in the poorest countries. Improving and applying population-level measurements on ECD in more countries over time are important for ensuring equal opportunities for young children globally.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32133201
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002314
pii: bmjgh-2020-002314
pmc: PMC7042597
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
e002314Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Child Dev. 2010 Jan-Feb;81(1):306-25
pubmed: 20331669
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1842-1852
pubmed: 29673874
Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Sep;9 Suppl 2:69-82
pubmed: 24074319
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):77-90
pubmed: 27717614
Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369(9555):60-70
pubmed: 17208643
Demography. 2001 Feb;38(1):115-32
pubmed: 11227840
Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):e460-72
pubmed: 22218840
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 07;13(6):e1002034
pubmed: 27270467
Child Dev. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):46-61
pubmed: 22277006
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):91-102
pubmed: 27717615
Demography. 2012 Aug;49(3):913-38
pubmed: 22753083
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 15;36(4):1065-73
pubmed: 17513132
Lancet. 2007 Jan 13;369(9556):145-57
pubmed: 17223478
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):103-118
pubmed: 27717610
BMJ. 2020 Jan 26;368:l6915
pubmed: 31983681
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Dec;4(12):e916-e922
pubmed: 27717632