Prognostic and Predictive Value of Microsatellite Instability, Inflammatory Reaction and PD-L1 in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Either Adjuvant 5-FU/LV or Sequential FOLFIRI Followed by Cisplatin and Docetaxel: A Translational Analysis from the ITACA-S Trial.
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Biomarkers
Gastric cancer
Microsatellite instability
PD-L1
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
received:
20
06
2019
accepted:
16
10
2019
entrez:
13
3
2020
pubmed:
13
3
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI) gastric cancer (GC) show improved survival and no benefit or harm from adjuvant and/or perioperative chemotherapy. The role of immune microenvironment in GC is largely unknown. In the present study, 256 tumor tissue blocks were centrally collected from patients enrolled in ITACA-S, a randomized adjuvant trial of 5-FU/LV versus sequential FOLFIRI and cisplatin-docetaxel. MSI status was assessed by multiplex PCR, inflammatory reaction by H&E morphological assessment, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry. Overall, 9% patients had MSI-high tumors, 23% had high inflammatory reaction, 11% had tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1%, and 11% had stromal PD-L1 ≥ 1%. A significant association with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was found for MSI-high (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; p = .02; HR, 0.40; p = .02) and high inflammatory reaction (HR, 0.55; p = .010; HR, 0.53; p = .008) but not for PD-L1. At multivariable analysis, only MSI showed an independent association with both DFS (p = .02) and OS (p = .01), whereas inflammatory reaction showed an independent association only with OS (p = .04). Patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% had a significantly longer DFS in sequential chemotherapy than in than 5-FU/LV arm (interaction p = .04) and a trend for OS (interaction p = .12). Our data suggest that MSI status could be a useful prognostic biomarker in patients with radically resected stage II-III GC and should be used as stratification factor in future trials. Tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% should be further investigated as a potential predictor of benefit from intensive chemotherapy. In this post hoc analysis of patients with radically resected gastric cancer randomized to an intensive sequential chemotherapy regimen versus 5-FU/LV monotherapy as adjuvant treatment in the ITACA-S trial, MSI-high status was independently associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) and inflammatory reaction was independently associated with better OS. Moreover, tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% was associated with greater benefit from intensive sequential chemotherapy compared with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV), whereas PD-L1 expression <1% was not, conditioning a statistically significant interaction between such biomarker and treatment arms. The meta-analysis of individual patients' data from available studies could yield data on the role of MSI status that could inform clinical decisions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI) gastric cancer (GC) show improved survival and no benefit or harm from adjuvant and/or perioperative chemotherapy. The role of immune microenvironment in GC is largely unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the present study, 256 tumor tissue blocks were centrally collected from patients enrolled in ITACA-S, a randomized adjuvant trial of 5-FU/LV versus sequential FOLFIRI and cisplatin-docetaxel. MSI status was assessed by multiplex PCR, inflammatory reaction by H&E morphological assessment, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS
Overall, 9% patients had MSI-high tumors, 23% had high inflammatory reaction, 11% had tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1%, and 11% had stromal PD-L1 ≥ 1%. A significant association with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was found for MSI-high (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; p = .02; HR, 0.40; p = .02) and high inflammatory reaction (HR, 0.55; p = .010; HR, 0.53; p = .008) but not for PD-L1. At multivariable analysis, only MSI showed an independent association with both DFS (p = .02) and OS (p = .01), whereas inflammatory reaction showed an independent association only with OS (p = .04). Patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% had a significantly longer DFS in sequential chemotherapy than in than 5-FU/LV arm (interaction p = .04) and a trend for OS (interaction p = .12).
CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that MSI status could be a useful prognostic biomarker in patients with radically resected stage II-III GC and should be used as stratification factor in future trials. Tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% should be further investigated as a potential predictor of benefit from intensive chemotherapy.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
In this post hoc analysis of patients with radically resected gastric cancer randomized to an intensive sequential chemotherapy regimen versus 5-FU/LV monotherapy as adjuvant treatment in the ITACA-S trial, MSI-high status was independently associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) and inflammatory reaction was independently associated with better OS. Moreover, tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% was associated with greater benefit from intensive sequential chemotherapy compared with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV), whereas PD-L1 expression <1% was not, conditioning a statistically significant interaction between such biomarker and treatment arms. The meta-analysis of individual patients' data from available studies could yield data on the role of MSI status that could inform clinical decisions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32162808
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0471
pmc: PMC7066701
doi:
Substances chimiques
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e460-e468Informations de copyright
© AlphaMed Press 2019.
Références
Nat Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):920-928
pubmed: 31086347
Oncology. 2019;97(1):38-43
pubmed: 31048579
Br J Surg. 2018 Feb;105(3):159-167
pubmed: 29091259
Nature. 2014 Sep 11;513(7517):202-9
pubmed: 25079317
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Apr;19(2):412-420
pubmed: 25862567
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jul;32(7):929-942
pubmed: 30760860
Gastroenterology. 2002 Dec;123(6):1804-11
pubmed: 12454837
Ann Oncol. 2014 Feb;25(2):404-8
pubmed: 24379162
Gastric Cancer. 2020 Jan;23(1):95-104
pubmed: 31451991
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):4441-4449
pubmed: 28747339
Trends Mol Med. 2016 Jul;22(7):534-544
pubmed: 27260398
Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):309-316
pubmed: 29727332
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v38-v49
pubmed: 27664260
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 22;8(35):58887-58902
pubmed: 28938605
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3219-26
pubmed: 20498393
Nat Med. 2015 May;21(5):449-56
pubmed: 25894828
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 28;6:37933
pubmed: 27892511
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):629-638
pubmed: 29567071
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):943-50
pubmed: 26530444
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3392-3400
pubmed: 31513484
Cancer Discov. 2015 Jan;5(1):43-51
pubmed: 25358689
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Apr;3(4):326-32
pubmed: 25527356
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Nov;41(17):2645-54
pubmed: 16239109
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 20;30(3):268-73
pubmed: 22184384
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 01;3(9):1197-1203
pubmed: 28241187
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182692
pubmed: 28796808
Gastric Cancer. 2020 Jan;23(1):73-81
pubmed: 31267360
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1750925
pubmed: 29387716
Mod Pathol. 2003 Jul;16(7):641-51
pubmed: 12861059
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1373-1378
pubmed: 24728035
Lancet. 2012 Jan 28;379(9813):315-21
pubmed: 22226517
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Int J Cancer. 2011 Apr 1;128(7):1606-13
pubmed: 20533283
Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):123-133
pubmed: 29880231