Design of a home-based intervention for Houston-area African-American adults with asthma: Methods and lessons learned from a pragmatic randomized trial.
Black or African American
Asthma
/ ethnology
Comorbidity
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
House Calls
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Patient Education as Topic
/ organization & administration
Patient-Centered Care
/ organization & administration
Quality of Life
Research Design
Respiratory Function Tests
Self-Management
Severity of Illness Index
Asthma
Patient-centered outcomes research
Pragmatic trial
Study recruitment
Vulnerable populations
Journal
Contemporary clinical trials
ISSN: 1559-2030
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101242342
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
01
12
2019
revised:
24
02
2020
accepted:
02
03
2020
pubmed:
11
3
2020
medline:
5
8
2021
entrez:
11
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A growing body of evidence demonstrates that home-based, multicomponent interventions can effectively reduce exposures to asthma triggers and decrease asthma symptoms. However, few of these studies have targeted adults. To address this and other research gaps, we designed and implemented a pragmatic randomized clinical trial, the Houston Home-based Integrated Intervention Targeting Better Asthma Control (HIITBAC) for African Americans, to assess the effectiveness of a home-based intervention to improve asthma control and quality of life in African-American adults-a population disproportionately affected by asthma. The primary goals were to help participants reduce allergens and irritants in their homes and better manage their disease through knowledge, improved medication use, and behavior change. HIITBAC had two groups: clinic-only and home-visit groups. Both groups received enhanced clinical care, but the home-visit group also received a detailed home assessment and four additional home visits spaced over roughly one year. We recruited 263 participants. Of these, 152 (57.8%) were recruited through electronic health record data, 51 (19.4%) through Emergency Medical Services data, and 60 (22.8%) through other efforts (e.g., emergency departments, community events, outreach). Seventy participants (26.6%) were lost to follow up, substantially more in the home-visit than in the clinic-only group. We describe the HIITBAC methodology and cohort, discuss lessons learned about recruitment and retention, and highlight adaptations we implemented to address these lessons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32151753
pii: S1551-7144(20)30055-0
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105977
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02253433']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105977Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.