Curve location influences spinal balance in coronal and sagittal planes but not transversal trunk motion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective observational study.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Left lumbar
Right thoracic
Sagittal balance
Transversal plane
Trunk balance
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
09
05
2019
accepted:
26
02
2020
revised:
13
01
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
7
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), spinal deformity can be seen in the thoracic or in the lumbar area. Although differences according to curve location are well described on standard radiographs, dynamic consequences of such difference remain unclear. Our objective was to explore the differences in dynamic spinal balance according to curve location in AIS patients using gait analysis METHODS: We prospectively included 22 females with AIS planned for surgical correction (16.3 years old, 81% Risser ≥ 4). Patients were divided into two matched cohorts, according to major curve location [right thoracic (Lenke 1) or left lumbar (Lenke 5)]. Gait analysis was performed the day before surgery. Global balance was analyzed as the primary outcome. Local curves parameters (dynamic Cobb angles) were defined as the secondary outcome. In coronal plane, Lenke 5 patients had a left trunk shift, whereas trunk was shifted to the right in Lenke 1 patients (- 20.7 vs 6.3, p = 0.001). In the sagittal plane, the main difference between the two groups was T12 position that remained over the pelvis during gait in Lenke 5 patients, whereas it was anterior to the pelvis in Lenke 1 patients. In the transversal plane, Lenke 5 and Lenke 1 patients presented the same gait abnormalities, with a global trunk rotation to the left (- 4.8 vs - 7.6, p = 0,165). This is the first study to provide the results of a direct comparison between Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 patients during gait. Curve location influenced coronal and sagittal balance, but abnormalities of transversal trunk motion were the same, wherever the curve was located. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32140786
doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06361-3
pii: 10.1007/s00586-020-06361-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1972-1980Références
Perdriolle R, Vidal J (1985) Thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curve evolution and prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198511000-00001
doi: 10.1097/00007632-198511000-00001
Perdriolle R, Vidal J (1987) Morphology of scoliosis: three-dimensional evolution. Orthopedics 10:909–915
pubmed: 3615285
Stokes IA (1989) Axial rotation component of thoracic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 7:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100070511
doi: 10.1002/jor.1100070511
pubmed: 2760743
Cholewicki J, Crisco JJ, Oxland TR et al (1996) Effects of posture and structure on three-dimensional coupled rotations in the lumbar spine. A biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2421–2428. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611010-00003
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00003
Tredwell SJ, Sawatzky BJ, Hughes BL (1999) Rotations of a helix as a model for correction of the scoliotic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1223–1227. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199906150-00009
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199906150-00009
Lenke LG (2005) Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect 54:537–542
pubmed: 15948478
Pesenti S, Jouve JL, Morin C et al (2015) Evolution of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a multicenter study at 20 years’ follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.004
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.004
Gage JR (1983) Gait analysis for decision-making in cerebral palsy. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 43:147–163
pubmed: 6317098
Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lunebourg A et al (2016) The John Insall Award: no functional benefit after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific instrumentation: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4259-0
doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4259-0
pubmed: 25791446
Ranavolo A, Don R, Draicchio F et al (2013) Modelling the spine as a deformable body: feasibility of reconstruction using an optoelectronic system. Appl Ergon 44:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.07.004
pubmed: 22871315
Lenke LG, Engsberg JR, Ross SA et al (2001) Prospective dynamic functional evaluation of gait and spinal balance following spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:E330–E337
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00020
Kramers-de Quervain IA, Müller R, Stacoff A et al (2004) Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 13:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x
doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x
pubmed: 15064994
pmcid: 3476595
Patel A, Pivec R, Shah NV et al (2018) Motion analysis in the axial plane after realignment surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture 66:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.015
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.015
pubmed: 30195821
Yang JH, Suh SW, Sung PS, Park WH (2013) Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:2407–2413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2845-y
doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2845-y
pubmed: 23732766
pmcid: 3886502
Mahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C (2009) Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J 18:512–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7
doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7
pubmed: 19224255
pmcid: 2899459
Nishida M, Nagura T, Fujita N et al (2019) Spinal correction surgery improves asymmetrical trunk kinematics during gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with thoracic major curve. Eur Spine J 28:619–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5741-7
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5741-7
pubmed: 30145657
Blondel B, Pomero V, Moal B et al (2012) Sagittal spine posture assessment: feasibility of a protocol based on intersegmental moments. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.12.001
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.12.001
pubmed: 22264566
Blondel B, Viehweger E, Moal B et al (2015) Postural spinal balance defined by net intersegmental moments: results of a biomechanical approach and experimental errors measurement. World J Orthop 6:983–990. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.983
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.983
pubmed: 26716095
pmcid: 4686446
Pesenti S, Prost S, Blondel B et al (2019) Correlations linking static quantitative gait analysis parameters to radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.09.024
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.09.024
pubmed: 31759939
Pesenti S, Prost S, Pomero V et al (2019) Characterization of trunk motion in adolescents with right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 28:2025–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06067-1
doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06067-1
pubmed: 31317309
Vora V, Crawford A, Babekhir N et al (2007) A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1869–1874. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318108b912
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318108b912
Nishida M, Nagura T, Fujita N et al (2017) Position of the major curve influences asymmetrical trunk kinematics during gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture 51:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.004
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.004
pubmed: 27764749
Thorstensson A, Nilsson J, Carlson H, Zomlefer MR (1984) Trunk movements in human locomotion. Acta Physiol Scand 121:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1984.tb10452.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1984.tb10452.x
pubmed: 6741583
Chung CY, Park MS, Lee SH et al (2010) Kinematic aspects of trunk motion and gender effect in normal adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-9
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-9
pubmed: 20156364
pmcid: 2843703
Assaiante C, Mallau S, Jouve J-L et al (2012) Do adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) neglect proprioceptive information in sensory integration of postural control? PLoS ONE 7:e40646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040646
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040646
pubmed: 22815779
pmcid: 3398941
Mallau S, Bollini G, Jouve J-L, Assaiante C (2007) Locomotor skills and balance strategies in adolescents idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E14–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251069.58498.eb
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251069.58498.eb