Development and testing of an informative guide about palliative care for family caregivers of people with advanced dementia.


Journal

BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 18 11 2019
accepted: 26 02 2020
entrez: 14 3 2020
pubmed: 14 3 2020
medline: 31 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since people with advanced dementia are usually not able to make complex decisions, it is usually the family caregivers, as proxies, who have to decide on treatments and their termination. However, these decisions are difficult for the caregivers to make, as they are often inadequately informed and cannot properly assess the consequences; moreover, they are concerned about harming the sick person. We aimed to first develop an informative booklet about palliative care issues for caregivers of people with advanced dementia. Secondly, we aimed to investigate a change in family caregivers' knowledge regarding palliative care issues and caregivers' involvement in medical and care decisions before and after studying this booklet. A first version of the booklet was drafted by an experienced psychiatrist and palliative care specialist based on existing booklets and guidelines; necessary cultural adaptions were taken into consideration. A nominal group process was conducted to develop the informative guide. In order to investigate the acceptance of the booklet and the possibility to implement it, 38 patient-caregiver dyads were recruited, and caregivers were interviewed both before receiving the booklet and after 3 months of receiving the booklet. Experts from various disciplines collaborated on a German booklet for family caregivers of people with advanced dementia as an information aid regarding issues of palliative care. The subsequent test showed that all caregivers had experienced a personal benefit from the booklet. Caregivers had a significant gain of knowledge after provision of the booklet. A large proportion of caregivers who had not previously considered and/or discussed medical topics reported that they had done so within 3 months after obtaining the booklet, or planned to do so in the near future. The caregivers valued the comprehensible, concise and well-structured information guide on palliative care issues in advanced dementia. They agreed it increases knowledge and prompts decision making and therefore should be developed in many languages and disseminated among family caregivers of people with dementia. clinicaltrial.gov, NCT03548142. Retrospectively registered 7 June 2018.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Since people with advanced dementia are usually not able to make complex decisions, it is usually the family caregivers, as proxies, who have to decide on treatments and their termination. However, these decisions are difficult for the caregivers to make, as they are often inadequately informed and cannot properly assess the consequences; moreover, they are concerned about harming the sick person. We aimed to first develop an informative booklet about palliative care issues for caregivers of people with advanced dementia. Secondly, we aimed to investigate a change in family caregivers' knowledge regarding palliative care issues and caregivers' involvement in medical and care decisions before and after studying this booklet.
METHODS METHODS
A first version of the booklet was drafted by an experienced psychiatrist and palliative care specialist based on existing booklets and guidelines; necessary cultural adaptions were taken into consideration. A nominal group process was conducted to develop the informative guide. In order to investigate the acceptance of the booklet and the possibility to implement it, 38 patient-caregiver dyads were recruited, and caregivers were interviewed both before receiving the booklet and after 3 months of receiving the booklet.
RESULTS RESULTS
Experts from various disciplines collaborated on a German booklet for family caregivers of people with advanced dementia as an information aid regarding issues of palliative care. The subsequent test showed that all caregivers had experienced a personal benefit from the booklet. Caregivers had a significant gain of knowledge after provision of the booklet. A large proportion of caregivers who had not previously considered and/or discussed medical topics reported that they had done so within 3 months after obtaining the booklet, or planned to do so in the near future.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The caregivers valued the comprehensible, concise and well-structured information guide on palliative care issues in advanced dementia. They agreed it increases knowledge and prompts decision making and therefore should be developed in many languages and disseminated among family caregivers of people with dementia.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
clinicaltrial.gov, NCT03548142. Retrospectively registered 7 June 2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32164707
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0533-3
pii: 10.1186/s12904-020-0533-3
pmc: PMC7068859
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03548142']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

30

Subventions

Organisme : Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Gesundheit und Pflege (DE)
ID : n.a.

Références

J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
J Palliat Med. 2006 Jun;9(3):683-93
pubmed: 16752974
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jun 21;17(1):88
pubmed: 29933758
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2533-40
pubmed: 26107053
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jul;57(7):1149-55
pubmed: 19486200
J Palliat Med. 2011 May;14(5):614-22
pubmed: 21486116
Nurs Health Sci. 2010 Mar;12(1):45-51
pubmed: 20487325
Eur J Neurol. 2009 Apr;16(4):488-92
pubmed: 19170740
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2015 Aug;21(8):385-91
pubmed: 26312534
J Med Ethics. 2013 Feb;39(2):104-9
pubmed: 23144015
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4
pubmed: 8232972
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Apr;15(4):251-5
pubmed: 24508326
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;5(1):29-33
pubmed: 2299426
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2013 Feb;19(2):67-74
pubmed: 23435535
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Aug;62(8):981-992
pubmed: 31297549

Auteurs

Lina Riedl (L)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. lina.riedl@tum.de.

Manuela Bertok (M)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Julia Hartmann (J)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Julia Fischer (J)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Carola Rossmeier (C)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Andreas Dinkel (A)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Langerstr. 3, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Marion Ortner (M)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Janine Diehl-Schmid (J)

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH