Histopathological Revision for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Expert Centers: Does It Make the Difference?


Journal

Neuroendocrinology
ISSN: 1423-0194
Titre abrégé: Neuroendocrinology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0035665

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 12 11 2019
accepted: 09 03 2020
pubmed: 11 3 2020
medline: 5 10 2021
entrez: 11 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The correct histopathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is crucial for treatment selection and prognostication. It is also very challenging due to limited experience in nonexpert centers. Revision of pathology is standard of care for most patients who are referred to NEN expert centers. To describe the clinical impact of histopathological revision for GEP-NEN patients referred to an expert center. Retrospective multicenter analysis of all GEP-NENs receiving a histopathological revision in 6 European NEN expert centers (January 2016 to December 2016) to evaluate the impact on patient management. 175 patients were included and 14.7% referred for a second opinion. Histological samples were 69.1% biopsies, 23.4% surgical specimens, and 7.5% endoscopic resections. Histopathological changes due to revision included first assessment of Ki67 in 8.6% of cases, change in grading in 11.4% (3.4% G1 to G2; 5.7% G2 to G1; 0.6% G2 to G3; 1.7% G3 to G2), definition of tumor invasion in 10.8%, additional immunohistochemical staining in 2.3%, diagnosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in 3.4%, exclusion of NEN in 3.4%, first diagnosis of NEN in 2.3%, and tumor differentiation for G3 in 1.7%. The revision had a clinical impact in 36.0% of patients, leading to a new therapeutic indication in 26.3%. The indication to then perform a new imaging test occurred in 21.1% and recommendation to follow-up with no further treatment in 6.3%. Histopathological revision in expert centers for NENs can change the diagnosis, with a significant clinical impact in about one third of patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The correct histopathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is crucial for treatment selection and prognostication. It is also very challenging due to limited experience in nonexpert centers. Revision of pathology is standard of care for most patients who are referred to NEN expert centers.
OBJECTIVES
To describe the clinical impact of histopathological revision for GEP-NEN patients referred to an expert center.
METHODS
Retrospective multicenter analysis of all GEP-NENs receiving a histopathological revision in 6 European NEN expert centers (January 2016 to December 2016) to evaluate the impact on patient management.
RESULTS
175 patients were included and 14.7% referred for a second opinion. Histological samples were 69.1% biopsies, 23.4% surgical specimens, and 7.5% endoscopic resections. Histopathological changes due to revision included first assessment of Ki67 in 8.6% of cases, change in grading in 11.4% (3.4% G1 to G2; 5.7% G2 to G1; 0.6% G2 to G3; 1.7% G3 to G2), definition of tumor invasion in 10.8%, additional immunohistochemical staining in 2.3%, diagnosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in 3.4%, exclusion of NEN in 3.4%, first diagnosis of NEN in 2.3%, and tumor differentiation for G3 in 1.7%. The revision had a clinical impact in 36.0% of patients, leading to a new therapeutic indication in 26.3%. The indication to then perform a new imaging test occurred in 21.1% and recommendation to follow-up with no further treatment in 6.3%.
CONCLUSIONS
Histopathological revision in expert centers for NENs can change the diagnosis, with a significant clinical impact in about one third of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32155627
pii: 000507082
doi: 10.1159/000507082
doi:

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

170-177

Informations de copyright

© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Elettra Merola (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Azienda Provinciale Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy, elettra.merola@gmail.com.

Wouter Zandee (W)

Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Louis de Mestier (L)

Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital (APHP) and Paris 7 University, Clichy, France.

Heinz Josef Klümpen (HJ)

Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Karolina Makulik (K)

Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Karen Geboes (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Marie Louise van Velthuysen (ML)

Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Anne Couvelard (A)

Department of Pathology, Beaujon/Bichat Hospital (APHP) and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.

Jérôme Cros (J)

Department of Pathology, Beaujon/Bichat Hospital (APHP) and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.

Susanne van Eeden (S)

Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Anne Hoorens (A)

Department of Pathology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Timothy Stephenson (T)

Department of Pathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

W Zajęcki (W)

Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Wouter de Herder (W)

Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Alia Munir (A)

Department of Endocrinology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH