Association of Germline Variant Status With Therapy Response in High-risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the GeparOcto Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 13 3 2020
medline: 5 1 2021
entrez: 13 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The GeparOcto randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of 2 neoadjuvant breast cancer (BC) treatment regimens: sequential intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) vs weekly paclitaxel and nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PM) in patients with different biological BC subtypes. Patients with triple-negative BC (TNBC) randomized to the PM arm received additional carboplatin (PMCb). Overall, no difference in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates was observed between study arms. It remained elusive whether the germline variant status of BRCA1/2 and further BC predisposition genes are associated with treatment outcome. To determine treatment outcome for BC according to germline variant status. This retrospective biomarker study is a secondary analysis of the GeparOcto multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial conducted between December 2014 and June 2016. Genetic analyses assessing for variants in BRCA1/2 and 16 other BC predisposition genes in 914 of 945 women were performed at the Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany, from August 2017 through December 2018. Proportion of patients who achieved pCR (ypT0/is ypN0 definition) after neoadjuvant treatment according to germline variant status. In the study sample of 914 women with different BC subtypes with a mean (range) age at BC diagnosis of 48 (21-76) years, overall higher pCR rates were observed in patients with BRCA1/2 variants than in patients without (60.4% vs 46.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.13-2.68; P = .01); variants in non-BRCA1/2 BC predisposition genes were not associated with therapy response. Patients with TNBC with BRCA1/2 variants achieved highest pCR rates. In the TNBC subgroup, a positive BRCA1/2 variant status was associated with therapy response in both the PMCb arm (74.3% vs 47.0% without BRCA1/2 variant; OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.44-7.39; P = .005) and the iddEPC arm (64.7% vs 45.0%; OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.04-4.84; P = .04). A positive BRCA1/2 variant status was also associated with elevated pCR rates in patients with ERBB2-negative, hormone receptor-positive BC (31.8% vs 11.9%; OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.22-9.72; P = .02). Effective chemotherapy for BRCA1/2-mutated TNBC is commonly suggested to be platinum based. With a pCR rate of 64.7%, iddEPC may also be effective in these patients, though further prospective studies are needed. The elevated pCR rate in BRCA1/2-mutated ERBB2-negative, hormone receptor-positive BC suggests that germline BRCA1/2 testing should be considered prior to treatment start. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02125344.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32163106
pii: 2762579
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0007
pmc: PMC7068666
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02125344']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

744-748

Références

Cancer Med. 2018 Apr;7(4):1349-1358
pubmed: 29522266
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1378-1385
pubmed: 28715532
Breast Care (Basel). 2017 Mar;12(1):15-19
pubmed: 28611536
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Sep;147(2):401-5
pubmed: 25129345
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):628-637
pubmed: 29713086
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;106:181-192
pubmed: 30528802
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Feb;155(3):597-601
pubmed: 26888723
Mol Oncol. 2015 Oct;9(8):1528-38
pubmed: 26004083
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2243-57
pubmed: 26014596
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1245-1248
pubmed: 28033443

Auteurs

Esther Pohl-Rescigno (E)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Jan Hauke (J)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Sibylle Loibl (S)

German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.

Volker Möbus (V)

Department of Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Carsten Denkert (C)

Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Peter A Fasching (PA)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Mohamad Kayali (M)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Corinna Ernst (C)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Nana Weber-Lassalle (N)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Claus Hanusch (C)

Rotkreuzklinikum München, Frauenklinik, Munich, Germany.

Hans Tesch (H)

Hämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Frankfurt, Germany.

Volkmar Müller (V)

Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.

Janine Altmüller (J)

Cologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Holger Thiele (H)

Cologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Michael Untch (M)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.

Kristina Lübbe (K)

Breast Center, Diakovere Henriettenstift, Hannover, Germany.

Peter Nürnberg (P)

Cologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Kerstin Rhiem (K)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Jenny Furlanetto (J)

German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.

Bianca Lederer (B)

German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.

Christian Jackisch (C)

Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany.

Valentina Nekljudova (V)

German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.

Rita K Schmutzler (RK)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Andreas Schneeweiss (A)

National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Eric Hahnen (E)

Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH