Effectiveness and safety of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Adverse events
EC-LAMS- electro-cautery-enhanced LAMS
LAMS- lumen-apposing metal stents
Malignant biliary obstruction
Technical and clinical success
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
23
07
2019
accepted:
26
02
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
16
6
2021
entrez:
7
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) is emerging as an alternative technique for biliary drainage in patients who fail conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are being increasingly used for CDD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CDD using LAMS. We performed a systematic search of multiple databases through May 2019 to identify studies on CDD using covered self-expanding metal stents. Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrent jaundice associated with CDD using LAMS were estimated. A subgroup analysis was performed based on use of LAMS with electrocautery-enhanced delivery system (EC-LAMS). Seven studies on CDD using LAMS (with 284 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 95.7% (95% CI 93.2-98.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 92.8-98.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.2% (95% CI 2.6-7.9). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 8.7% (95% CI 4.5-12.8). On subgroup analysis of CDD using EC-LAMS (5 studies with 201 patients), the pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 93.8% (95% CI 90.4-97.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 91.9-99.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.6% (95% CI 1.7-9.5). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 11.3% (95% CI 6.9-15.7). Heterogeneity (I CDD using LAMS/EC-LAMS is an effective and safe technique for biliary decompression in patients who failed ERCP. Further studies are needed to assess CDD using LAMS as primary treatment modality for biliary obstruction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) is emerging as an alternative technique for biliary drainage in patients who fail conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are being increasingly used for CDD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CDD using LAMS.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of multiple databases through May 2019 to identify studies on CDD using covered self-expanding metal stents. Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrent jaundice associated with CDD using LAMS were estimated. A subgroup analysis was performed based on use of LAMS with electrocautery-enhanced delivery system (EC-LAMS).
RESULTS
Seven studies on CDD using LAMS (with 284 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 95.7% (95% CI 93.2-98.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 92.8-98.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.2% (95% CI 2.6-7.9). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 8.7% (95% CI 4.5-12.8). On subgroup analysis of CDD using EC-LAMS (5 studies with 201 patients), the pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 93.8% (95% CI 90.4-97.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 91.9-99.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.6% (95% CI 1.7-9.5). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 11.3% (95% CI 6.9-15.7). Heterogeneity (I
CONCLUSION
CDD using LAMS/EC-LAMS is an effective and safe technique for biliary decompression in patients who failed ERCP. Further studies are needed to assess CDD using LAMS as primary treatment modality for biliary obstruction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32140862
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07484-w
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07484-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2866-2877Références
Meseeha M, Attia M (2019) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). StatPearls Treasure Island (FL)
Krishnamoorthi R, Jayaraj M, Kozarek R (2017) Endoscopic stents for the biliary tree and pancreas. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 15(3):397–415
doi: 10.1007/s11938-017-0139-x
Garcarek J, Kurcz J, Guzinski M, Janczak D, Sasiadek M (2012) Ten years single center experience in percutaneous transhepatic decompression of biliary tree in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. Adv Clin Exp Med 21(5):621–632
pubmed: 23356199
Krishnamoorthi R, Ross A (2019) Endoscopic management of biliary disorders: diagnosis and therapy. Surg Clin North America 99(2):369–386
doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.12.002
Itoi T, Dhir V (2016) EUS-guided biliary rendezvous: slow, hesitant, baby steps forward. Gastrointest Endosc 83(2):401–403
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.049
Itoi T, Dhir V, Moon JH (2017) EUS-guided biliary drainage: moving into a new era of biliary drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):915–917
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.026
Khashab MA, Van der Merwe S, Kunda R, El Zein MH, Teoh AY, Marson FP et al (2016) Prospective international multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endosc Int Open 4(4):E487–E496
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-102648
Hedjoudje A, Sportes A, Grabar S, Zhang A, Koch S, Vuitton L et al (2019) Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J 7(1):60–68
doi: 10.1177/2050640618808147
Kunda R, Perez-Miranda M, Will U, Ullrich S, Brenke D, Dollhopf M et al (2016) EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction using a lumen-apposing fully covered metal stent after failed ERCP. Surg Endosc 30(11):5002–5008
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4845-6
Mussetto A, Fugazza A, Fuccio L, Triossi O, Repici A, Anderloni A (2018) Current uses and outcomes of lumen-apposing metal stents. Ann Gastroenterol 31(5):535–540
pubmed: 30174389
pmcid: 6102456
Artifon EL, Takada J, Okawa L, Moura EG, Sakai P (2010) EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for biliary drainage in unresectable pancreatic cancer: a case series. Jop 11(6):597–600
pubmed: 21068493
Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Troncone E, Auriemma F, Carrara S, Semeraro R et al (2019) Single-stage EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 89(1):69–76
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.047
Itonaga M, Kitano M, Hatamaru K, Tamura T, Nuta J, Kawaji Y et al (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a thin stent delivery system in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Dig Endo 31(3):291–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13300
doi: 10.1111/den.13300
Rai P, Lokesh CR, Goel A, Aggarwal R (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy using partially-covered self-expandable metal stent in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction and unsuccessful ERCP. Endosc Int Open 6(1):E67–E72
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120664
Vila JJ, Perez-Miranda M, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Abadia MA, Perez-Millan A, Gonzalez-Huix F et al (2012) Initial experience with EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography for biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: a Spanish national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 76(6):1133–1141
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.001
Jacques J, Privat J, Pinard F, Fumex F, Valats JC, Chaoui A et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing stents: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 51(6):540–547
doi: 10.1055/a-0735-9137
EI Chafic AH, Shah JN, Hamerski C, Binmoeller KF, Irani S, James TW et al (2019) EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: first US Multicenter Experience. Dig Dis Sci 64(11):3321–3327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05688-2
doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05688-2
Tsuchiya T, Teoh AYB, Itoi T, Yamao K, Hara K, Nakai Y et al (2018) Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 87(4):1138–1146
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.017
Shah SL, Hajifathalian K, Issa D, Dawod QM et al (2019) A multicenter matched comparative analysis of EUS guided biliary drainage with lumen apposing metal stents versus fully covered metal stents. Dig Dis Week 89(6):AB606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.1049
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.1049
Teoh AYB, Kongkam P, Bapaye A, Ratanchu-ek T, Chan SM, Lee YN, Reknimitr R, Ridtitid W, Moon JH (2019) Prospective multicenter international study on the use of A newly developed self approximating lumen apposing metallic stent for drainage of the bile duct and gallbladder. Dig Dis Week. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13494
doi: 10.1111/den.13494
Higgins J GS. cochrane handbook of systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. 2011.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Internal Med. 151(4):264–269
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605
doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1294–1302
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017
Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA, Matthews DR (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337(8746):867–872
doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y
Itonaga M, Kitano M, Hatamaru K, Tamura T, Nuta J, Kawaji Y et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a thin stent delivery system in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Digest Endosc 31(3):291–298
doi: 10.1111/den.13300
Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, Choi JH, Kim SO, Jang S et al (2018) EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol 113(7):987–997
doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8
Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S (2018) Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 88(1):9–17
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.012
Cho DH, Lee SS, Oh D, Song TJ, Park DH, Seo DW et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of a newly developed hybrid metal stent for EUS-guided biliary drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):1067–1075
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.010
Artifon EL, Marson FP, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M, Otoch JP (2015) Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: is there any difference? Gastrointest Endosc 81(4):950–959
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.047
Chan SM, Teoh AY (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a review. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 13(2):171–184
doi: 10.1007/s11938-015-0047-x
Park JK, Woo YS, Noh DH, Yang JI, Bae SY, Yun HS et al (2018) Efficacy of EUS-guided and ERCP-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: prospective randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 88(2):277–282
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.015
Attasaranya S, Netinasunton N, Jongboonyanuparp T, Sottisuporn J, Witeerungrot T, Pirathvisuth T et al (2012) The spectrum of endoscopic ultrasound intervention in biliary diseases: a single center's experience in 31 cases. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:680753
doi: 10.1155/2012/680753
Jain D, Shah M, Patel U, Sharma A, Singhal S (2018) Endoscopic. Digestion 98(1):1–10
doi: 10.1159/000487185
Wang K, Zhu J, Xing L, Wang Y, Jin Z, Li Z (2016) Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 83(6):1218–1227
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.033
Kalva NR, Vanar V, Forcione D, Bechtold ML, Puli SR (2018) Efficacy and Safety of lumen apposing self-expandable metal stents for EUS guided cholecystostomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018:7070961
doi: 10.1155/2018/7070961
Garcia-Alonso FJ, Sanchez-Ocana R, Penas-Herrero I, Law R, Sevilla-Ribota S, Torres-Yuste R et al (2018) Cumulative risks of stent migration and gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with lumen-apposing metal stents. Endoscopy 50(4):386–395
doi: 10.1055/a-0581-9040
Brimhall B, Han S, Tatman PD, Clark TJ, Wani S, Brauer B et al (2018) Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm bleeding with lumen-apposing metal stents compared to double-pigtail plastic stents in patients with peripancreatic fluid collections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(9):1521–1528
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.021