Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.
Congenital hearing loss
Data logging
Elderly
Hearing aids
Perimodiolar
Speech perception
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
02
01
2020
accepted:
17
02
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
7
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores. Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels. In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32140773
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05893-0
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-05893-0
pmc: PMC7198645
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1625-1635Références
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Oct;40(9):1160-1166
pubmed: 31469799
Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):342-60
pubmed: 23348845
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1314-9
pubmed: 27579834
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jan;39(1):e28-e33
pubmed: 29227449
HNO. 2019 Jun;67(Suppl 2):62-68
pubmed: 30944946
Hear Res. 2006 Feb;212(1-2):160-75
pubmed: 16403611
Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb;128(2):482-489
pubmed: 28643327
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Dec;274(12):4141-4148
pubmed: 29032420
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Mar;139(3):279-83
pubmed: 23657352
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:219
pubmed: 28270784
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec;37(10):1549-1554
pubmed: 27755356
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Nov;132(11):1000-1006
pubmed: 30370884
Laryngoscope. 2011 Dec;121(12):2634-40
pubmed: 22109764
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2352-2357
pubmed: 28304096
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Aug;27(5):624-33
pubmed: 16868510
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):962-8
pubmed: 21659922
Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S83
pubmed: 9391610
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):e405-e412
pubmed: 28984801
Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Mar;128(3):291-6
pubmed: 18274915
Laryngoscope. 2012 Jun;122(6):1361-5
pubmed: 22539093
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec;37(10):1662-1668
pubmed: 27755365
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):731-47
pubmed: 18816423
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Feb;40(2):145-153
pubmed: 30624395
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1238-45
pubmed: 27466894
Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21 Suppl 1:16-20
pubmed: 27806356
Cochlear Implants Int. 2019 Jul;20(4):207-216
pubmed: 30947632
Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1953;162(5):394-431
pubmed: 13092895
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;275(6):1385-1394
pubmed: 29610960
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Mar;40(3):e304-e310
pubmed: 30741911
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183674
pubmed: 28837630
J Am Acad Audiol. 1996 Jun;7(3):161-7
pubmed: 8780988
Audiol Res. 2012 Aug 14;2(1):e12
pubmed: 26557327
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Oct;29(7):920-8
pubmed: 18667935
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(6):317-325
pubmed: 29486475
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Feb;36(2):228-34
pubmed: 25473955
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):435-52
pubmed: 18344869
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48739
pubmed: 23152797
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Dec;36(10):1638-43
pubmed: 26496670
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Jul;18(4):192-197
pubmed: 28534710
Laryngoscope. 2013 Aug;123(8):1952-6
pubmed: 23737286
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(3):169-179
pubmed: 29059669
Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):1126-9
pubmed: 22374914
Cochlear Implants Int. 2019 Mar;20(2):80-90
pubmed: 30465637