Assessment of the diagnostic efficacy of abdominal ultrasonography and cine magnetic resonance imaging in detecting abdominal adhesions: A double-blind research study.
Abdominal Wall
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Peritoneal Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tissue Adhesions
/ diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
/ methods
Abdominal ultrasonography
Adhesion
Cine magnetic resonance imaging
Visceral slide test
Journal
European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
07
01
2020
revised:
21
02
2020
accepted:
28
02
2020
pubmed:
8
3
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
8
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This cohort aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of abdominal ulrasonography and cine-MRI by a double-blind study in the diagnosis of intraabdominal organs and abdominal wall adhesions in patients with previous abdominal operations. Between 2017 and 2019, 108 consecutive patients were prospectively included in the study. Visceral slide and induced visceral slide were measured during AU and cine-MRI. An abdominal map consisting of nine segments was created to document the location and extent of the adhesion. The degree and severity of the adhesions detected by the radiologist preoperatively and detected in surgery as the gold standard was recorded in the same abdominal zones. AU, c-MRI and intraoperative findings were correlated. The mean age was 53.0 ± 10.3 years, body mass index was 30.4 ± 3.4, male (52.8 %) and female (47.2 %). According to the total nine zones, the sensitivity of AU was 91.4 %, specificity was 100 %, positive predictive value was 90.7 %, negative predictive value was 100 % and diagnostic accuracy was 87.9 %. Considering the total zones, the sensitivity of c-MRI was 90.8 %, specificity was 100 %, PPV was 90.7 %, NPV was 100 % and diagnostic accuracy was 91.7 %. A comparison of AU and c-MRI showed no significant difference in the detection of adhesions to the abdominal wall; however, c-MRI was superior in detecting intraabdominal organs adhesion. We have demonstrated that AU and c-MRI are accurate for diagnosing adhesions in patients undergoing repeated surgery and may have a place on planning elective laparoscopic or open surgery to avoid bowel injury.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32145598
pii: S0720-048X(20)30111-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108922
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108922Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.