MEMPHIS: a smartphone app using psychological approaches for women with chronic pelvic pain presenting to gynaecology clinics: a randomised feasibility trial.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 03 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 3 2020
pubmed: 14 3 2020
medline: 16 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial of a modified, pre-existing, mindfulness meditation smartphone app for women with chronic pelvic pain. Three arm randomised feasibility trial. Women were recruited at two gynaecology clinics in the UK. Interventions were delivered via smartphone or computer at a location of participants choosing. Women were eligible for the study if they were over 18, had been experiencing organic or non-organic chronic pelvic pain for 6 months or more, and had access to a computer or smartphone. 90 women were randomised. Daily mindfulness meditation delivered by smartphone app, an active control app which delivered muscle relaxation techniques, and usual care without app. Interventions were delivered over 60 days. Outcomes included length of recruitment, follow-up rates, adherence to the app interventions, and clinical outcomes measured at baseline, two, three and 6 months. The target sample size was recruited in 145 days. Adherence to the app interventions was extremely low (mean app use 1.8 days mindfulness meditation group, 7.0 days active control). Fifty-seven (63%) women completed 6-month follow-up, and 75 (83%) women completed at least one postrandomisation follow-up. The 95% CIs for clinical outcomes were consistent with no benefit from the mindfulness meditation app; for example, mean differences in pain acceptance scores at 60 days (higher scores are better) were -2.3 (mindfulness meditation vs usual care, 95% CI: -6.6 to 2.0) and -4.0 (mindfulness meditation vs active control, 95% CI: -8.1 to 0.1). Despite high recruitment and adequate follow-up rates, demonstrating feasibility, the extremely low adherence suggests a definitive randomised trial of the mindfulness meditation app used in this study is not warranted. Future research should focus on improving patient engagement. NCT02721108; ISRCTN10925965; Results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32165549
pii: bmjopen-2019-030164
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030164
pmc: PMC7069270
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02721108']
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN10925965']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e030164

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Trials. 2014 Jul 03;15:264
pubmed: 24993581
Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-149
pubmed: 1408309
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May;63(5):707-11
pubmed: 19392920
Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):435-443
pubmed: 20188472
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jan 15;7(1):e8
pubmed: 29335232
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Eur J Pain. 2007 Feb;11(2):153-63
pubmed: 16446108
BMJ. 2011 Feb 07;342:d40
pubmed: 21300711
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64
pubmed: 27965879
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 May;77(5):740-4
pubmed: 1826544
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 06;6:177
pubmed: 16824213
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e030711
pubmed: 32165550
J R Soc Med. 2002 Nov;95(11):531-5
pubmed: 12411615
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;29(6):359-366
pubmed: 28961631
J Reprod Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(3-4):158-62
pubmed: 21542535
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;198(6):710.e1-8; discussion 710.e8-9
pubmed: 18538161
BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1016-20
pubmed: 8616351
Trials. 2014 Apr 23;15:139
pubmed: 24755011
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Apr;51(2):199-213
pubmed: 27658913
BMJ. 2010 Oct 05;341:c4834
pubmed: 20923840
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;184(6):1149-55
pubmed: 11349181
Stat Med. 2005 Apr 15;24(7):993-1007
pubmed: 15570623

Auteurs

Gordon Forbes (G)

IoPPN, King's College London, London, UK.

Sian Newton (S)

Centre for Primary Care and Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Clara Cantalapiedra Calvete (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Judy Birch (J)

Pelvic Pain Support Network, Poole, UK.

Julie Dodds (J)

Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

Liz Steed (L)

Centre for Primary Care and Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Carol Rivas (C)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Khalid Khan (K)

Department of Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Frank Röhricht (F)

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Centre for Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Stephanie Taylor (S)

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Brennan C Kahan (BC)

Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Elizabeth Ball (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK elizabeth.ball9@nhs.net.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH