Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of pelvic ultrasound for the detection and measurement of endometriotic lesions.
endometrioma
endometriosis
nodule
reproducibility
ultrasound
Journal
Human reproduction open
ISSN: 2399-3529
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101722764
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
09
09
2019
revised:
16
12
2019
entrez:
13
3
2020
pubmed:
13
3
2020
medline:
13
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
What is the interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of pelvic ultrasound for the detection of endometriotic lesions? Pelvic ultrasound is highly reproducible for the detection of pelvic endometriotic lesions. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) has been widely adopted as the first-line assessment for the diagnosis and assessment of pelvic endometriosis. Severity of endometriosis as assessed by ultrasound has been shown to have good concordance with laparoscopy (kappa 0.79). The reproducibility of TVS for assessment of ovarian mobility and pouch of Douglas obliteration using the 'sliding sign' has already been described in the literature. However, there is no available data in the literature to demonstrate the intraobserver repeatability of measurements for endometriotic cysts and nodules. This was a prospective observational cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 12 months. We included 50 consecutive women who were all examined by two operators (A and B) during their clinic attendance. The study was carried out in a specialist endometriosis centre. We included all consecutive women who had ultrasound scans performed independently by two experienced operators during the same visit to the clinic. The outcomes of interest were the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the detection of endometriotic lesions. We also assessed repeatability of the measurements of lesion size. There was a good level of agreement between operator A and operator B in detecting the presence of pelvic endometriotic lesions ( Within this cohort, there was insufficient data to perform a separate analysis for nodule size in the anterior compartment. All examinations were performed within a specialised unit with a high prevalence of deep endometriosis. Our findings may not apply to operators without intensive ultrasound training in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. These findings are important because ultrasound has been widely accepted as the first-line investigation for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis, which often determines the need for future investigations and treatment. The detection and measurement of bowel nodules is essential for anticipation of surgical risk and planning surgical excision. The authors have no conflict of interest. No funding was obtained for this work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32161818
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa001
pii: hoaa001
pmc: PMC7060019
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
hoaa001Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):734-743
pubmed: 29527712
Hum Reprod. 2009 Mar;24(3):602-7
pubmed: 19095669
Acta Radiol. 2010 Jun;51(5):573-80
pubmed: 20380608
Fertil Steril. 1993 Nov;60(5):776-80
pubmed: 8224260
Hum Reprod. 2007 Dec;22(12):3092-7
pubmed: 17947378
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;20(6):630-4
pubmed: 12493057
BMJ. 1992 Jun 6;304(6840):1491-4
pubmed: 1611375
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov - Dec;25(7):1231-1240
pubmed: 29545217
Ultraschall Med. 2006 Feb;27(1):79-105
pubmed: 16508866
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;47(3):281-9
pubmed: 26213903
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60
pubmed: 10501650
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;36(2):241-8
pubmed: 20503231
Urol Int. 2012;89(3):249-58
pubmed: 22813980
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;35(6):730-40
pubmed: 20503240
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1237-46
pubmed: 23482338
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):318-32
pubmed: 27349699
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):210-5
pubmed: 22745055
Fertil Steril. 2003 Apr;79(4):1023-7
pubmed: 12749448