MEMPHIS: a smartphone app using psychological approaches for women with chronic pelvic pain presenting to gynaecology clinics: a randomised feasibility trial.
Randomised controlled trial
chronic pain
meditation
mindfulness
mobile applications
pelvic pain
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 03 2020
12 03 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
3
2020
pubmed:
14
3
2020
medline:
16
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial of a modified, pre-existing, mindfulness meditation smartphone app for women with chronic pelvic pain. Three arm randomised feasibility trial. Women were recruited at two gynaecology clinics in the UK. Interventions were delivered via smartphone or computer at a location of participants choosing. Women were eligible for the study if they were over 18, had been experiencing organic or non-organic chronic pelvic pain for 6 months or more, and had access to a computer or smartphone. 90 women were randomised. Daily mindfulness meditation delivered by smartphone app, an active control app which delivered muscle relaxation techniques, and usual care without app. Interventions were delivered over 60 days. Outcomes included length of recruitment, follow-up rates, adherence to the app interventions, and clinical outcomes measured at baseline, two, three and 6 months. The target sample size was recruited in 145 days. Adherence to the app interventions was extremely low (mean app use 1.8 days mindfulness meditation group, 7.0 days active control). Fifty-seven (63%) women completed 6-month follow-up, and 75 (83%) women completed at least one postrandomisation follow-up. The 95% CIs for clinical outcomes were consistent with no benefit from the mindfulness meditation app; for example, mean differences in pain acceptance scores at 60 days (higher scores are better) were -2.3 (mindfulness meditation vs usual care, 95% CI: -6.6 to 2.0) and -4.0 (mindfulness meditation vs active control, 95% CI: -8.1 to 0.1). Despite high recruitment and adequate follow-up rates, demonstrating feasibility, the extremely low adherence suggests a definitive randomised trial of the mindfulness meditation app used in this study is not warranted. Future research should focus on improving patient engagement. NCT02721108; ISRCTN10925965; Results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32165549
pii: bmjopen-2019-030164
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030164
pmc: PMC7069270
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02721108']
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN10925965']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e030164Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Trials. 2014 Jul 03;15:264
pubmed: 24993581
Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-149
pubmed: 1408309
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May;63(5):707-11
pubmed: 19392920
Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):435-443
pubmed: 20188472
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jan 15;7(1):e8
pubmed: 29335232
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Eur J Pain. 2007 Feb;11(2):153-63
pubmed: 16446108
BMJ. 2011 Feb 07;342:d40
pubmed: 21300711
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64
pubmed: 27965879
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 May;77(5):740-4
pubmed: 1826544
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 06;6:177
pubmed: 16824213
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e030711
pubmed: 32165550
J R Soc Med. 2002 Nov;95(11):531-5
pubmed: 12411615
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;29(6):359-366
pubmed: 28961631
J Reprod Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(3-4):158-62
pubmed: 21542535
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;198(6):710.e1-8; discussion 710.e8-9
pubmed: 18538161
BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1016-20
pubmed: 8616351
Trials. 2014 Apr 23;15:139
pubmed: 24755011
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Apr;51(2):199-213
pubmed: 27658913
BMJ. 2010 Oct 05;341:c4834
pubmed: 20923840
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;184(6):1149-55
pubmed: 11349181
Stat Med. 2005 Apr 15;24(7):993-1007
pubmed: 15570623